Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009
The JF-17 has a TWR of 0.99 with full fuel.So surely, if its half filled with fuel, it will have a much higher TWR. However, in order to go vertically up, you need (TWR-drag)>1.
Strangely enough even though JF-17 is an export fighter, not everything about it is known. Both official sources (CAC or PAC) do not have a complete specs and the ones havent been updated for ages. Maybe because fighter jet customers will directly contact the company and unlikely to a website to read a brochure or watch a promotional video.
JF-17 has yet to perform tricks in an Air Show so its yet to be seen what it can (or cannot) do. Lets hope it appears in the next Zhuhai Air Show and demonstrates whats up its sleeves.
Btw, any latest news of the WS-13 engine?
In order to do a steep climb like that, you need to have a higher TWR than 1:1 at that moment. I think if it was possible for JF-17 to have more than 1:1 TWR at anytime, in any config (e.g. low fuel) then they would have advertised the crap out of it as "higher than 1:1 TWR!". Given that the aircraft is mainly geared for export, I doubt they would hide any specs that make it look good.
The JF-17 has a TWR of 0.99 with full fuel.So surely, if its half filled with fuel, it will have a much higher TWR. However, in order to go vertically up, you need (TWR-drag)>1.
Strangely enough even though JF-17 is an export fighter, not everything about it is known. Both official sources (CAC or PAC) do not have a complete specs and the ones havent been updated for ages. Maybe because fighter jet customers will directly contact the company and unlikely to a website to read a brochure or watch a promotional video.
JF-17 has yet to perform tricks in an Air Show so its yet to be seen what it can (or cannot) do. Lets hope it appears in the next Zhuhai Air Show and demonstrates whats up its sleeves.
Btw, any latest news of the WS-13 engine?