Ask anything Thread
- Thread starter Jeff Head
- Start date
Inner Mongolia gdp per capital is 10 times higher than Outer Mongolia, so why they want to independent? Brain damaged?
Plus, Outer Mongolia are mostly khalkha mongals, whereas inner mongals are heir of golden family…
Outer Mongolia using Cyrillic script and Inner Mongolia using traditional script
so even from a culturally aspect, it should be other way around…
In reality, most Mongolian I know in China wish the government could takeover Outer Mongolia in the future and united under china instead of independence …
I mean Mongols in Xinjiang.
Ethnic Mongols have very insignificant presence in Xinjiang.
What I said was general mongols in China, plus, why you think mongols in xinjiang would be different to those in other places?
Well Mongollians claim that Xinjiang Mongols want to join with their Uyghur, "Brothers" despite Uyghurs wanting an islamic calpiphate.
But an important one nevertheless because it proves that northern xinjiang is not Uyghur.
lol, northern xinjiang is not mongols as well… there are many different minorities in xinjiang has more population than mongols and most importantly there are more Han Chinese in Xinjiang than any other minorities including Uyghur…
overall this is absolutely none sense, just like those Texas or Florida independence nonsense or Mexico to take over Texas things, we should be laughing at it instead of brought around and spread the rumor like it’s real
no… northern Xinjiang is of course not Uyghurs, but it has nothing to do with mongols as well…
Sorry to interrupt the "mongols in Xinjiang" thing. I just had a question popped up in my head and I don't know where else to put it.
So, I figure that about the only good thing that came out of the twenty-or-so years waste of human lives and energy known as "the Global War on Terror" was improvement in trauma care, especially in the field.
One example of which is tourniquet usage. In the olden days, it was discouraged as "last resort" for fear of loss of limb from necrosis (and if you have taken a CPR/first aid course as recent as late 2000s in Canada, you would have heard it). However, nowadays it is actively encouraged to use it if one if available, and as a first resort.
Aggresive usage of tourniquet leads to another topic, which is proliferation of first aid/buddy aid kit. While issuing field dressing to everyone is not a new concept, having a entire kit of various stuff on top of dressing issued to everyone is pretty new. US Army Improved First Aid Kit circa early 2010s has, at least to my knowledge: CAT tourniquet, "Israeli" pressure dressing, QuikClot gauze (hemostatic agent/wound dressing), and nasopharyngeal airway aka nasal trumpet for airway management. Obviously, this is much more elaborate than WWII-era of "sulfa" powder/tablet and wound dressing.
Now, to move the focus back to PLA, while there are a lot of pictures of PLAGF troops in hi-speed-lo-drag gears, I haven't seen anything resembling first aid kit on them. Then again, I might just be blind and missed it. And in Galwan videos, you can obviously see wounded POWs with various form of dressings on them, so that means someone in the field is obviously carrying them, and in sufficient quantities. So now my question is: what is PLAGF's doctrine on personal first aid kit (if there is any)? And if it exists, what is the content? And by extension, what is PLAGF's doctrine on casualty treatment and extraction?
P.S. I don't really need PatchworkChimera(RIP)-level of write-up. Just the basics is fine. Also, if this is classified for some reason, please let me know. I don't want anyone get into trouble over this.
So, I figure that about the only good thing that came out of the twenty-or-so years waste of human lives and energy known as "the Global War on Terror" was improvement in trauma care, especially in the field.
One example of which is tourniquet usage. In the olden days, it was discouraged as "last resort" for fear of loss of limb from necrosis (and if you have taken a CPR/first aid course as recent as late 2000s in Canada, you would have heard it). However, nowadays it is actively encouraged to use it if one if available, and as a first resort.
Aggresive usage of tourniquet leads to another topic, which is proliferation of first aid/buddy aid kit. While issuing field dressing to everyone is not a new concept, having a entire kit of various stuff on top of dressing issued to everyone is pretty new. US Army Improved First Aid Kit circa early 2010s has, at least to my knowledge: CAT tourniquet, "Israeli" pressure dressing, QuikClot gauze (hemostatic agent/wound dressing), and nasopharyngeal airway aka nasal trumpet for airway management. Obviously, this is much more elaborate than WWII-era of "sulfa" powder/tablet and wound dressing.
Now, to move the focus back to PLA, while there are a lot of pictures of PLAGF troops in hi-speed-lo-drag gears, I haven't seen anything resembling first aid kit on them. Then again, I might just be blind and missed it. And in Galwan videos, you can obviously see wounded POWs with various form of dressings on them, so that means someone in the field is obviously carrying them, and in sufficient quantities. So now my question is: what is PLAGF's doctrine on personal first aid kit (if there is any)? And if it exists, what is the content? And by extension, what is PLAGF's doctrine on casualty treatment and extraction?
P.S. I don't really need PatchworkChimera(RIP)-level of write-up. Just the basics is fine. Also, if this is classified for some reason, please let me know. I don't want anyone get into trouble over this.