All is not what it seems within China's High Speed Rail development.

Spartan95

Junior Member
Looks like some teething issues with PRC's brand new Beijing-Shanghai high speed railway:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China's new high-speed trains halted again
Posted: 12 July 2011 2112 hrs

BEIJING - China's new flagship high-speed rail link between Beijing and Shanghai suffered fresh delays Tuesday due to a power cut, transport authorities said, two days after a similar incident hit the line.

A power failure near the eastern city of Suzhou in Anhui province halted trains on the $33 billion line, before services re-started two hours later once faulty equipment had been repaired, the railways ministry said in a statement.

"The air-conditioning went out and it was sweltering in the carriage," a passenger was quoted as saying by the news website Eastday.com.

The incident was the second in just three days after 19 trains were halted for about 90 minutes Sunday when thunderstorms and heavy winds brought down the power supply to a section of the line in the eastern province of Shandong.

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao formally opened the new line, which halves the rail journey time between the two Chinese cities, on June 30, although it had been operating on a trial basis since mid-May.

He said the high-speed line -- launched on the eve of celebrations to mark the 90th birthday of China's Communist Party -- would be key to "improving the modern transport system... and satisfying people's travelling needs".

However, huge investment in the new link has made the sector a hotbed for corruption, raising concerns over costs and safety.

China's state auditor in March said construction companies and individuals last year siphoned off 187 million yuan (US$29 million) in funds meant for the Beijing-Shanghai link.

The revelation followed the February sacking of former railways minister Liu Zhijun, who allegedly took more than 800 million yuan in kickbacks over several years on contracts linked to China's high-speed network.

- AFP/ir

Given the complexity of the project, this is to be expected though.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Looks like some teething issues with PRC's brand new Beijing-Shanghai high speed railway:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Given the complexity of the project, this is to be expected though.

I was surprised that there is not more of problems. Giving such an immense project, within blinding speed schedule, problem will surely crop up nothing unusual. Overall China chalk up another success

All those fuss about half empty seat is nothing but rant of western journalist.Eyewitness account the line was fully book except early in the morning
 

zoom

Junior Member
I was surprised that there is not more of problems. Giving such an immense project, within blinding speed schedule, problem will surely crop up nothing unusual. Overall China chalk up another success
HEAR HEAR ! When i use public transport in my hometown they are half-empty outside peak times and they've been running for many decades.We should all marvel at this achievement by China.

BTW, here is a better look at my new avatar>
thunderbirds.jpg
 

bladerunner

Banned Idiot
I was surprised that there is not more of problems. Giving such an immense project, within blinding speed schedule, problem will surely crop up nothing unusual. Overall China chalk up another success

Deserved or otherwise I think there will be a question mark hanging over products made in China for sometime to come.

Ok on what basis can you substantiate that China makes the bestest trains.
Even when New Zealand used international consultants to recommend Four of the most capable train builders to tender for the half billion locomotive project in Auckland China was not even considered

And not only that it was only a couple of years ago with the Bay Bridge project in SAn Fran. inspectors from America found substandard welding in key parts made by Zenhua a subsidiary of CCCC a prestigous and builder of many bridges around China.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Although the faults were fixed it was claimed that the inspectors were too strict and were later fired.

My point is that they copped so much bad press over the years over quality its proving hard to shake off. As regards the quality of welding that had been found been wanting by Western standards . had this been a internal job would there have been the same concern given the rush to get things done in a great hurry or cost saving and how do we know that this does'nt occur within the railway construction.

Also problems may not crop up straight aways. They can present themselves years from now in the form of premature wearing out etc.
 
Last edited:

solarz

Brigadier
Deserved or otherwise I think there will be a question mark hanging over products made in China for sometime to come.

Ok on what basis can you substantiate that China makes the bestest trains.
Even when New Zealand used international consultants to recommend Four of the most capable train builders to tender for the half billion locomotive project in Auckland China was not even considered

Politics maybe? I've taken the French TGV. It not even as good as China's Dongche, nevermind the new HSR.

And not only that it was only a couple of years ago with the Bay Bridge project in SAn Fran. inspectors from America found substandard welding in key parts made by Zenhua a subsidiary of CCCC a prestigous and builder of many bridges around China.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Although the faults were fixed it was claimed that the inspectors were too strict and were later fired.

If the inspectors were American, then it certainly wasn't China that fired them.

My point is that they copped so much bad press over the years over quality its proving hard to shake off. As regards the quality of welding that had been found been wanting by Western standards . had this been a internal job would there have been the same concern given the rush to get things done in a great hurry or cost saving and how do we know that this does'nt occur within the railway construction.

Also problems may not crop up straight aways. They can present themselves years from now in the form of premature wearing out etc.

Japan had to go through the same phase. Look at where their brands are at now.
 

