US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Portland-launch.jpg

US Navy said:
PASCAGOULA, Miss. (NNS) -- The future USS Portland (LPD 27) was successfully launched at the Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) shipyard Feb. 13.

The ship was transferred from the land level facility to the drydock, which was then flooded allowing her to float off the blocks.

"Every milestone in the construction of a ship is significant, but seeing the ship float out of drydock is visually one of my favorites," said Capt. Darren Plath, LPD 17 Class Program Manager, Program Executive Office (PEO), Ships. "I'm looking forward to sea trials, delivery and other exciting milestones."

The ships are designed to support embarking, transporting, and landing elements of over 800 Marines with both a flight deck which accommodates CH-53 helicopters and MV-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft, and a well deck that can launch and recover landing craft and amphibious vehicles.

LPD 17 class ships are versatile players in maritime security with the ability to support a variety of amphibious assault, special operations or expeditionary warfare missions, operating independently or as part of Amphibious Readiness Groups (ARGs), Expeditionary Strike Groups (ESGs), or Joint Task Forces (JTFs). In addition to performing their primary mission, San Antonio class ships have supported anti-piracy operations, provided humanitarian assistance, and foreign disaster relief operations around the world.

Portland will be the 11th San Antonio class ship delivered by HII which is also currently in the final stages of production on the future John P Murtha (LPD 26).

As one of the Defense Department's largest acquisition organizations, PEO Ships is responsible for executing the development and procurement of all destroyers, amphibious ships, special mission and support ships, and special warfare craft.

The 12th San Antonio class, LPD-28, has been funded and will soon start building. Huntington Ingalls has shown a model of it that indicates it will be a bridge to the new LX(R) design.

LPD28.jpg

The LX(R) design, which will follow and will be based ont he same hull, is meant to replace the LSD vessels currently in US service. They will be a smaller displacement, but with the same type of well deck. 12 of those are planned. Like so:

LXR.jpg
 
Last edited:

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
San Antonio are AA ships with stealths design, rare but more expensive and i think not necessary for a AA ship however the 12th which don' t have especailly these pricey integrated masts is less expensive, good idea from USN better have more ships which remains very decent, same size, same capacities.

Host normaly 700 Marines but surely possible up to 1000 in surge for short periods, very big ships.

For this year the 10th San Antonio, Murtha be commissioned homeported to San Diego. The 11th Portland for 2018 and IIRC the 12th for 2021.

Have problem in the beginning but now this Class worck.

 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


DARPA-to-launch-autonomous-submarine-hunter-vessel.jpg

Naval Today said:
The ever-quieter diesel-electric submarines posing a threat to surface ships might be a thing of the past.

The U.S. Navy, and NATO, who fears the evolving Russian subs, are probably looking up to DARPA’s new anti-submarine warfare “drone ship” which is now being prepared for the sea trials.

U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is developing an unmanned vessel optimized to robustly track quiet diesel electric submarines under the Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel (ACTUV) program.

Officials said the 40-meter unmanned vessel would be launched this spring.

The aim of the project is to make a vessel at a fraction of the price of regular anti-submarine surface combatants. The fact that it would never have a man onboard will allow the vessel to easily match and exceed the speeds of submarines as the vessel would have reduced constraints on conventional naval architecture elements such as layout, accessibility, crew support systems, and reserve buoyancy.

According to DARPA, an advance unmanned maritime system autonomy will enable independent deployment of systems capable of missions spanning thousands of kilometers of range and months of endurance under a sparse remote supervisory control model.

This means the ships would leaving and returning to harbors autonomously while all the time complying with maritime laws and conventions for safe navigation. The vessels will also be equipped with an autonomous system management for operational reliability, and autonomous interactions with an intelligent adversary, the research agency said.

Should everything go according to plans, the vessel could be expected to enter service sometime in 2017.

The concept video below illustrates the ACTUV program and how it is supposed to work.

DARPA video of DARPA’s Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel (ACTUV Concept:

 
what do you guys think?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related:
6,300 Navy job cuts won't hurt fleet manning: CNO
More than 6,300 sailor job cuts set for 2017 won’t harm the manpower additions made in recent years to ships, squadrons and submarines, the Navy’s top officer has said.

