Hong-Kong Protests

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
Is someone talking hypocrisy here again? It's funny we never hear a peep from them when hypocrisy is perpetrated from the west.

I mean where was any condemnation or ridicule when the recent announcement by U.S. of genocide in Armenia? The good old BBC had a field day showing all those pictures of skeletons.

So let's talk hypocrisy shall we.

FB_IMG_1619507791297.jpg
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
On the topic of hypocrisy and changing the voting laws to silence opposition, a lot of it is a matter of opinion
Here we see BBC "fact check" Georgia voting laws
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Yet that doesn't stop people from criticizing the law as "Jim Crow on steroids"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

More hypocrisy vs. opinion
Remember the cab driver in HK who was called a "murderer" by rioters?
Too bad he wasn't in America...
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Tyler

Captain
Registered Member
Actually it is very normal for HK people to have multiple passports. Even mid-income people have multiple passports. I myself who is in a working class also has two passports. The primary reason is because of difficulty owning a house here or the houses are just too small here in HK for the same price in different country. This is a major issue that the HK government has done too little to solve. So better spread your eggs in different baskets. Almost all business people here has that kind of arrangement. They just want to make money here. There will be no difference with the officials as long as they toe in the line for the central government.
Which passports do you have?
 

KYli

Brigadier
I think the central government regretted that it allowed Hong Kongers especially those legislators, senior government officials to have multiple passports. There are too much leeway for hiring senior government officials such the former Chief of RTHK who did nothing to stop spreading lies and rumor and attacks on the Hong Kong government.

As for hypocrisy, the biggest hypocrisy in HK is those Yes men and Yes women who supported the brutal colonial rules now becoming democratic father and mother of HK.
 

Mr T

Senior Member
As for hypocrisy, the biggest hypocrisy in HK is those Yes men and Yes women who supported the brutal colonial rules now becoming democratic father and mother of HK.
Who are you talking about specifically, and do you have any evidence they publicly supported "brutal" rules during the British rule of Hong Kong? Simply working for the HK government before 1997 wasn't endorsement of everything the government did.

Also, what's wrong with arguing for the law to actually be implemented? A key point of the Basic Law was eventual universal suffrage. Beijing's only proposal for that were elections where it would get to decide the candidates via its proxies in the functional constituencies. Now there's no chance of universal suffrage on the basis of the new rules the CCP is bringing in.
 

canniBUS

Junior Member
Registered Member
Who are you talking about specifically, and do you have any evidence they publicly supported "brutal" rules during the British rule of Hong Kong? Simply working for the HK government before 1997 wasn't endorsement of everything the government did.

Also, what's wrong with arguing for the law to actually be implemented? A key point of the Basic Law was eventual universal suffrage. Beijing's only proposal for that were elections where it would get to decide the candidates via its proxies in the functional constituencies. Now there's no chance of universal suffrage on the basis of the new rules the CCP is bringing in.
Funny how you only bitch about meaningless elections under fake capitalist "democracy" but never support instituting real socialist democracy.
 

Mr T

Senior Member
Funny how you only bitch about meaningless elections under fake capitalist "democracy" but never support instituting real socialist democracy.
I would say people directly voting for candidates that were able to stand without the State blocking them because they had inconvenient political policies is the epitome of democracy.

The idea that it's somehow preferable to have one political party make all the important decisions for a people, like who is allowed to stand for elections, is a joke and is usually only advanced by persons who are insecure and are incapable of having open debates with others, so feel the need to have rules that can stop them from losing.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
I think the central government regretted that it allowed Hong Kongers especially those legislators, senior government officials to have multiple passports. There are too much leeway for hiring senior government officials such the former Chief of RTHK who did nothing to stop spreading lies and rumor and attacks on the Hong Kong government.

As for hypocrisy, the biggest hypocrisy in HK is those Yes men and Yes women who supported the brutal colonial rules now becoming democratic father and mother of HK.
I think an honest assessment of HK from handover till now will see it as a colossal strategic mistake by the west.

HK post reunification was an honest and fair experiment by China to see if the western democratic model had any merit that the rest of China could learn from.

The Chinese government gave them extraordinary freedoms and basically did not meddle at all.

But the self hating racists longing for their blonde haired, fair skinned and blue eye master race masters to return just couldn’t help themselves and went out of their way to spit on China at every opportunity and actively courted western malevolent powers while seized upon any and every opportunity to try to change the status quo and move towards independence. This ultimately resulted in a pre-planned and foreign funded and organised colour revolution attempt using the pretext of a pretty standard and innocuous extradition treaty intended to serve justice as some imaginary power grab by Beijing, as if China needed any pretext or cover to do so if it wanted to ( as evidenced by the national security law that ultimately resulted from this).

The colour revolution was destined to fail and never came remotely close to achieve anything of substance in terms of HK independence. All it did was prove unequivocally to China that the western model is nothing but a poison pill Trojan horse.

If you adopt the Western model, you effectively surrender all power to the west as you will be literally playing their game, which they can and will change the rules at will, and they will shamelessly lie and cheap and twist and hide facts to bury you in an avalanche of shit and drawn out the truth, as happens in the west as a matter of course.

That’s not how anyone remotely rational or moral who isn’t totally brainwashed would want their society ran. So all I can say is well done and thank you to the idiot politicians of the west, for so thoroughly and convincingly discrediting their own model within China. As without this lesson, the self hating racists in China would have continue to be able to make a convincing arguments that China needs to move towards the western model and sway many young naive idealists to their cause.
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
Duh. Just another day and another spin from MSM for the gullible.

What is a Trudeau Visa or is this just the usual but rebranded work-permit visa ? How many applications for work permit are received in a typical year?
A bit late but Trudeau Visa sounds like Trump Vaccine. Electioneering stunt
 

BrightFuture

New Member
Registered Member
Who are you talking about specifically, and do you have any evidence they publicly supported "brutal" rules during the British rule of Hong Kong? Simply working for the HK government before 1997 wasn't endorsement of everything the government did.

Also, what's wrong with arguing for the law to actually be implemented? A key point of the Basic Law was eventual universal suffrage. Beijing's only proposal for that were elections where it would get to decide the candidates via its proxies in the functional constituencies. Now there's no chance of universal suffrage on the basis of the new rules the CCP is bringing in.
Cry louder. Hong Kong is Chinese, get over it.
 
Top