What the Heck?! Thread (Closed)

Status
Not open for further replies.

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General

You don't need to be a dictatorship to want overwhelming sway in one's own region and beyond. And that's why they ring the alarm bells when China is just talking to countries in Africa and Latin America. Sense of China encroaching on what they see as theirs?

I watch the TV show Madame Secretary. What's so vomiting about the show is they blatantly rewrite history. They take real world recent events and give them the most romanticized spin in favor of the US even though in real life it was a mess and made the US look bad. Last week's show the main character who's Secretary of the State went on a humanitarian trip to Africa. They portrayed China as being desperate following around the Secretary of State throughout Africa but beating the US to the punch by throwing more cash out at African countries. The US couldn't beat China's wallet so the Secretary of State devised a plan where they would act like they were going to help an African country in need that they weren't planning to visit in the first place by declaring they were going to do this and that and then China would come in and beat them with more money than the US was never going to give in the first place. So the US was willing to sacrifice "credit" just as long this African country was going get the help it needed. The mistake the producers of the show forgot was the US didn't need to beat China in anything if it were truly a selfless humanitarian mission. Why would China beat the US and the US would come out of it with nothing if they were only out to help people and get nothing in return? Biden accuses China and others of acting on their own interests and not anyone else's? In real life they wouldn't be in Africa if China wasn't there doing what they would've never done like build roads they thought of as a waste of money because Africa was always going to be backwards. Remember how they made a big deal that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was the first top cabinet person from the US government to visit South Pacific island nations? Clinton's trip would've never happened if the Chinese President hadn't visited them right before. So who's the one that desperately follows the other country around?
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
It's about numbers, not remorse. And it's a fact that the number of people who were killed in Nanjing in the winter of 1937 grew year by year in PRC distributed sources after the war. And many historians think that the number was much lower than the one you see in the article as well.
Not sure about your claim of Abe not being remorseful, but putting that aside, most historians frame the murdered victims at 50,000 to 300,000. That's a huge difference, and we probably will never know what the more accurate number is.

What figures are you talking about when you say "many" historians think the massacre was lower? And what exactly do you mean by "many?" Do you mean dozens? Hundreds?
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Not sure about your claim of Abe not being remorseful, but putting that aside, most historians frame the murdered victims at 50,000 to 300,000. That's a huge difference, and we probably will never know what the more accurate number is.

What figures are you talking about when you say "many" historians think the massacre was lower? And what exactly do you mean by "many?" Do you mean dozens? Hundreds?
I would be astounded to no end if one could make any progress talking to a Japanese about WWII history... unless it was the European theater. They're very agreeable on that front LOL

For real though, UNESCO, historical documents, world history as taught in every other country, etc... bring out the big guns. They're just like, "Huh? What? Come on; I think we'd know how many people we killed. Yes, a couple of rogue soldiers may have accidentally shot a handful of people. It wasn't that bad. If it was, they'd obviously admit it, and they didn't. Some did, but they're crazy and they don't count. So case closed."

And then, there are the others that want to focus away from war atrocities by putting all the attention on the exact number. Like, "Was it 300K or was it 290K or was it 280K or was it 150K? We don't know and we need to figure out the exact number before anything else. Because if we killed 300K people, that's real bad and indeed requires a big heart-felt apology. That would make us horrible, inhumane monsters! But if it was like 200K, then, I'm thinking it's not that bad and the biggest crime was probably exaggerating the number. So. Let's all focus on the exact number and we'll move on the what was done to them, if anything, after we settle on that. And we're not sorry obviously because we haven't figured out what EXACTLY was done. 'Slaughter and rape of hundreds of thousands of civilians' is just too broad a term to be sorry for. We need the exact number."
 
Last edited:
interestingly Trump Cabinet will be the first in decades without a Hispanic member
Donald Trump's Cabinet is poised to become the first since 1988 without any Hispanic officials — a huge disappointment for members of the nation's second-largest ethnic group —
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
he'll tap former Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue for agriculture secretary.

