Miscellaneous News

krautmeister

Junior Member
Registered Member
So what happens when it come to the time of settlement. I asked.

He said, well if the price goes down , the
buyer won't honoured the contract and paid us the difference to the spot market price. He will then go and get his oil on the spot market. But if the rice goes up. We then pay him the difference between the spot market price and the contract price. So he has now got enough money to purchase the oil on the spot market.

So as you can see, no oil was ever exchanged between us. So, it's basically one big giant legal gambling den!
Remember the shit show in 2020 when the oil spot price dropped under $20? HAHAHa At that time, the Coronavirus was KILLING world oil demand but production was still running almost normally. The excess oil was piling up as storage in oil tankers parked at various ports around the world. The April and May oil futures were plummeting because they were running out of oil storage capacity so the excess oil production had no place to go and traders were frantically selling oil contracts for like peanuts before the futures contracts expired. In other words, the futures holders who needed to take delivery of the oil had no choice but to sell those oil contracts for peanuts because most don't intend on taking delivery of oil since they are actually financial gamblers. Exactly like options traders in stocks. The entire thing about financial innovation, financial this or that, it all basically comes down to legalized gambling.
 

Nobaron

Junior Member
Registered Member
The external environment was different in each of those situations. With Japan, America had a monopoly of nukes and was already dominant in the conventional space and ready to invade the Japanese mainland. In the Soviet example, the US did not yet have enough nukes to totally cripple the USSR given its continental scale and ability to retaliate. In the case of China, the US could have nuked them with impunity given their protection by the Soviets was then no longer assured because of the Sino-Soviet split. Concerning North Korea, they have the protection of big brother China who intervened during the Korean War when they had no nukes and now that they do, of course they would intervene.
I see every scenarios come to one single conclusion which I stated . America was ready to nuke China when nuke protection wasn't assured from soviets. They nuked Japan because they had monopoly. They aren't nuking North Korea because of China. But somehow they are prepared to nuke China now ? :-D
Americans never move their azz until they have monopoly in the theatre.

I disagree with your stance. The Muslims were living in peace in most parts of the world for centuries without issue. It was only certain Muslim groups in specific parts of the world where they were radical and expansive in history as you had with Christianity at certain times in history. The difference is, the current Islamic radicalism you see today is entirely driven by the conditions created by the Anglo-American Mi6-CIA complex and their offshoots. I..S*s, a..L*..k*da, and every other radical Islamic group we know of today was and still is supported in some way either directly or indirectly by these mental cases. They would self describe themselves as Machiavellian strategists but what they really are is evil masterminds with no regard for Humanity and life.

Having said that, I agree that people need to protect themselves. What is done is done and when you have brainwashed people believing what they believe, they will do what they will do.
Well let's agree to disagree again. Given this is entirely different topic I won't go into that.
 

Nutrient

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
womp womp

According to the article, "Right now, export growth in China is between 20% to 40% a month". And that's astounding. If it's true, and if the growth is sustained at 20% per month over twelve months, China's exports would be almost 9 times larger at the end of the last month than it was at the beginning of the first month!
 

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
According to the article, "Right now, export growth in China is between 20% to 40% a month". And that's astounding. If it's true, and if the growth is sustained at 20% per month over twelve months, China's exports would be almost 9 times larger at the end of the last month than it was at the beginning of the first month!
The data might be wrong
Or
This export growth is just not sustainable.

don't be surprised if next or in 2 years you see a decline in exports.
 

Tyler

Captain
Registered Member
The data might be wrong
Or
This export growth is just not sustainable.

don't be surprised if next or in 2 years you see a decline in exports.
China's exports are now higher valued added, much more than those low tech from India or Vietnam. Especially, semiconductors and vaccines exports from China will surge over the next couple of years.
 

