Yuan Class AIP & Kilo Submarine Thread

A.Man

Major
Re: PLAN Yuan Class D/E AIP Submarine Thread

Up for Americans

230A_zps5eb022d3.jpg~original


230B_zps1f066a86.jpg~original


104523r8jjay66kkggctk8_zps526aea1b.jpg


U.S. Navy admiral says he’s open to idea of giving Chinese Navy tour of carrier

July 17: Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert departs the Chinese Datong FFG 580 with the ship's commanding officer after touring the ship. Greenert said military relations between the U.S. Navy and China have improved.U.S. NAVY


top U.S. Navy official said he is "receptive" to idea of letting his Chinese crewmen tour a U.S. aircraft carrier based in Japan, but experts warn such access could be a risky intelligence giveaway.

Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert, chief of naval operations, told The Wall Street Journal that his Chinese counterpart mentioned the idea of a U.S. carrier crew touring its lone Liaoning carrier and a Chinese crew touring the USS George Washington.


"I'm receptive to that idea," Greenert, who saw the Liaoning and other Chinese ships on a recent trip, told the paper.

Nan Li, an associate professor in the U.S. Naval War College's China Maritime Studies Institute, however, said Beijing would likely benefit more from a tour than the U.S. Navy.

"In theory, they (China) could see some of the ship's technology," he said. Li, however, also said the U.S. could gain from a tour of the Chinese carrier launched in 2012.

"We would be able to see how far behind their ship is compared to ours, and can demonstrate to them how powerful their ship is, and maybe they would respect it," he said.

The discussion between navy officials comes at a sensitive time in China-U.S. relations. China has recently made assertive moves in the South China Sea, like deploying an oil rig in the disputed waters. The U.S. finds itself in a difficult position. It would like to strengthen ties with Beijing, without jeopardizing its standing with smaller allies in the region concerned about a Chinese power-grab.

The Journal's report said U.S. law forbids any cooperation with the Chinese military that may risk military knowledge.

Greenert played down the significance of a possible tour and said the idea is not "revolutionary." He told the paper Chinese military have been taken on board carriers for years. Recently, Chinese Navy officers visited the USS Ronald Reagan, while at sea, during naval drills off Hawaii.

But that drill may have inadvertently displayed the fragile and complex relations between the two countries. When China took part in the exercise, Beijing reportedly sent an uninvited spy ship to monitor the drills.

Li said the fact China sent a spy ship to monitor the drills illustrates the fragile relationship.

"It's a contradiction," he said. "China shows it wants to cooperate, but by sending that spy ship, it shows hostility," he said.

No decision was made, but the move could happen within a year if policymakers on both sides support the idea. Greenert left China on Friday after holding an 'all-hands' call with a Chinese crew about various topics like port visits and his view of women in the service.

"We're talking more. They're speaking English. It's a civil tone -- it's good," he said.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

no_name

Colonel
Re: PLAN Yuan Class D/E AIP Submarine Thread

Jonathan William "Jon" Greenert (born May 15, 1953) United States Navy Admiral currently serving as the 30th Chief of Naval Operations.

from Wiki.

That is a big Brass and the visit is of importance (?). Heard he also visited Liaoning.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Re: PLAN Yuan Class D/E AIP Submarine Thread

OUTSTANDING seamanship by the CO & crew of the 372 boat. Bravo Zulu!(Well Done)

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China has honoured a submarine captain for averting an underwater "emergency" after his crew reportedly saved the vessel from sinking into waters thousands of metres deep, in a rare disclosure of a near-disaster.

Beijing has been increasing its naval might and reach in recent years, and it is an unusual admission for China's military, which President Xi Jinping regularly urges to strengthen its ability to "win battles".

Wang Hongli, commander of submarine 372, was praised by the Central Military Commission for "successfully dealing with a major sudden dangerous situation" during an underwater mission, the military's official People's Liberation Army Daily reported.

The crew "overcame various difficulties... and created a miracle in China's and the world's submarine history", said the report posted on the defence ministry website Wednesday, without specifying any details.

