Chinese Economics Thread

weig2000

Captain
Are you calling me a troll? Point it to where i have done so.

Not sure, but let's see some patterns of trolling:

1. Respond mostly in one or two sentences, often in provocative way.
2. Consistently bias to one direction, but almost never provide any substance to back up
3. Clearly show lack of basic reading comprehension skill when engaging in discussions; dodge/ignore/misrepresent the essential points the other party makes.
4. ...

I consider anyone who consistently demonstrate such patterns over a period time to be troll. Do you fit into such pattern? You tell me, or everyone can judge.
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
Not sure, but let's see some patterns of trolling:

1. Respond mostly in one or two sentences, often in provocative way.
2. Consistently bias to one direction, but almost never provide any substance to back up
3. Clearly show lack of basic reading comprehension skill when engaging in discussions; dodge/ignore/misrepresent the essential points the other party makes.
4. ...

I consider anyone who consistently demonstrate such patterns over a period time to be troll. Do you fit into such pattern? You tell me, or everyone can judge.

I think we should leave him be. He's post shows how ignorant and out of touch with reality he is. It's quite entertaining in a warp sort of way. Lol
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
China continuing to outpace the U.S. economy, CFO survey reveals
  • China’s economic growth out of the pandemic is leading the world, according to the Q4 CNBC Global CFO Council Survey, which includes chief financial officers of large multinational corporations.
  • CFOs based in Asia are also the most confident about making 2021 strategic plans based on a vaccine ending the Covid-19 pandemic rather than planning around another surge in Covid cases.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
Not sure, but let's see some patterns of trolling:

1. Respond mostly in one or two sentences, often in provocative way.
2. Consistently bias to one direction, but almost never provide any substance to back up
3. Clearly show lack of basic reading comprehension skill when engaging in discussions; dodge/ignore/misrepresent the essential points the other party makes.
4. ...

I consider anyone who consistently demonstrate such patterns over a period time to be troll. Do you fit into such pattern? You tell me, or everyone can judge.

Isn't Orthan the guy who claims to be from Portugal, and some member tried talking to him a few times in Portuguese and he went radio silence?
 
Last edited:

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
I love how China has turned to this "wolf warrior diplomacy" to counter the critics' cry-baby diplomacy. I've been watching Marsha Blackburn's twitter account and I so far have only seen one comment about China today and it was repeat from yesterday. I bet she was shocked being called the big B. A racist being shocked only tells you how she expected a lopsided war of words in her favor. She was expecting a geisha-type reaction from China. Her racist views were okay but sexist comments are crossing the line. Same with Australia and remember even before Sweden upset that their officials' insults to China were now getting responses back and they called that a violation of their free speech because it might hold back insults from their officials. They hide behind human rights so somehow that means they can never be charged with human rights violations when they do commit them. Their free speech is violated when someone says something aggressive in return to their insults. This reminds again of the former Key Aviation forum where people would come up these us vs them scenarios with China and for their side, they could have any weapon even future speculated ones on their side but China was restricted to 70s and 80s Chinese weapons.
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
I love how China has turned to this "wolf warrior diplomacy" to counter the critics' cry-baby diplomacy. I've been watching Marsha Blackburn's twitter account and I so far have only seen one comment about China today and it was repeat from yesterday. I bet she was shocked being called the big B. A racist being shocked only tells you how she expected a lopsided war of words in her favor. She was expecting a geisha-type reaction from China. Her racist views were okay but sexist comments are crossing the line. Same with Australia and remember even before Sweden upset that their officials' insults to China were now getting responses back and they called that a violation of their free speech because it might hold back insults from their officials. They hide behind human rights so somehow that means they can never be charged with human rights violations when they do commit them. Their free speech is violated when someone says something aggressive in return to their insults. This reminds again of the former Key Aviation forum where people would come up these us vs them scenarios with China and for their side, they could have any weapon even future speculated ones on their side but China was restricted to 70s and 80s Chinese weapons.
Well there is a time to stay restrained, and a time to fight fire with fire (punch back). The geopolitical situation for China right now is not in China's favor, considering the US platform dominance of social media. So you have to fight back strategically. In the case of Australia and Marsha Blackburn, they're standing on quicksand, and this is where China can win a fight.

As ansy1968 mentioned, now is no longer a time to bide your time and hide your capabilities, China's now ever-involved in world affairs. Previously China could just avoid fighting back, since no one showed massive interest in containing it. Now, multiple forces are arrayed against China, and if China just does nothing like in the past, it could cause massive damage to China's continued growth. So China has to pick its fights carefully, and make sure to win the ones that can be won. China still isn't in a dominant position when it can win every fight.
 
Top