J-20... The New Generation Fighter

Status
Not open for further replies.

Subedei

Banned Idiot
Re: New Generation Fighter

The rear engine layout does suggest -to me- that some design elements could be influenced by the Mig 1.42/1.44.

Just an observation!!!
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Re: New Generation Fighter

jqnpn7.jpg

HOLY SH*T that's sexy... omg so awesome. Love the green glow of the HUD as well. :D
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Re: New Generation Fighter

I don't think it's real. These are obviously models shot from a distance.

I demand to see Barak Obama sitting in the pilot's seat with Hu Jintao opening the canopy from the outside. This must be all be video taped with Obama touching the plane while making a statement claiming that this plane is operational.

Lol for a moment there you nearly got me. Nice

The rear engine layout does suggest -to me- that some design elements could be influenced by the Mig 1.42/1.44.

Just an observation!!!

The thing is that the J-20's current engine lay out and the Mig 1.44's is no different to many other twin engine planes :/
 

Subedei

Banned Idiot
Re: New Generation Fighter

The thing is that the J-20's current engine lay out and the Mig 1.44's is no different to many other twin engine planes :/

Precisely! Similar to many other 3rd, 4th, and 4.5th generation twin engine aircraft, and NOT similar to 5th generation (using western nomenclature, that is).

I guess I just expected that the airframe would taper toward the rear as the F-22 and T-50 do.

It doesn't! So, I'll stop riding a dead horse.
 
Last edited:

Subedei

Banned Idiot
Re: New Generation Fighter

I am very interested in seeing the top view of this plane. I'm really expecting that to illustrate more influences of the Mig 1.42/1.44.
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Re: New Generation Fighter

Precisely! Similar to many other 3rd, 4th, and 4.5th generation twin engine aircraft, and NOT similar to 5th generation (using western nomenclature, that is).

I guess I just expected that the airframe would taper toward the rear as the F-22 and T-50 do.

It doesn't! So, I'll stop riding a dead horse.

Well I personally think the rear end doesn't look very different from the F-22, only the F-22 has its unique TVC nozzles. If it had conventional nozzles then it wouldn't look very different to the J-20 as it is now.

I am very interested in seeing the top view of this plane. I'm really expecting that to illustrate more influences of the Mig 1.42/1.44.

That's kind of like pointing out similarities between the J-10 and Eurofighter or Gripen or Rafale or Lavi or what not. Just a warning that quite a few people here get annoyed with baseless comparisons.

Unless you actually think the J-20 was influenced by the Mig 1.44, it's probably wiser not to risk the fury of some of the SDF members :)
 

gullible

Junior Member
Re: New Generation Fighter

I think that's the rumored NATO designation -- I doubt it's authentic though.
Also sounds too much like "firefox" for my taste. I hope the PLAAF give J-20 a good name. Something cool but not overly aggressive.

the chinese calls it the 4th lady....
 

MwRYum

Major
Re: New Generation Fighter

I am very interested in seeing the top view of this plane. I'm really expecting that to illustrate more influences of the Mig 1.42/1.44.

Aren't we all.

The problem is when'd it go first flight? Once it does we can then see how the weapon bays gonna be. If even the mainland newspapers (though that ain't the People's Daily) get the trickle of info out and mainland BBS are flooding with news of it, would CAC/PLAAF pull a stunt by having it first flight in New Year's Day?

However with all the saying going around the plane/engine combo is not yet finalized (waiting for WS-15?), new engines with - if so - TVC capacity could change the equation somewhat, unless this prototype has reserved space and weight for that already.

As to J-20 keep the guns, guns were old but still a reliable tool of trade, even the F-22 keeps the M-61.
 

Martian

Senior Member
Re: New Generation Fighter

Well I personally think the rear end doesn't look very different from the F-22, only the F-22 has its unique TVC nozzles. If it had conventional nozzles then it wouldn't look very different to the J-20 as it is now.



That's kind of like pointing out similarities between the J-10 and Eurofighter or Gripen or Rafale or Lavi or what not. Just a warning that quite a few people here get annoyed with baseless comparisons.

Unless you actually think the J-20 was influenced by the Mig 1.44, it's probably wiser not to risk the fury of some of the SDF members :)

I wholeheartedly support Bltizo's post and am in full agreement. We don't like people that try to annoy us without hard evidence.
 

Subedei

Banned Idiot
Re: New Generation Fighter

Unless you actually think the J-20 was influenced by the Mig 1.44, it's probably wiser not to risk the fury of some of the SDF members :)

Thanks for the advice!

Not sure that my comparison is baseless, just 'cause you say it is. It's based in seeking to condiser possible design influences on the J-20. Sometimes, we might consider that other's persopectives just might be as valid as ours. But, that requires humility, and I understand that humility is not generally characteristic of those who trace their cultural ancestry to the BRITISH EMPIRE!!! ;) Thanks to the J-20, that may soon change!!!

Being that my tradition encourages individuals to value their own perceptions and experiences, and honors those who have the courage to be themselves in the face of criticism, I'll stick to my observations and suffer whatever comes. I don't harbor those insecurites which compel some to comform to popular opinion. I'm not a Victorian, and I'm not a middle-class consumer! ;)

Sorry not to let you limit my possibilities. Kind'a wonder why you feel the need to???;(
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top