Submarine 372 is reportedly a diesel-electric Kilo-class vessel that went into service in 2006 after Beijing bought it from Moscow.

In April the PLA Daily reported that the submarine had been hit by a sudden change in water density while patrolling in an area of the sea "thousands of metres deep".

Pipes in the main engine room were damaged by the increased water pressure and the vessel began sinking rapidly after losing power, it said.

Wang and his crew reacted quickly, according to the report, shutting down nearly 100 valves and switches and operating dozens of controls -- all within three minutes -- before steering the submarine out of danger.

The crew risked their lives to "prove their loyalty", Wu Shengli, commander of the PLA Navy, was quoted as saying.

Military accidents and equipment malfunctions are rarely reported in China, where news about the armed forces is tightly controlled.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Re: PLAN Yuan Class D/E AIP Submarine Thread

Not to criticize but I really do not think they did it to prove their "Loyalty" since if they failed they would have met the same fate as the boat.

Exactly..Ahh... what would they do but save the boat? That is part of those shipmates job.

A lot is lost in the translation I assure you.

"prove their loyalty"

Perhaps this is better.....Proved they were all well trained and put that training to use in an emergency situation.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Re: PLAN Yuan Class D/E AIP Submarine Thread

Sounds more like a translation error. Whether its innocent or deliberate is another matter.

There is a semi-racist tendency in western media to deliberately use misleadingly literal translations of certain phases to take things out context as a means to mock and/or perpetuate certain negative stereotypes/misconceptions when it comes to reporting no China.
 

JayBird

Junior Member
Re: PLAN Yuan Class D/E AIP Submarine Thread

Sounds more like a translation error. Whether its innocent or deliberate is another matter.

There is a semi-racist tendency in western media to deliberately use misleadingly literal translations of certain phases to take things out context as a means to mock and/or perpetuate certain negative stereotypes/misconceptions when it comes to reporting no China.

Agree, the western media seems to have a tendency of portraying an image of any Chinese patriots as brainwashed slogan yelling communist with a redbook in hand a lot times.

I do hope the PLAN and USN can tour each other's SSBN with trust some day without fear and suspicion of each other in the future. :)
 

solarz

Brigadier
Re: PLAN Yuan Class D/E AIP Submarine Thread

Sounds more like a translation error. Whether its innocent or deliberate is another matter.

There is a semi-racist tendency in western media to deliberately use misleadingly literal translations of certain phases to take things out context as a means to mock and/or perpetuate certain negative stereotypes/misconceptions when it comes to reporting no China.

Here's a more detailed report in Chinese:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


No mention of "proving loyalty" anywhere. Just lots of praise about courage and training, typical military stuff.

Note that this incident actually happened back in January.

There are several other inaccuracies in the Yahoo article. The sub wasn't patrolling in an "area thousands of meters deep", the original Chinese text says the sub met a sudden change in water density, causing the sub to sink thousands of meters deep (and ostensibly thus causing the emergency). Big difference between the two meanings.
 

JayBird

Junior Member
Re: PLAN Yuan Class D/E AIP Submarine Thread

Here's a more detailed report in Chinese:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


No mention of "proving loyalty" anywhere. Just lots of praise about courage and training, typical military stuff.

Note that this incident actually happened back in January.

There are several other inaccuracies in the Yahoo article. The sub wasn't patrolling in an "area thousands of meters deep", the original Chinese text says the sub met a sudden change in water density, causing the sub to sink thousands of meters deep (and ostensibly thus causing the emergency). Big difference between the two meanings.

The Yahoo article was poorly written and misleading people thinking the Chinese were saying their sub was patroling or sinking into thousands meters deep and the crew still managed to save the sub. Which was impossible for a Kilo to survive with only max depth of 300 meters. It's correct the Chinese article didn't mention anything of" proving loyalty".

But the Chinese article did mentioned the sub was patroling in an area thousands of meters deep, (the area was thousands of meter deep, NOT the sub, that's what confused most people when reading fast)the sub itself was cruising at hundred(s) meters deep when the incident happened. If the crew didn't react quick and professional, the sub would've sunk thousands of meters deep.
 
Top