Hong-Kong Protests

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
I see you still do not understand what is wrong, I guess it is about character or lack thereof. Anyway carry on as I've wasted enough time.

Exactly, it's like me saying to my students. If you know you have done wrong, then you know your rights from wrongs, and as such we can move on.

But if you don't you done wrong, then no matter how much I puff an huff, you just don't know your rights from wrongs.

Therefore its a waste of time trying to convince you of it.
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
After all the news bruhaha and publicity blaming the police, not even one of the MSM is interested in finding the truth but instead serving as propaganda tool for activist with agenda. What value does press provide other than as a brainwashing tool?

The story surrounding the lost of an eye is really intr
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



傷右眼女發律師信反對交資料予警
2019/09/08 09:11
八一一尖沙咀衝突中右眼受傷的女子,警方早前指取得法庭手令,正向醫管局索取醫療記錄,據了解,事主發了律師信,反對醫院交出資料,警方仍未看到報告。

八月十一日尖沙咀衝突,一名女子右眼受傷。究竟她的傷勢是怎樣造成,當事人在片段中沒有透露,警方指調查了近一個月仍未確定到。警方早前指透過法庭手令,取得醫療記錄就能進一步釐清事實。

消息指,警方先後兩次向法庭申請手令,向醫管局索取醫療記錄,第一次因未掌握到傷者個人資料,院方處理不到,到上星期第二次取得手令,要求醫管局交資料,警方現時仍未看到記錄。

為何未看到?據了解,女子早前委託了律師去信醫管局反對醫院交出記錄,醫管局回覆表示,公立醫院有既定程序處理索取醫療記錄的申請,未得到病人同意不宜評論。

A woman who was injured in the right eye in the riot at Tsim Sha Tsui on Aug 11. HKPF earlier pointed out that it had obtained a court warrant and was seeking medical records from the Hospital Authority. It is understood that the victim issued a letter of attorney against handing over of the the medical records. The police still did not see the report. .

A woman was injured in the right eye in the conflict at Tsim Sha Tsui on August 11. What caused her injury? The women did not disclose the cause of the injury in the footage of an interview. The police said that its investigation has not been able to pinpoint the cause of injury for nearly a month. The police earlier pointed out that through the court warrants, medical records can be used to further clarify the facts.

According to the news, the police applied to the court twice for the medical records from the Hospital Authority. The first time, because the personal data of the injured person was not available, the hospital could not handle it. The second time last week, a warrant was obtained. The information still has not been received by the police.

Why didn't police see it? It is understood that the woman had previously entrusted a lawyer to the Hospital Authority to oppose the hospital's surrender of records. The Hospital Authority replied that the public hospital had an established procedure for processing medical records, and it was not appropriate to comment without the patient's consent.

This "blinding" is really intriguing and turned out to be quite an embarrassment to the rioters. Especially when at the time, they milked it for all its worth. And now, none of the MSM ever dare report on it.

Least we forget how the MSM milked it, and with the cooperation of the hospital staff! Especially disappointing when some of these medican staff knows that it was the ballbearing fired from her own side that did the damage.

HonkKong_632.jpg
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
I initially also made that mistake because it is very easy to make. As all of the rioters are young people, it is easy to assume that all the young people are rioters and they represent young people. But as we saw evidence later of other young people fighting them and people in high school raising and saluting the Chinese flag, the picture become more multi-dimensional. All (or most) rioters are young but actually very few young people are rioters. It's easy to lose track of that simply because they are the loudest people garnering the most media attention.

That is a good recommendation for you to make to your own government. We Chinese choose to handle our affairs with a different strategy. Just because China is large, it doesn't mean we throw away territory; just because someone is rich, it does not mean he should squander his wealth. In China, we unite territories; we do not move in the opposite way. And even though there may be some teething issues, we rise up and overcome obstacles instead of giving up. That is the Chinese way to progress and growth. Hong Kong is a Chinese territory; Chinese people have the right to go there and its fate is decided by all of China, not just the small group of people who live there.

Typical MSM trash from him. Since when majority of people don't want to be Chinese?

Also, speaking like MSM, by saying China should "let Hong Kong have their genuine autonomy". As if, Hong Kong doesn't have it. Lol. Hong Kong Have more autonomy than they ecer did in the past 150 years of British rule. Another inconvient truth he didn't seem to know about.

He really should do more research before opening up on this forum!
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
I would have respected your holier-than-thou BS if your country respects Kashimiries’ wishes and return Sikkim to its original people

And don't forget Goa, and to a lesser extent, Buhtan, Sri lanker, and to lesser extent, Bangaladesh (East Parkistan) and least we forget, Southern Tibet!

It's rather intriguing that India invaded more sovereign states than anyone outside the western world. Yet the western government and their respective MSM turns a blind eye!
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
Sikkim people are very happy to be part of India and their is no issue their.

That's some arrogance in that one statement alone!

Invaded someone, (don't forget they didn't invite you in with open arms) subjugate someone, then say to all in here that Sikkims are very happy to be part of India!

The arrogance is beyond compare!
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
Just because you know a few Chinese and visited China, you think you understand China now. Quiet an ego you have. I studied and worked with plenty of Indians over the years and I would never have claimed i know India

Like I said, the arrogance is beyond compare!
 

KIENCHIN

Junior Member
Registered Member
That's some arrogance in that one statement alone!

Invaded someone, (don't forget they didn't invite you in with open arms) subjugate someone, then say to all in here that Sikkims are very happy to be part of India!

The arrogance is beyond compare!
Don’t forget Punjab where there is a ongoing separatist movement.
 
Top