Disbanding an air wing and speeding up sailors’ training pipeline accounts for most of the proposed cuts, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. John Richardson, told reporters Friday.

“Really the adjustments — and it’s just a small adjustment I think — come from standing down the tenth air wing,” Richardson said, referring to the Carrier Wing 14, based in Lemoore, California, which is on the chopping block.

“And then learning technology, updating how we educate people, is going to be more efficient and we’ll recover some student billets. Those folks will spend less time in school and get out their units faster. From an impact standpoint, really no impact. Just kind of happening by the virtue of some of the other things we are doing.”

In addition, the Navy plans to boost other ship crews by steeply downsizing cruiser crews, dispatching the sailors to other billets while these warships head into what's likely to be a years-long limbo.

The Navy has been hacking away at manning gaps at sea since they spiked above 17,000 about four years ago. Since then, the Navy has been recruiting more sailors and offering incentives for sea duty, which has driven the number to below 3,000.

The progress won’t be rolled back by the cuts planned for 2017.

“With respect to the progress on manning, none of that will be affected,” Richardson said. “Our ships are manned at the highest levels, about 98 percent is where we are right now. … But more important we are getting the right skill sets and experience on board, so our fit numbers are in the 90s as well.”

Richardson’s comments echoed those of the Navy’s uniformed budget chief, who said the service was committed to keeping up the manning levels at sea.

“At the deckplate level, we have a strong commitment to sustaining the same good manning we have now,” said Rear Adm. William Lescher, deputy assistant secretary of the Navy for budget, said at a Feb. 9 budget briefing.

The Navy is planning on using simulation and gaming technology, among other things, to speed the process of getting sailors to the fleet and freeing up some of the billets dedicated to sailors both in the training pipeline and awaiting training, Lescher said.

“It's not the old computer-based training, it's not clicking through a PowerPoint, its new content,” he said. “It’s a way to accelerate getting our sailors to the chief, to getting them to the fleet and to the chief properly trained. And through that … pilot program … we'll continue to incrementally learn, [and] reduce the end strength in this individuals account.”

The Navy is also planning to save billets by sidelining half of its cruisers. The plan would park 11 of the fleet's 22 cruisers in lay-up pierside. Then, as the Navy decommissioned one of the 11 in the active fleet, it would return a newly modernized cruiser to the fleet to hold the cruiser fleet at 11 ships.

Last year, Navy officials expected laying up the cruisers would save about 2,700 billets, which the Navy was not planning to fund in 2017.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


MHAFB-F35A-01.jpg

US Air Force said:
A much anticipated and important test mission for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Program is underway with the "deployment" of six operational test and evaluation F-35s and more than 85 Airmen from the 31st Test and Evaluation Squadron, who arrived Feb. 8-9.

This is the first simulated deployment test of the F-35A Lightning II, specifically to execute three key initial operational capability mission sets: suppression of enemy air defenses, close air support and air interdiction.

The 31st TES will execute each of these in a limited scope from a "deployed" location for this test. The deployed location is Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho. The 31st TES at Edwards AFB falls under the 53rd Wing at Eglin AFB, Florida, which is leading the test design, management and execution of the F-35A deployment test.

The achievements of an F-35A squadron testing ability to deploy, employ and sustain operations will set the benchmark capability for the Air Force to declare F-35A initial operational capability scheduled for this fall, according to the 53rd Wing.

During the test at Mountain Home AFB, the aircraft will be engaged in simulated combat scenarios to exercise representative mission processes such as tasking, execution, debrief and intelligence reporting. The test team will be working to capture a broad spectrum of capabilities and limitations of the F-35 system to include both operations and maintenance. The team will focus on areas such as mission planning, scheduling, weapons building/loading, sortie generation, life support, mission employment, debrief and aircraft turn.

Nellis AFB in Nevada will serve as a simulated remote air operations center for the deployed environment. Mountain Home AFB is providing a secure location with ranges to employ fourth-generation aircraft as well. The F-35As will integrate with F-15E Strike Eagles from the 366th Fighter Wing at Mountain Home AFB and A-10 Thunderbolt IIs from the 124th Fighter Wing at Gowen Field, Idaho.

