China's strategy in Korean peninsula

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


BEIJING (Reuters) - China will pay the biggest price from the new United Nations sanctions against North Korea because of its close economic relationship with the country, but will always enforce the resolutions, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said.

The United Nations Security Council unanimously imposed new sanctions on North Korea on Saturday that could slash its $3 billion annual export revenue by a third.

Speaking at a regional security forum in Manila on Monday, Wang said the new resolution showed China and the international community's opposition to North Korea's continued missile tests, the foreign ministry said in a statement on Tuesday.

"Owing to China's traditional economic ties with North Korea, it will mainly be China paying the price for implementing the resolution," the statement cited Wang as saying.

"But in order to protect the international non-proliferation system and regional peace and stability, China will as before fully and strictly properly implement the entire contents of the relevant resolution."

China has repeatedly said it is committed to enforcing increasingly tough U.N. resolutions on North Korea, though it has also said what it terms "normal" trade and ordinary North Koreans should not be affected.

The latest U.N. resolution bans North Korean exports of coal, iron, iron ore, lead, lead ore and seafood. It also prohibits countries from increasing the numbers of North Korean laborers currently working abroad, bans new joint ventures with North Korea and any new investment in current joint ventures.

DOOR TO DISCUSSIONS?

Wang said that apart from the new sanctions, the resolution also made clear that the six party talks process, a stalled dialogue mechanism with North Korea that also includes Russia and Japan, should be restarted.

China appreciated comments earlier this month by U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson that the United States does not seek to topple the North Korean government and would like dialogue with Pyongyang at some point, Wang added.

The United States does not seek regime change, the collapse of the regime, an accelerated reunification of the peninsula or an excuse to send the U.S. military into North Korea, Tillerson said.

Wang said Tillerson's "Four Nos" promise was a positive signal.

China "hopes North Korea can echo this signal from the United States", Wang added.

Speaking at the same forum on Monday, Tillerson held a door open for dialogue with North Korea saying Washington was willing to talk to Pyongyang if it halted a series of recent missile test launches.

North Korea said the latest sanctions infringed its sovereignty and it was ready to give Washington a "severe lesson" with its strategic nuclear force in response to any U.S. military action.

The successful testing of two intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) last month suggested the reclusive North was making technical progress, Japan's annual Defence White Paper warned.

"Since last year, when it forcibly implemented two nuclear tests and more than 20 ballistic missile launches, the security threats have entered a new stage," the Japanese Defence Ministry said in the 563-page document released on Tuesday.

"It is conceivable that North Korea's nuclear weapons program has already considerably advanced and it is possible that North Korea has already achieved the miniaturization of nuclear weapons and has acquired nuclear warheads," it said.

South Korea reiterated further resolutions against Pyongyang could follow if it did not pull back.

"North Korea should realise if it doesn't stop its nuclear, missile provocations it will face even stronger pressure and sanctions," Defence Ministry spokesman Moon Sang-gyun told a regular news briefing. "We warn North Korea not to test or misunderstand the will of the South Korea-U.S. alliance."
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Perhaps China may use a moment of respite from the Korean crisis to fully focus on the Sino-Indian border situation. If indeed China has made a deal with the U.S on North Korea, India will have a major reckoning at hand, a total Chinese focus on India would be like the proverbial 'Deer in the Headlights' moment for India. Lol
In other words,
main-qimg-6001142b467089568c28547af8aa5abb
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China appreciated comments earlier this month by U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson that the United States does not seek to topple the North Korean government and would like dialogue with Pyongyang at some point, Wang added.

The United States does not seek regime change, the collapse of the regime, an accelerated reunification of the peninsula or an excuse to send the U.S. military into North Korea, Tillerson said.

The real winner is North Korea and China, with Washington promising NOT to regime change the DPRK and is finally willing to sit and talk to them.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
What Tillerson said was what NK always demanded and recently also by China, a final non-aggression settlement of the Korean war.

We will have to wait and see if Trump is going to or able to deliver what Tillerson said. I am saying "able" is because there are so many political factions in US who just want to take whatever chances and whatever subjects to be against their president regardless the what matter is on the table, Medicare or NK missile are same to them.

I see an obstacle already (naturally) that needs time to be overcome, Tillerson demand NK to stop missile test FIRST for talk to be started WITHOUT promising a pause of US&SK joint exercise. It is something NK is not going to accept. NK is surely not going to let itself to be seen as bulge in front of fresh sanction, so it will take some time and some kind of US "promise" of downsizing future exercise for the talk to begin.

By all means, I see Tillerson's words is a good first step to the right direction, but far from close to any breakthrough.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
LOL Was he trying to parallel FDR's threat to Japan before nuking Hiroshima? I started laughing when he said "fire and fury" the second time and then added, "... and power!" Haha

Everyone always compared Trump to Kim Jong Un for good reason. Now he's really put himself in the same boat, making empty threats to set other countries on fire. As long as China stands ready, the only fire and fury is gonna be coming out of his mouth. He would have been much smarter to just say, "North Korean threats will always be empty as long as American power is there to stop them." Then he would have made Kim look full of hot air.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
I saw a clip of FOX News explaining to it viewers what happened in the Korean War. All they did was say North Korea invaded into South Korea and the US and allies beat them back to the original border. Why didn't they mention how the US pushed North Korea into nothingness squeezing them up against the Chinese border? That would've gotten their viewers excited. But then they would have to explain why the borders went back to the 38th parallel. Don't mention the Chinese part just like North Korea doesn't.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
I saw a clip of FOX News explaining to it viewers what happened in the Korean War. All they did was say North Korea invaded into South Korea and the US and allies beat them back to the original border. Why didn't they mention how the US pushed North Korea into nothingness squeezing them up against the Chinese border? That would've gotten their viewers excited. But then they would have to explain why the borders went back to the 38th parallel. Don't mention the Chinese part just like North Korea doesn't.
Please the network is the US government mouth piece we're talking here and the average American audiences are not that smart when it comes to history of any kind.
 

Richard Santos

Captain
Registered Member
The real winner is North Korea and China, with Washington promising NOT to regime change the DPRK and is finally willing to sit and talk to them.

That kind of promise can be made and unmade three times in one hour.

Also, negotiation between the US and DPRK will never amount to anything unless it involves establishement of normal diplomatic relationship between DPRK and the US. The latter will be vehemently opposed by South Korea as it would appear to put permanent separation of North and South Korea on a legal footing.
 
Last edited:
Top