Type 055 DDG Large Destroyer Thread

Discussion in 'Navy' started by FarkTypeSoldier, Jul 8, 2013.

  1. Jura
    Offline

    Jura General

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    22,035
    Likes Received:
    27,036
    ... and I see the main point this way:

    the simple classification
    disputed (inconsistencies; counter-examples)

    an interesting read anyway!
     
  2. delft
    Offline

    delft Brigadier

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    6,750
    Makes sense. I remember two sailors being killed on the foredeck of a RN Leander class frigate in the Mediterranean by a freak wave about half a century ago.
     
  3. damitch300
    Offline

    damitch300 Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    300
    Thetis class also has this for the crew.
     
  4. kwaigonegin
    Offline

    kwaigonegin Colonel

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Messages:
    4,363
    Likes Received:
    5,167
    I think my original post was lost in all the clutter of proceeding posts arguing what is essentially semantics. LOL

    I believe that ships like the 055, FREMM etc uses what is now 'standardized' building designs for new ship's mast which is enclosed. They certainly do offer a somewhat reduce RCS however it is certainly not a reduction where the entire ship can be reclassified as a new 'stealth' warship since these ships are not purposefully design to be all aspect stealth like the Zumwalt where stealth was considered a big part of the design requirements.

    Perhaps if you compare just the masts then I agree that these modern enclosed masts can technically/categorically be considered a newer generation but not when taken the ship in it's entirety.

    The bigger and more practical question that needs to be asked is (since we're talking warships here) will the reduction in the mast's RCS make any noticeable difference in the return RF from a modern day radar?

    My personal opinion is no, not really. The 055 will light up almost the same as a Burke or any other warships with traditional 'open' mast and antennas. Like I said unless the other ship uses 1950s or 1960s search radar it doesn't really make much of a difference.

    Personally I think a ship can only be considered a newer 'generation' of stealth IF all or most of her sensors, panels etc are truly integrated into the superstructure like the Zumwalt and all external mounts, protrusions etc are purposely hidden like gun mounts, barrels, CIWS etc.

    RCS reduction is always considered in most modern warship designs however it is not the primary design requirement UNLESS specifically stated so like the Zumwalt.
     
    Equation and PanAsian like this.
  5. jacksprat
    Offline

    jacksprat New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2012
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    39
    I sometimes wonder about at this RCS reduction stuff, especially as it relates to the type 055 program, which is going be a pretty large platform which will be hard to to minimize. It seems to my very simple mind that enclosed masts, shaped hulls also add as much value to fuel efficiency via less wind and water resistance as much as lessening radar returns. sort of the same way they design cars for fuel savings and increases in performance. may have to do with both issues.
     
    Equation likes this.
  6. Iron Man
    Offline

    Iron Man Captain
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2015
    Messages:
    2,856
    Likes Received:
    2,510
    It wasn't really a semantics discussion at all. If you really want to talk semantics however, then we need to carefully differentiate between "enclosed" masts and "integrated" masts. Enclosed masts shield a conventional rotating radar by surrounding it within a radar absorbent mast structure. Integrated masts use flat panel antennae/radars in multiple frequencies that fit flush on the sloping wall of the mast. Incidentally, the Horizon, Daring, and Aquitaine/FREMM classes have NEITHER of these types of masts. They all also have no net topside clutter reduction because every sensor they need is present and exposed topside in one form or another, whether that be the main mast, the secondary mast, or the weather deck.

    Here is an "enclosed" mast:

    Encloseed Mast.jpg


    Here is an "integrated" mast:

    Integrated Mast.jpg


    IMO the 055 most likely will either have a semi-integrated mast, i.e. some structures will be sunk into the mast and made flush with it, while other structures may still stick out or sit on top of the forward deckhouse, or it will just be a straight up conventional mast.

    055 Mast.jpg


    IMO the degree of stealth achieved by the Zumwalt is probably not worth the cost, and I have to agree with Jura that situational awareness in the Western Pacific and South China Sea may soon evolve into a state of mutual awareness where both sides know where each other's ships are most or even all of the time. Individual ship stealth is still useful in this case however because of its benefits against radar-guided antiship missiles in the terminal homing phase. I don't think we're ever going back to a time with vertically-sloped warships getting built.
     
    delft, FORBIN and Equation like this.
  7. Jura
    Offline

    Jura General

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    22,035
    Likes Received:
    27,036
    LOL! I thought I would get ignored completely after
    ... but there's a sort of reaction in:
    not useful against IR anyway (by the way according to F-35 sales talk F-35Cs may get the Norwegian NSM AShM), so to cut the long story short, I think it's an ILLUSION to try to hide at sea these days (the Bismarck didn't make it to Brest, did she? LOL) and the USN outsmarted itself with the Zumwalts (it's not just "stealth":
    Yesterday at 6:14 PM
    plus they ran out of resources:

    a little bit
    Sep 9, 2014
    big way
    Nov 7, 2016
    ) and I think the Chinese with Type 055 may find a good cost/performance by not trying to 'transform the battlefield' :)

    EDIT
    oh and just not to forget how INNOVATIVE Western Navies can now be:
    Nov 16, 2016
    (that Friday at 8:42 PM
    links to Jane's in case one thought I had posted some tabloid info)
     
    #2467 Jura, Nov 23, 2016
    Last edited: Nov 23, 2016
    perfume, delft, Equation and 2 others like this.
  8. delft
    Offline

    delft Brigadier

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    6,750
    OT
    I've no time to follow many threads and Zumwalt is one of the neglected ones. But if money is lacking for shells for its big guns it would be better to take those out. That would leave a weight allowance for plenty of 57 mm or even 120 mm close in guns. :)
     
  9. Jura
    Offline

    Jura General

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    22,035
    Likes Received:
    27,036
    care to comment on this one:
    [​IMG]
    ?
    (it's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PPA,_Pattugliatori_Polivalenti_d'Altura
    I know you know, the link is for delft :)
     
  10. Jura
    Offline

    Jura General

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    22,035
    Likes Received:
    27,036
    your kidding reminded me of an interesting question, which I posed where it would be on topic
    https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/modern-ciws-anti-missile-systems-deployed-and-in-development.t4350/
    Modern CIWS & Anti-Missile Systems (Deployed and in development)
     
    delft likes this.
Loading...

Share This Page