US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
The old F-15s are rotting and there are no more F-22s. The F-35 just does not cut it either.
And Americans used to laugh about Russia having programs like the Su-35.
Old F-15s have so many airframe aging issues and F-22/F-35 are hangar queen. Having fighters that can fly is way more important than having fighters that are G limited for structural reasons, grounded or unavailable.
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The narrative has shifted to: the US doesn't really need hypersonic missiles. We can use our superior C4ISR capabilities to track and intercept them.
Relying on surveillance, the kill chain need to be short and outside the range of any hacker. AI will help but you need insane coverage from interception missiles platform too, not just from satellites.

It's hard to test defence systems without the real threat, they don't have any hypersonic missiles to test against it. Look like vaporware but it's still a good tinfoil to bring money home for the defence industry.
 

pmc

Major
Registered Member
Su-35 ended up being pretty weak for its potential though...
how do you know? just because it can destroy a air defense system does not mean it has to do it right away.
and there is alot of experimentation going with alot of systems both ground and air.
It was presented from day 1 as acting combined with attack choppers.

1708461479846.png
 
Top