2025 Israel - Iranian conflict

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I'm actually glad that China neither provided any sort of military support/aid nor form any military partnership/alliance in West Asia/Middle East. The only things China do with her military presence in the region are the anti-piracy patrols around Somalia and the peacekeeping forces in Lebanon under the auspices of the UN.

No matter how hard the calls for China to "step in, become the responsible big brother, and salvage XXX situations" - If those country's people themselves don't want to help themselves, then what's in for China to help them?

Besides, it's not like Iran is chummy with China either. The Iranian people even jeered at the Chinese people with the "Ching Chong Chang" types of racist slurs, all while licking the West despite being slapped in the face multiple times - All while China is one of the only few countries that are keeping the country afloat in amongst those crushing international sanctions. Remember that Chabahar Port deal with India in order to "counter China's Gwadar Port in Pakistan"?

Just go take a look around the military-watching discourse on Weibo - They don't exactly have a positive, flowery view of Iran, way before today's Israeli strike. "伊朗要升旗了" and "伊朗变成了筛子" are not phrases of complement.

I'd say this - Iran better gets its sh1t together, stop the "we wuz" kanging sh1t, and actually be humble in their dealings with China. Otherwise, good luck.
I just want to remind people of the public opinion map.

GlobPubOpin_carousel_silver.png


Iran is less favorable to China than Spain and Norway. I was about to say India until I realized that they were so pro US they were actually beating some countries in EU and NATO while India is mostly doing their own thing.

Russians are statistically very pro China in comparison.
 

delfer

New Member
Registered Member
yes but with reservation. Russia also infiltrated Ukraine to the same degree - or so they thought. Turned out most of their assets were double agents or were purged in the first few weeks of the war, and now it is 100% purely conventional inside Ukraine. And it also turns out that Ukraine has assets inside Russia too.

China has a more robust internal security system than Russia but is facing a bigger threat too.
But then again, Russia refused to go hard on Ukraine in the beginning, which gave Ukraine plenty of room and time to consolidate itself and get rid of any double agents. Assuming china doesn’t make the same mistake with Taiwan, things should go relatively smoothly.
 

Sinnavuuty

Captain
Registered Member
New wave:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
2 out of the 4 Israel KC-130 seen flying over Syria.

The KC-130 is a transport and refueling aircraft. Israel has longer range KC-707 (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
), but the scale of the operation requires every tanker available, even the smaller and slower KC-130.

Judging by the position of the sun, they are heading west, towards Israel.
 

Randomuser

Captain
Registered Member
I'm actually glad that China neither provided any sort of military support/aid nor form any military partnership/alliance in West Asia/Middle East. The only things China do with her military presence in the region are the anti-piracy patrols around Somalia and the peacekeeping forces in Lebanon under the auspices of the UN.

No matter how hard the calls for China to "step in, become the responsible big brother, and salvage XXX situations" - If those country's people themselves don't want to help themselves, then what's in for China to help them?

Besides, it's not like Iran is chummy with China either. The Iranian people/discourse even jeered at the Chinese people with the "Ching Chong Chang" types of racist slurs, while licking the boots of the West despite being slapped in the face multiple times - All while China is one of the only few countries that are keeping the country afloat in amongst those crushing international sanctions. Remember that Chabahar Port deal with India in order to "counter China's Gwadar Port in Pakistan"?

Just go take a look around the military-watching discourse on Weibo - They don't exactly have a positive, flowery view of Iran, even way before today's Israeli strike. "伊朗要升旗了" and "伊朗变成了筛子" are not phrases of complement.

I'd say this - Iran better gets its sh1t together, stop the "we wuz" kanging sh1t, and actually be humble in their dealings with China. Otherwise, good luck.
I used to admire the Russian approach and think China was being a pussy for not being like them. But it turns out trying to intervene directly too many times will just cause you to burn out faster like the USSR. I think this direct approach is a trap the west has laid out and one of the reasons the west is so frustrated with China is it does not operate that way and take the bait.
 

Randomuser

Captain
Registered Member
It doesn't, though. If they cared that much about trade, their pager attacks that showed how compromised production lines in Asia can be wouldn't have been carried out.

They will turn on you at the slightest inconvenience to their interests and they don't do compromises unless it is at gunpoint (1982, 2006). Also they are open supporters of ETIM and they look up to Israel as well, what do you think will happen when they face the slightest push back from China?.


Like I said, too much attachment to a one off that has already been paid back for and currently holds no value as Israel can't provide anything of value anymore in that regard.


It is a double edged sword. You would think China would have learnt that lesson after getting Color Revolution'd anyway despite doing Kissinger's biding in South East Asia in exchange for more open trade.
I understand your concerns and I wouldn't trust Israel or its people either. But Chinese leadership might think differently to us and that even with all the bad stuff that comes with Israel, they think they can still handle them and get a upper hand in a deal.
 

doggydogdo

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Iran’s FM submits letter to UNSC​


Abbas Araghchi has submitted a statement to the UN Security Council ahead of a meeting that is reported to be taking place later today on the subject of Israel’s attacks.
Here are the key points Araghchi made:
  • These heinous acts not only constitute a grave violation of Iran’s sovereignty and territorial integrity as a sovereign Member State of the United Nations, but also constitute acts of aggression and war crimes under international law and international humanitarian law, including the Geneva Conventions.
  • Israel, the world’s most terrorist regime, has crossed all red lines, and the international community must not allow these crimes to go unpunished.
  • The Security Council and the secretary-general must condemn this aggression and take immediate and unequivocal action.
  • Failure to respond will only embolden the aggressor, reward impunity, and fuel further chaos in an already fragile region.
  • The Islamic Republic of Iran reaffirms its inherent right to self-defence, enshrined in Article 51 of the UN Charter, and will respond firmly and proportionately to these unlawful and cowardly acts.
  • The Islamic Republic of Iran will act with determination to protect its sovereignty, its people, and its national security. This right is non-negotiable.
  • Israel will deeply regret this reckless aggression and grave strategic miscalculation.
 

gadgetcool5

Senior Member
Registered Member
I used to admire the Russian approach and think China was being a pussy for not being like them. But it turns out trying to intervene directly too many times will just cause you to burn out faster like the USSR. I think this direct approach is a trap the west has laid out and one of the reasons the west is so frustrated with China is it does not operate that way and take the bait.
I have the complete opposite view. The Russians have been dealing with the US adversarial mentality for decades and they know what it's about. In the long run, it doesn't matter if China intervenes directly or not. The US is coming for China. They are tearing up Huawei cell towers in Panama because they know they need to use that canal to transit their Atlantic fleet to the Pacific when the time comes for them to go to war with China. They are stockpiling the samarium and other rare earths China just agreed to give them, for their weapons which will be used to kill Chinese people. And at that time and place of their choosing, they will simply prod their vassal Taiwan to make an unbearable provocation and force China into a use it or lose it situation. The only difference if China saved Iran from Israel is that when the time comes, China would have one more ally in its corner. If they don't, they will have one fewer. That's the only difference.
 

delfer

New Member
Registered Member
So let me get this straight:

Saudi Arabia? Shoots down Iranian drones and missiles. Jordan? Shoots down Iranian drones and missiles. Egypt? Shoots down Iranian drones and missiles. Syria? Literally kissed Israel’s butt while they attacked them. Israeli drones and missiles? Untouched.

What the hell is going on the Middle East? Is everybody there just Israel’s lackey?
 
Top