T-U-P

The Punisher
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
The Beijing-Shanghai CRH is not the first and only CRH line that China has. In fact there are a good number of CRH lines in service for a few years now. Why has there been no problem on the other lines (or is it covered up due to the political environment back then?)
 

zoom

Junior Member
Maybe this hits the nail on the head>

But Zhang Quanling, an anchor with China Central Television, said on her micro blog that the railway authorities should cast a critical glance at their operations.

"Why do the public and media express doubt and act 'irrationally'? Because when some (government) departments promote a new thing or a new policy, they only talk about the positive, but avoid mentioning shortcomings," she said. "The public may not buy the words totally, but their expectations are high.

"If the railway department pre-warned that high-speed trains could be disrupted by thunderstorms and gales, or that problems are inevitable in the initial stages, I would not have such high expectations ... Rationality should be fostered from the very beginning."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

zoom

Junior Member
And some positive news >

An international standard drafted by China South Locomotive and Rolling Stock Industry Group Corp (CSR) on overhead railway contact lines was permitted by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), Beijing Daily reported on Thursday.
It is the first time China made an international standard in the railway industry. The overhead contact line is used to supply power for the train's electric traction.

This standard, which was proposed by CSR Zhuzhou Electric Co Ltd in 2009, was officially launched on June 29, 2011, with 100 percent agreement of all IEC's member countries.

The report said it is a big step for China's railway industry because the international standards in this field were in the past always made by developed countries.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Also> Setting the pace in Turkey
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Deserved or otherwise I think there will be a question mark hanging over products made in China for sometime to come.

Ok on what basis can you substantiate that China makes the bestest trains.
Even when New Zealand used international consultants to recommend Four of the most capable train builders to tender for the half billion locomotive project in Auckland China was not even considered

And not only that it was only a couple of years ago with the Bay Bridge project in SAn Fran. inspectors from America found substandard welding in key parts made by Zenhua a subsidiary of CCCC a prestigous and builder of many bridges around China.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Although the faults were fixed it was claimed that the inspectors were too strict and were later fired.

My point is that they copped so much bad press over the years over quality its proving hard to shake off. As regards the quality of welding that had been found been wanting by Western standards . had this been a internal job would there have been the same concern given the rush to get things done in a great hurry or cost saving and how do we know that this does'nt occur within the railway construction.

Also problems may not crop up straight aways. They can present themselves years from now in the form of premature wearing out etc.

My answer to those critics are these. China has built hundred of bridges ranging from 1 mile to 35 mile long none has so far collapsed due to bad workmanship.

I mean if you find bad weld during construction, it is nothing unusual that is the reason why they have inspectors in place to witness and check,certify on quality of works

They do have welding procedure and test weld that has to be first approved by the owner in this case the Caltran/designer So if the many production welds are bad maybe they have bad welding procedure ?. That is the responsibility of owner/design engineer and not fabricator

Anyway it is old news the last segment of bay bridge has been delivered. Anyway if you choose bay bridge to highlight China's poor workmanship, you probably choose the wrong place. Bay bridge project is plagued with problems 3.5 times over budget and take 3 times longer than expected
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


July 11 (Bloomberg) -- The final segments for San Francisco Bay's new suspension bridge are being loaded onto a ship in Shanghai today, moving California's largest current public works project a step closer to completion.

The four steel modules, weighing a combined 5,300 tons, will then make a 22-day journey across the Pacific Ocean, before being joined with 24 other sections already in place. Together, they will help form the world's longest single-tower, self- anchored suspension bridge, stretching 2,047 feet (624 meters).

Read more:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
This just goes to show all the accusations are questionable. The story about the welds on the new Bay Bridge construction had nothing to do with China. American workers did those welds. The Bay Area shipyards have a lot of cranes shipped from China which is controversial in itself. But the unions prevent any Chinese on those ships delivering those cranes from stepping foot on US soil. They have to stay onboard. So another flawed lie about the welds on the Bay Bridge is blaming it on bad Chinese worksmanship when no Chinese would've been allowed to weld them in the first place. A piece of the old Bay Bridge they're replacing broke a couple years back that closed traffic on the bridge while it was repaired. It was blamed on bad quality Chinese steel. The problem with that charge is the section that broke was part of the original construction. That bridge is about 75 years old. I live the SF Bay Area and there was no tearing down of the anchors because nothing of charges were true. They halted construction to investigate the charges and wasted taxpayers money. Just like the charges about China's HSR, the accusations about the welds on the Bay Bridge was all a political maneuver. They also blamed China for a portion of a highway overpass approach to the Bay Bridge where a gasoline tanker exploded and melted it. You know because US steel doesn't melt. Then there were accusations that the replacement came from China when the replacement portion was constructed in Arizona and delivered in less than a month. Impossible to have come from China. So guess what... they lie! Next thing you'll hear is the World Trade Center towers fell because of bad quality Chinese steel.
 
Last edited:
Top