But why though?
Ask anything Thread
- Thread starter Jeff Head
- Start date
But why though?
Well gurkhas are super soldiers so why not have some in the PLA.
The point is, at least officially, the PLA does not entertain the idea of "martial race", nor does it have a legacy of colonialism. Also, as far as I know, there is no provision for foreign nationals to join the PLA officially.
Tl;dr: not gonna happen
At present, China will not recruit foreign mercenaries. The French Foreign Legion or the British Gurkha are rare examples.
However, there are Gurkhas in China. They are called "Daman(达曼人）".
They are the remnant soldiers left after the failure of Gurkha's invasion of Tibet. For a long time, they had no citizenship because of their special status. Because of their long-term settlement in Tibet, their culture has been somewhat different from that of Nepalese people.
In the 21st century, the government officially granted them citizenship and helped them to carry out economic construction. According to the comments below the video, some people in this small group of hundreds have joined the army. As a group at the border, they will also assume the responsibility of monitoring the border.
Its an unfortunate byproduct of any organization. Even companies have their own version of hazing. Such behavior demonstrates leadership issues within the unit and they should be kicked out or, at the very least, demoted to a private.
This is old news.
I have a question that just came to mind.
I recently discovered the Robinson Armament XCR, and I'm very interested in its bolt and bolt carrier design, specifically the cam lug and the cam track (shown below).
If QBZ-191 adopts the cam lug (I guess it's now a cam pin?) and the cam track design, as well as adapting its own 4-lug bolt, would that be a better design?
The anti-preengagement system is less secure by design because there's no positive lock, just engagement between the cam lug and the cam track. However, AKs, FN FNC, SIG 550, and now Robinson XCR all use variants of this design without any problem, so I think it's not a problem at all.
I recently discovered the Robinson Armament XCR, and I'm very interested in its bolt and bolt carrier design, specifically the cam lug and the cam track (shown below).
If QBZ-191 adopts the cam lug (I guess it's now a cam pin?) and the cam track design, as well as adapting its own 4-lug bolt, would that be a better design?
The anti-preengagement system is less secure by design because there's no positive lock, just engagement between the cam lug and the cam track. However, AKs, FN FNC, SIG 550, and now Robinson XCR all use variants of this design without any problem, so I think it's not a problem at all.
Try ask in the small arms thread, or check out cabbage's video on the QBZ-191I have a question that just came to mind.
I recently discovered the Robinson Armament XCR, and I'm very interested in its bolt and bolt carrier design, specifically the cam lug and the cam track (shown below).
If QBZ-191 adopts the cam lug (I guess it's now a cam pin?) and the cam track design, as well as adapting its own 4-lug bolt, would that be a better design?
The anti-preengagement system is less secure by design because there's no positive lock, just engagement between the cam lug and the cam track. However, AKs, FN FNC, SIG 550, and now Robinson XCR all use variants of this design without any problem, so I think it's not a problem at all.
刚刚在 81.cn 上阅读了一篇关于边防人员 (边防员) 的文章并在那里, qutoes
另一方面，我对边境控制之类的东西几乎一无所知，像我们所说的边防卫队这样的民兵是如何通过监视设备获取有关潜在情况的信息的？或者只是四处巡逻？我们有任何以前的例子可以学习吗？比如在中东？我听说真主党和以色列之间的边界战争在过去几十年里非常激烈。或者我们知道是否有与中国边境系统类似的系统？
PS：我对边防人员做了一些调查，原来他们属于当地警察边防部门并受雇
但他们既不是警察也不是辅警，他们的头衔只是简称为“边防军”
I was using google translator to check spellings and staff, and it turns the writing into Chinese, sorry guys I'll rewrite one later I don't think I can't rewrite the whole thing under 5 mins so please someone delete it
所以显然中国边境管制系统有两个部分，一个是属于解放军的边防人员，另一个是不属于解放军的边防人员，这也在它引用的文章中
在这些部分，我们可以得出结论，边防部队（不是解放军）将比解放军的边防部队到达更远的地方，作为他们观察边界线并报告任何怀疑的眼睛，解放军将在其中发挥作用快速反应部队对任何报告作出回应，但我们是否知道解放军是否会定期自行在那里进行任何基本巡逻？我们当然知道答案是肯定的，但在多大程度上呢？我希望 pla 或 pap 将接管边防卫队（没有 pla）在恶劣环境下的角色，但是边防卫队所在的地区呢？我们有证据表明解放军将以月为单位对它们进行检查，但同样，以什么为单位？一名边防警卫负责多少区域？如果它很小，
另一方面，我对边境控制之类的东西几乎一无所知，像我们所说的边防卫队这样的民兵是如何通过监视设备获取有关潜在情况的信息的？或者只是四处巡逻？我们有任何以前的例子可以学习吗？比如在中东？我听说真主党和以色列之间的边界战争在过去几十年里非常激烈。或者我们知道是否有与中国边境系统类似的系统？
PS：我对边防人员做了一些调查，原来他们属于当地警察边防部门并受雇
但他们既不是警察也不是辅警，他们的头衔只是简称为“边防军”
I was using google translator to check spellings and staff, and it turns the writing into Chinese, sorry guys I'll rewrite one later I don't think I can't rewrite the whole thing under 5 mins so please someone delete it