Chinese Economics Thread

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
The arms market isn't as important for the Russians as the oil and gas markets are. Whatever the Russians lost to the Chinese here, it would be tiny compared to all the oil, gas, mineral, and agricultural products such as soybean China is buying from Russia. The sky high rising prices of LNG is a recent boom for the Russians, and you also have the historical first deliveries of LNG via the North East route.

What you say is not necessary untrue. But the fact of the matter is, I don't think Russia want to loose the arms market by its own choice. It is lucky enough that it had other substitute to sell to the world. Otherwise, they would really be in a bind.
 
What you say is not necessary untrue. But the fact of the matter is, I don't think Russia want to loose the arms market by its own choice. It is lucky enough that it had other substitute to sell to the world. Otherwise, they would really be in a bind.
I do not China and Russia has a lot of overlap in their military export. Russia has very limited capacity for naval export, UAV. MBT export to Thailand and Pakistan or even Bangladesh are not in direct competition with Russia. Exports in Aircraft are mostly to Pakistan and was ever a Russian arms buyer.
 

Mt1701d

Junior Member
Registered Member
I do not China and Russia has a lot of overlap in their military export. Russia has very limited capacity for naval export, UAV. MBT export to Thailand and Pakistan or even Bangladesh are not in direct competition with Russia. Exports in Aircraft are mostly to Pakistan and was ever a Russian arms buyer.
I am not sure that’s the case... I think the only item that doesn’t have overlap is UAV, where China can out produce with reasonable prices and is arguably more advanced in.

For naval side, much of the capacity will be taken up by PLAN for the foreseeable future and the primary market is the odd frigates, corvettes or costal patrol boats, much of the costal nation will want to move towards some form of shipbuilding for themselves should they be able to do so, additionally the nations that cannot/not financially viable to build but can afford it are mostly western nations which would not consider Chinese warships, thus the market therefore is relatively small, both in terms of potential customers and their potential budgets... perhaps naval weaponry and systems might remain big market, since even if the costal nations can build warships they might not have the array of offerings in terms weapons, missiles and systems. Not every country is India...

For ground forces, there would have big overlaps... the Russian’s offerings is quite well received from small arms to armour and China while having a big presence in small arms, have a relatively smaller one in armour but is gaining ground with new offerings in tanks and SPGs. I am sure this will be a fierce battle ground in the future, as China’s offering continue to improve in quality with competitive pricing. Also let’s not forget the other upcoming nations, like Turkey and Indonesia to a lesser extent, starting to have some new and competitive offerings, since ground force arms has by far the lowest barrier to entry. Again not every country is India.

I think the airforce is where it is at... this will be the single biggest battle ground... China was and to some extent still is hampered by the engine department... for the foreseeable future China will be building engines for its own use as the airforce continue to grow and improve... but once this nut is cracked and production go into full swing, the battle for market between China and Russia will be huge... the number of nation that can build their own jets or jet engines are limited and will continue to be limited for some time... most nations looking to build their airforce will have very limited offerings... and if they are not friends with the west or a ‘neutral‘ nation with a stupidly large budget then their options are basically China (I will put the JF 17 into the China camp here) or Russia and this market is slowly but surely increasing. In addition with China being able to build flankers, capable of using some legacy Russian weaponry, Russia’s advantage with nations already using Russian jets and is looking to update will surely shrink as time goes by, thereby becoming the biggest arms export battle ground between the two nations. I don’t think I need to repeat what has been said a third time.
 
Last edited:

Orthan

Senior Member
the nations that cannot/not financially viable to build but can afford it are mostly western nations which would not consider Chinese warships,
That can also be said of the air forces.

This is no longer the cold war. Military budgets arent as huge as they were during that era.
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
That can also be said of the air forces.

This is no longer the cold war. Military budgets arent as huge as they were during that era.

Who's military budget? Tell that to the western nations that cold war is over. And NATO very existence is no longer valid.
 

Mt1701d

Junior Member
Registered Member
That can also be said of the air forces.
Sure thats true but the per unit cost can be vastly different say a light fighter vs the latest fighter with all the bells and whistles... also the potential utility of a small airforce is more flexible... and for land locked nations that don’t need to support any navy, a small airforce would be a force multiplier for defence. Tho having said that drones seems to be taking that position in the future, but it would still be classified as airforce for argument sake.
This is no longer the cold war. Military budgets arent as huge as they were during that era.
Not necessarily true... discounting the western nations... as developing nations become more prosperous and general wealth increase so will their military budgets, whilst it’s not the Cold War anymore conflicts will never cease and the more prosperous nation will spend to keep their nations safe from external and maybe even internal threats.
 

j17wang

Senior Member
Registered Member
What you say is not necessary untrue. But the fact of the matter is, I don't think Russia want to loose the arms market by its own choice. It is lucky enough that it had other substitute to sell to the world. Otherwise, they would really be in a bind.
The arms industry is also generally worth more on a dollar per dollar basis, since its underpinned by more science and technology. I believe it makes sense for China to continue purchasing small batch weapons from Russia, just so it also sees how other military powers approach the same idea. Also, may help keep competition with China's own weapons industries.
 

Orthan

Senior Member
Who's military budget? Tell that to the western nations that cold war is over. And NATO very existence is no longer valid.
The western nations know that the cold war is over. IMO, NATO´s reason for existence is a moot point in the sense that, nowadays, NATO is largely just the US.
as developing nations become more prosperous and general wealth increase so will their military budgets, whilst it’s not the Cold War anymore conflicts will never cease and the more prosperous nation will spend to keep their nations safe from external and maybe even internal threats.
Developing nations cant replace the reduction of military budgets from developed nations. Of course the latter will continue to spend on the military, just not as much as they used to.
 

Mt1701d

Junior Member
Registered Member
Developing nations cant replace the reduction of military budgets from developed nations. Of course the latter will continue to spend on the military, just not as much as they used to.
Yea... but that’s irrelevant... the developed nations will either be producing or procuring from ‘allied’ nations, we are talking specifically about the exports from China and/or Russia, which is mainly concerned with developing nations with smaller budgets, which may not be able to afford the higher priced equipment from western nations... whether their combined budget can replace the drop in budget from developed nations is irrelevant. Anyway we can move to another thread to continue if you want.

@siegecrossbow sorry I will typing the reply as your post went up... I will stop replying to this topic here...
 
Top