The entire test event is expected to last about a month.

MHAFB-F35A-02.jpg

MHAFB-F35A-03.jpg

MHAFB-F35A-04.jpg

In that last picture, in September of 2014, year my wife and I took three of our grandsons to Mountain Home AFB for the Gunfighter Skies Air Show and the two F-35As that were there visiting that day were underneath the aircraft awning to the right there.

MHAFB-F35A-05.jpg

Here's the link to my thread here on SD about it:

https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/gunfighter-skies-2014-airshow.t7027/
 

Brumby

Major
WEST: U.S. Navy Anti-Ship Tomahawk Set for Surface Ships, Subs Starting in 2021
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

SAN DIEGO – Any U.S. Navy ship or submarine capable of firing a Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM) could be armed with an 1000-nautical mile anti-ship cruise missile in less than a decade, service officials told USNI News on Wednesday during the West 2016 conference.

Included in the Fiscal Year 2017 budget request to Congress is a $434 million ask over the next five years to modify 245 Raytheon TLAMS with a maritime attack capability, Vice Adm. Joseph Mulloy, deputy chief of naval operations for integration of capabilities and resources, told USNI News in a Wednesday interview.

“It won’t be all the Tomahawks but a good number of them coming off the line will have it,” he sadi.
“It’s going for surface first and the submarines will encapsulate it.”

The budget moves follows a Naval Air Systems command (NAVAIR) proved a Block IV TLAM – a long range land attack weapon —
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

The Navy had briefly fielded an anti-ship Tomahawk in the 1990s but the lower fidelity of contemporary sensors made the missile risky to use at long ranges for fear of hitting an unintended target.

Following the test, Deputy Secretary of Defense Bob Work
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

According to the plan laid out in the Navy budget (and blessed by big Pentagon) the maritime attack modified Tomahawk will enter the surface force in 2021 for live testing and then trickle out to every platform that can fire the missile – currently the Ticonderoga guided missile cruisers, Arleigh Burke guided missile destroyers the Navy’s attack submarine fleet (SSNs) and the four Ohio-class guided missile nuclear guided missile submarines (SSGNs).

The modification will be part of the Navy’s recertification and life extension of older Tomahawks, which – with new FY 2017 funding for new TLAMS – will be ultimately an inventory of 4,000 missiles.

When the service was programming the FY 2017 budget – which dipped three-and-a-half percent below 2016 projections – it told the Office of the Secretary of Defense it would like to have the capability but didn’t have the funds. OSD agreed and added the line item to the service’s budget, Mulloy said.

The move not only fits into the surface Navy’s
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that seeks to improve the offensive power of the service’s surface assets as quickly as finances allow but also adds a new weapon for submarines to take on surface threats.

Both the surface navy and the submarine force have had limited missile space to take on a myriad of threats and the Navy – until recently – had invested little into new ship-launched anti-surface missile efforts . But with the increasing speed of development of both China and Russia’s anti-surface weapons in the last several years, the ability to pierce the so-called anti-access aerial denial (A2/AD) bubbles designed to keep U.S. forces at arms length has become an increasing concern to the service.

“[Along with] our surface brothers and sisters, we got to get the long-range missile so we’re not held out by that A2/AD bubble and we have the stick to hit inside,” said Vice Adm. Joseph Tofalo, commander, Naval Submarine Forces (COMSUBFOR), said on Wednesday.
“We need to diversify the kinds of targets our missiles can hit to include the introduction of an anti-ship version of the Tomahawk missile.”

The Navy’s submarines previously fielded a sub-launched version of Boeing’s Harpoon anti-ship missile (UGM-84A) but retired the line in 1997. The introduction of the anti-ship TLAM would be the first anti-surface weapon in the sub force since the Harpoons left the fleet.

News of the maritime TLAM follows Secretary of Defense Ash Carter’s announcement of the development of an anti-surface mode of the super sonic
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Combined with the Tomahawk investment, the pair will be the first new anti-surface system the service has fielded in decades.

