News on China's scientific and technological development.

gadgetcool5

Senior Member
Registered Member
I'm very happy with the plight of SMIC. Necessity is the mother of all inventions. I'd rather have Chinese foundries spend money on Chinese equipment and R&D rather than on US suppliers (who use the profits to further improve their R&D).

This is not me trying to find a silver lining. It's the reality. Sometimes, you need your enemy to show you your weaknesses.

Let's hope that China gets fully independent by 2030.

Independence is not the problem. Anyone can be "fully independent." North Korea can be fully independent.

But China won't have the most advanced fabs due to these sanctions.

SMIC will lose foreign customers, and will lose proportionately more revenue than US fab companies.

Thus China's semiconductor industry will lose proportionately more R&D.

Meanwhile most of the Chinese economy will continue to buy from US suppliers because those are the only ones on the cutting edge.
 

Petrolicious88

Senior Member
Registered Member
when biden will win the elections it will be business as usual with china. Trust me
No it won’t. A Biden win could mean a truce on the trade war, but a continuation of the tech war

That’s the best possible outcome of a Biden win.

US/China relationship has changed forever. There is no going back no matter who wins.

when biden will win the elections it will be business as usual with china. Trust me
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Independence is not the problem. Anyone can be "fully independent." North Korea can be fully independent.

But China won't have the most advanced fabs due to these sanctions.

SMIC will lose foreign customers, and will lose proportionately more revenue than US fab companies.

Thus China's semiconductor industry will lose proportionately more R&D.

Meanwhile most of the Chinese economy will continue to buy from US suppliers because those are the only ones on the cutting edge.
China didn't have the most advanced fabs to being with; they have to develop them. Fully independent and cutting edge is what China is aiming for and there is no reason that China will not get there. If you have a good idea, the Chinese government will fund it; there is no need to be stuck with a catch 22 of not having the funds to develop but needing to be developed to get fund. If the idea is there, China will provide fuel.

At this point, it's understood that buying American is a stop-gap. Nobody in China trusts American tech or suppliers anymore and nobody can accept it as a long-term solution.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Independence is not the problem. Anyone can be "fully independent." North Korea can be fully independent.

But China won't have the most advanced fabs due to these sanctions.

SMIC will lose foreign customers, and will lose proportionately more revenue than US fab companies.

Thus China's semiconductor industry will lose proportionately more R&D.

Meanwhile most of the Chinese economy will continue to buy from US suppliers because those are the only ones on the cutting edge.
hi gadgetcool5

What SMIC gain is a big one....HUAWEI. in the next few years XIAOMI, VIVO AND OTHERS in other words all the chinese tech company
 

Kancil

New Member
Registered Member
when biden will win the elections it will be business as usual with china. Trust me
But looks like Trump is a better politician than Biden, and there is an even chance that he will win the presidential race. With Trump in the second term, more restrictions on technology sales China is in order. The Chinese need not do anything to suppress American companies in China. Trump would cede American market share in China to Chinese companies and help China build-up the semi-conductor supply chain.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
Thus China's semiconductor industry will lose proportionately more R&D.

Meanwhile most of the Chinese economy will continue to buy from US suppliers because those are the only ones on the cutting edge.

That is not accurate.

You assume that Chinese companies will rely on sales revenue to fund R&D into semiconductors.

What the technology war on China has created is a huge market for semiconductors developed and manufactured without any US technology.

So R&D spending for Chinese semiconductors will come from the government and venture capital, not from sales revenue.
This funding will be looking at timeframes over 5 years where operating losses are fully expected.

For example, Amazon made losses for 14 years, but there was no loss of faith because everyone knew they were going to have a huge amount of sales and profits in the future. Amazon are now worth $1570 Billion.

Other examples include Uber, Didi, Alibaba, Tencent, Facebook, Tesla, SpaceX etc

So I am absolutely confident in saying that in 10 years time, China will have a huge domestic market for semiconductor products with zero US technology content.

As I said before, the US technology war is a stupid short-term move.
 

Kancil

New Member
Registered Member
That is not accurate.

You assume that Chinese companies will rely on sales revenue to fund R&D into semiconductors.

What the technology war on China has created is a huge market for semiconductors developed and manufactured without any US technology.

So R&D spending for Chinese semiconductors will come from the government and venture capital, which is looking at timeframes over 5 years where losses are expected.

For example, Amazon made losses for 14 years, but there was no loss of faith because everyone knew they were going to have a huge amount of sales and profits in the future. Amazon are now worth $1570 Billion.

Other examples include Uber, Didi, Alibaba, Tencent, Facebook, Tesla, SpaceX etc

So I am absolutely confident in saying that in 10 years time, China will have a huge domestic semiconductor industry with no US technology content.

As I said before, this is a stupid move on the part of the USA.
That is right. Let Uncle Sam cede market share in China so that a virtuous cycle can begin in China where rising profits can be plough back for R&D to further improve design efficiency and sales which further increase profit.
 

BrightFuture

New Member
Registered Member
Quick question since you're Portugese: did China buy your country's electricity grid? I remember hearing something about that a while back, but you're just so small and insignificant that I never bothered following up on it.

You guys keep assuming that this guy is Portuguese, I tried to challenge him and he didn't answer. Spanish and Portuguese understand each other almost perfectly (at least when we write), the fact that he didn't answer indicates there is a very high possibility that this guy is just some troll. I guess he must be Indian, only Indians have so much free time
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
Looks like SMIC is not actually on the Entity List.

The US is *warning* US suppliers they can't ship controlled items to SMIC, which could be for military use.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top