Japan is at the top of the food chain when it comes to robotics and industrial automation. But japan recognizes that automation is designed to create higher end jobs, not replace humans.
So even with automation, China still needs to find ways to find employment for its citizens.
In fact, automation makes it even harder because creating high end jobs is a lot tougher for the government than low wage manufacturing jobs.
As I was saying in another thread, which country is poorer, Japan? Or India and Nigeria? Demographic dividend my foot. In the next two decades, India is going to find it increasingly difficult to find jobs for all those unskilled labours coming onto the labour market. And this will add drag to the economy.
As my tutor tells me when I was an economic students. All the demographic dividend does at best, is to increase GDP at the national level. Which should push India into the "big boy league" with China and USA. It brings prestige and maybe military poweress. But it adds nothing to the ordinary folks daily living standards.
The only way to increase the average persons utilities is to increase their income via GDP per capita. And here my tutor says the SOLOW economic model is where is at. The SOLOW model suggest GDP per capita, and individual utilities can only be increase via technological advances.
So this demographic dividends is really a nonsense. I mean, what's the common features of all these low income countries? Large illiterate population.