China need a new geopolitical Doctrine ?


AndrewS

Captain
Registered Member
@gadgetcool5

You previously wanted China to stand for something, but couldn't come up with a narrative that would actually work.

Well, I'm giving you a possible one below, which is China liberating the Kashmiri people from the occupying India Army
And which would highlight the nature of the Indian democratic government run by the BJP/RSS.

BJP/RSS ideology is as a Hindu-Aryan supremacist organisation which even today conducts anti-Muslim pogroms and lynchings like the Nazis did against the Jews. Time article below.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Remember that even Hitler started as the democratically elected leader of the German Republic.
Below is a New York Times article on Prime Minister Modi and Home Minister Shah when they were in charge of the Gujarat riots decades ago.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I think China has decided to make it clear that India joining an anti-China alliance like the QUAD is not an option.
China has past form on this point with the 1951 Korean War and 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War.

And that one of the punishments could be occupied Kashmir/Ladakh being liberated from the oppressive police state operated by the Indian Army. There are also 7million angry Muslims in the Kashmir Valley, and suppose China and Pakistan work together to prevent the Indian Army from reaching Kashmir.

References below.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

drebin052

Just Hatched
Registered Member
You do realise that the USA has already lost Europe, which has decided to be neutral between a China-US contest?
Read the reports below, and then think what is happening in Japan and elsewhere in Asia.
I'd be weary of assuming that the relationship is "over" just because of one administration. Merkel & co. are simply sitting on the fence waiting to see what comes out of the November elections.
 

AndrewS

Captain
Registered Member
I'd be weary of assuming that the relationship is "over" just because of one administration. Merkel & co. are simply sitting on the fence waiting to see what comes out of the November elections.
What you've just written was accurate 3 years ago, but not anymore.

The biggest changes have been:

1. The worsening strategic competition / cold war between China and the USA, with EU interests stuck in the middle.
2. The departure of the Atlanticist UK from the European Union, removing a key blockage to further EU integration.
3. The Coronavirus making Europeans really realise they need a stronger European Union government to control their own destiny.
4. And it's been the trigger for Germany to agree and lead on the first European Union common treasury bonds, backed up by a larger federal budget as well.
 

gadgetcool5

New Member
Registered Member
@gadgetcool5

You previously wanted China to stand for something, but couldn't come up with a narrative that would actually work.

Well, I'm giving you a possible one below, which is China liberating the Kashmiri people from the occupying India Army
And which would highlight the nature of the Indian democratic government run by the BJP/RSS.

BJP/RSS ideology is as a Hindu-Aryan supremacist organisation which even today conducts anti-Muslim pogroms and lynchings like the Nazis did against the Jews. Time article below.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Remember that even Hitler started as the democratically elected leader of the German Republic.
Below is a New York Times article on Prime Minister Modi and Home Minister Shah when they were in charge of the Gujarat riots decades ago.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
So your proposal is that China should stand for the universal principle of anti-racism?

I agree that would work. It would give China ground to criticize the BJP. But to do that, China would have to relent the yoke of the Uighurs a bit, to be consistent.
 

AndrewS

Captain
Registered Member
So your proposal is that China should stand for the universal principle of anti-racism?

I agree that would work. It would give China ground to criticize the BJP. But to do that, China would have to relent the yoke of the Uighurs a bit, to be consistent.
No, I said it was something for you to consider, since you said you wanted China to stand for something, anything at all.

And the principle is not anti-racism. It's that armies shouldn't be used as an oppressive occupation force.
 

supercat

Junior Member
I'd be weary of assuming that the relationship is "over" just because of one administration. Merkel & co. are simply sitting on the fence waiting to see what comes out of the November elections.
At this point, an united EU-U.S. front against China seems like someone's pipe dream.
Trump ouster will not heal US ties, says Germany's Maas
Germany's foreign minister said relations with Washington won't be boosted by Donald Trump leaving office. The US president has sunk transatlantic ties, most recently over defense spending and the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

On the other hand, "decoupling" from China is much easier said than done.

Companies prodded to rely less on China, but few respond (except for the pharmaceutical industry)
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

escobar

Brigadier
There is no if. You don't even understand what it means to station ballistic missiles on Taiwan. Just look at Cuban missile crisis. Either China declared war or kiss Taiwan goodbye.
And i'm saying you should not take for granted that China will declare war...
 

escobar

Brigadier
2. In comparison, China will probably double military spending in the 10 years. And this is a low-medium case estimate.
Really? you like to speculate too much

And how does a small number of conventional ballistic missiles based on Taiwan (with a one time shot) change the military balance?
So you accept that CHina could not declare war after those missiles being deployed in tawain

You do realise that the USA has already lost Europe, which has decided to be neutral between a China-US contest?
US militay still present in Europe and not going to change. So the "US lost Europe" doesn't mean much
 

escobar

Brigadier
And even if China doesn't react violently in that case, it still wouldn't do anything for your point; it would just prove that China needs to further build-up its military.
He say, US ballistic missiles on Taiwan mean war and I'am saying : it's not a certainty.
How that does no prove my point?
 

escobar

Brigadier
Obvious to anyone who is able to think and analyze. I think it escapes you that many of the people who seem "convinced" are actually people who always hated China and did not care if any reason provided is real or not. They are not convinced; they are just jumping on any opportunity to express their hated. There is no PR that will convince these people of anything that their government does not feed them.
That is your big issue. You want other to love China. And when it is not happening you have emotional reaction.

I simply said they are not trustworthy; I did not make several posts to analyze and debunk them because they're not worth it. (I honestly didn't even read gadgetcool's article except the title but knew how to rebut it anyway.) The latter would be jumping. English problems are everywhere with you.
They are saying China is doing genocide...

If somebody hits you and you hit back, that is dumb and emotional? OK, by your unique definition. You may adhere to that conduct for yourself; China will do what is natural and deemed appropriate by the CCP.
US hit China with trade tarrif and China almost beg for the trade deal. Where was the serious hit back?

China is good at IR,
Illusion. China is still living in a bubble in IR

It's cancelled. You want Japan to come out and say they will ditch the US and go with a Chinese alliance? LOL Asking for much, no road-map to get there. That has nothing to with the IR/PR; that is about power.
So funny, Japan cancelled a radar and you really think Japan will ditch the US alliance for China.

That's not substance; if China sent a team to do some training drills in Venezuela/Cuba, you call that substance?
US is not calling Venezuela/Cuba a rebel province.

I showed you want substance is; gaining territory and building/expanding on them. How is a couple of guys getting together doing jumping jacks substance?
it begin with a couple of guys...
 

Top