H2O

Junior Member
Registered Member
Ded
I want to get this off timeline!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Serbia is getting so extremely based it might get a bit excessive
Can you imagine tourists visiting Serbia seeing a full statue of 'Comrade Xi' Hahahaha

Probably not a good idea. Serbia already have a statue of Bruce Lee. It's one thing to have a statue of a celebrity but a statue of a politician is a double edge sword. Maybe they should have a statue of a Chinese dragon or something else that doesn't represent a person.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
As long as any normal person or institution can buy commodities when clearly it is not their line of business thats what happens

Why are investement funds betting on commodity prices getting higher or lower when these commodities are not supposed to be used by them...

American capitalism is very advanced and sophisticated.

We have to go back to the very basics, which is what is the purpose of a market?

The best answer, or one of the best answers, is "price discovery."

A free market will find the correct price, where allocation of resources are the most efficient.

--------- --------- ---------

The function of a futures market is best understood if we are a simple farmer.

We grow the wheat and soybeans expecting a price to be sold at, at a later date, due planting season, growing season, harvest season.

But we got no idea what the future price of the crop would be, so we go to the futures market and lock in a price that we will sell our crop. When the harvest is done in a few months, we make delivery on that commodities futures contract.

If we do not hedge our crop in the futures market, then if the price of the wheat or beans go up, we make a windfall, if it goes down, then President Trump will bail out his friends and the farmer might get some crumbs as he declares bankruptcy again.

------- ------- -------

Okay, only at this point, we can make an effort to comment on your comments.

In the futures market, such as oil for instance, thousands upon thousands of contracts are traded. However, even 1 contract changing hands is very important. Even at 1 contract, it is price discovery, and that 1 contract trading, representing price discovery, allows for entities who trade 1000s of contracts to see where the market is at.

In other words, an active liquid market is best for price discovery.

Going back to the farmer, he is a participant in the market trying to sell his crop in the futures market. There is the bread factory, who needs the wheat, so the factory buys the contract on the futures market. Then an important point is that the market will attract speculators, who will add liquidity and their input, trying to find the correct price.

That is why having all these participants, the seller aka farmer, the buyer aka factory, and the speculator who provides liquidity and their input of where they think the market is going, is critical for the functioning of the commodities futures markets of today. You need all three. Everyone's input is important. Who knows. Maybe someone knows something you don't know.

-------- -------- ---------

Actually the story ends here with the commodities. But the story of our times, is what came next, which was the stock futures index contracts, and bond futures contracts. What happened there, it seemed like that opened the door for all the weird different derivatives that the Wall Street firms trade among themselves, such as Lehman Brothers. Everything on Wall Street became a derivative.

Now, we get to the best part for those right wingers on Wall Street. No one understands what they are doing so, they get away with it. Is this fair. No. It is not. But realistically no one has a clue how to change anything or where to begin.

However, we cannot be concerned with that. We got to protect ourselves. Stay long until the music stops!

[rant] [/rant]

:p
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Can you imagine the Chinese tourists faces when they see the statue on Serbia? Haha

"Damn bro, I thought here in China we like Xi, but look at that. These Serbians must like him even more than us.
Oh look! Lets get a souvenir for the 'Comrade Xi' statue back to China"

Actually, that would be so cool, that would be a great marketing ploy.

Serbia must have some tourist locations.

Since they vaccinated themselves, they could host Chinese tourist again.

When they look at the brochures in China, all they will see is this Xi statue in Serbia, and they would think, WTF?! That is the next vacation abroad.

Let's go!!!

:D
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
American capitalism is very advanced and sophisticated.

We have to go back to the very basics, which is what is the purpose of a market?

The best answer, or one of the best answers, is "price discovery."

A free market will find the correct price, where allocation of resources are the most efficient.

Theoretically yes.

But there are 2 main problems that frequently occur in a completely free market.

1. What is most *profitable* or *efficient* for the participants is not always the *best* outcome for the market or society.

2. Animal spirits prevail in markets.
But even if you disagree with these animal spirits, the most profitable route is to follow the herd but be ready to jump ship as soon as the market turns, thus leaving novices nursing the losses. Otherwise the market remains irrational longer than you can remain solvent. As per studies in the Economist.

That is not *advanced* capitalism. That is just *predatory* capitalism which needs regulation.
 
Top