“There’s a lot of things that we can do to make smart investments now to continue to change the calculus of our potential adversaries so as we execute the strategy they’ll wake up and say, ‘We didn’t see that one coming’,” said Vice Adm. Thomas Rowden, commander U.S. Surface Forces Pacific (SURFPAC) said on Wednesday.
 

Brumby

Major
Will the Navy test its futuristic rail gun at sea this year?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It looks like the jury is still out on this.

Two years ago, the Navy announced that it would test its futuristic rail gun in 2016 aboard a Joint High Speed Vessel, a new transport ship for which top admirals envision a variety of missions. The test would mark the first time the electromagnetic weapon — capable of firing rounds up to Mach 7 — would be fired at sea, "symbolizing a significant advance in naval combat," Navy officials said.

With 2016 here, however, senior Navy officials appear to be moving off that testing plan. Adm. Pete Fanta, the Navy's director of surface warfare, has proposed forgoing the testing and instead putting it directly on the future USS Lyndon B. Johnson, the third and final ship in the futuristic Zumwalt class of destroyers. It's under construction at Bath Iron Works in Maine now, but is not expected to be completed until 2018.

The Associated Press published a story on the project this week, creating some buzz around the proposal. But the discussion has been ongoing for more than a month. Matt Leonard, a spokesman for Navy Sea Systems Command, told The Washington Post on Wednesday that the service is "studying the pros/cons of forgoing a 2016 at-sea demonstration" of the rail gun.

The shift, Leonard said, is under consideration with an eye toward accelerating testing of the rail gun and the "hypervelocity projectile" it fires, which also might be fired from conventional five-inch and 155mm naval guns.

Fanta told the independent Defense News newspaper late in December that he favored pushing back at-sea demonstrations rather than testing this year on an Expeditionary Fast Transport ship, the Navy's new name for the Joint High Speed Vessel class. But the Navy won't yet say whether that idea has won out.

"What I'm finding is if I go ahead with the demo it will slow my development," Fanta told Defense News. "I would rather get an operational unit out there faster than do a demonstration that just does a demonstration."

The Johnson has long been considered a front runner to carry that operational unit. More than a year ago, the commander of Naval Sea Systems Command, Vice Adm. William Hilarides, told USNI News that engineering studies were underway to make sure the ship had enough power, space and cooling to carry a rail gun. The first two ships in the class, the USS Zumwalt and the USS Michael Monsoor, were considered less likely homes for it because of the testing schedule for all three ships, which combined will cost at least $12.3 billion.

The Zumwalt class itself is just beginning to find its footing after a long period of research and building. The first ship, named after former Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Elmo Zumwalt, went to sea for the first time in December for initial sea trials. It was considered a first step toward showing how the 610-foot-long, 15,480-ton destroyer can perform afloat despite having an unconventional pyramid-shaped hull that slopes out at the bottom with a stealthy "tumblehome" design. That should make it harder to find on radar, but also has long raised questions about how stable it will be when facing tough seas.

The Navy has said little about what it learned during those sea trials, which occurred from Dec. 7 to Dec. 13. Navy Capt. Thurraya Kent, a service spokeswoman, said in an email that personnel aboard tested several systems, carrying out operations involving small boats, anchors, propulsion and other systems.

"Primary risk reduction objectives were successfully met and, as with any trials, the Navy learned a great deal about ship performance during the more than 100 hours of extensive testing," Kent said. The ship "will have additional at sea periods in the local operating area prior to delivery but dates are not releasable for force protection reasons."
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
WEST: U.S. Navy Anti-Ship Tomahawk Set for Surface Ships, Subs Starting in 2021
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
So, the TLAM aboard ships in 2021.

In the meant time, the LRASM is (I believe) still scheduled for deployment to B-1Bs in 2018 and then F/A18s in 2019. The LRASM is also designed to fit into MK-41 VLS and the newer MK-57 VLS too for shipboard and then later submarine use...but I am not sure what dates they are projecting them to be available aboard ship. Anyone know that schedule?

Almost sounds like it will be in the same time frame as the TLAM.

Finally then, it is looking like in the early 2020s the US Navy will get back to where it should never have strayed from...having a potent anti-surface missile capability aboard many of its combat ships which look to include TLAM, LRASM, and SM-6 capabilities.
 
Top