Two Hispanic Texans were under consideration for the post: former U.S. Rep. Henry Bonilla, a San Antonio Republican, and Elsa Murano, a former Texas A&M president and former undersecretary for food safety.

"We're extremely worried. This is anti-democratic," Hector Sanchez, chairman of the National Hispanic Leadership Agenda, an umbrella group of 40 advocacy organizations, asserting that Trump is undoing decades of progress toward more inclusion.

Ronald Reagan named the first Latino to the Cabinet in 1988 when he picked Texas Democrat
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for education secretary. Cavazos, a former Texas Tech president, stayed on under George Bush. Every president since, from both parties, has had at least one Hispanic in the Cabinet at all times.

"Trump has not only been the most anti-Latino, anti-immigrant president in the history of the nation. By not including Latinos in the Cabinet he is just showing how he is planning to govern," Sanchez said, noting that Latinos now account for 17 percent of the U.S. population.

As Trump filled out his Cabinet, the options narrowed. For agriculture secretary, Hispanic advocates had lately pinned their hopes on Abel Maldonado, a Mexican-American who served as California lieutenant governor and co-owns Runway Vineyards.

Trump
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Apart from Bonilla and Murano, he interviewed Susan Combs, the former Texas comptroller last month at his Mar-a-Lago resort, and aides met with the current agriculture commissioner, Sid Miller.

Trump drew about 18 percent of the vote among Latinos, a historic low for a Republican. Hispanic advocates call that unsurprising, given that Trump labeled Mexican immigrants rapists and murderers, questioned the integrity of a Mexican-American judge, and called for mass deportations and a full-length border wall.

He's also surrounded himself with immigration hardliners such as Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, his pick for attorney general.

Asked Wednesday about the dearth of Hispanics in the Cabinet, Trump spokesman Sean Spicer called it more important to pick people who can do the jobs well.

"He has continued to seek out the best and the brightest to fill out his Cabinet," Spicer said. "We have 5,000 positions and I think you're going to see a very strong presence of the Hispanic community" among senior administration appointments and White House staff.

"I don't have any concern about diversity," he said.

Trump's pick for housing secretary, retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson, is black. South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, his pick for United Nations ambassador, would be the first Indian-American Cabinet member. Transportation pick Elaine Chao is Taiwanese-American.

For Arturo Vargas, executive director of the nonpartisan National Association of Latino Elected Officials, disappointed is too soft a term for being shut out of such a powerful policymaking body. But he's not entirely surprised, he said, given the lack of engagement between Trump and Hispanic groups, until a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

"What this does is it makes our job as advocates for the Hispanic community infinitely harder," Vargas said.

The group — whose current president is Pauline Medrano, the Dallas County treasurer — urged Trump to pick Maldonado.

"The most obvious thing it means to me is that he doesn't know Latinos. He himself and his team don't know who the Latino leaders are," Vargas said.

Alfonso Aguilar, president of Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, criticized Trump's comments about Mexican immigrants but shrugged off the personnel snub.

"If he appointed a Hispanic I would have celebrated it, but if people are competent and they do a good job, I support that," he said, adding that the presence of Hispanics in the Obama Cabinet didn't keep down health care costs or improve job prospects for anyone. "Hispanics are going to look at this administration for the policies it puts into place."

Aguilar recommended Maldonado to Trump aides but called Perdue "a great candidate."

"I'm a Hispanic who doesn't believe in identity politics or quotas," he said. "It's not the end of the world. ... To think that we have a seat at the table just because [Obama Housing Secretary] Julian Castro is in the Cabinet, or [former Obama Labor Secretary] Hilda Solis, is ridiculous."
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
It's just one of those things they don't bother to talk about like the nuclear bunkers that are hidden across The Area around DC or the E4B. Continuation of Government
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
what's
?

my guess would be
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

but I prefer to ask than guess :)
That is E4B
It's a Boeing 747 modified to be a doomsday plane. In the Event of Nuclear war It was to pick up a President or Sec Def either a successor by death of the standing one or a surviving one, and take over the US Forces.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top