UK Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Phead128

Major
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs

Phead128

Major
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
^ There's a GCAP thread? In any case, perhaps there should be.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Is this the same country that just pulled an order for a dozen F-35As out of its ass? Talk about getting your priorities in order...
It's funny we didn't even bother to have an FCAS thread, and it's already basically dead in the water. Let's hold off on a GCAP thread unless there is tangible progress. France-Germany-Spain are NATO allies and close culturally and same time zone. UK-Italy-Japan are even more disparate linguistically, culturally, and working style wise as you can get. Just the time zone difference would be a massive challenge.
 

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator
It's funny we didn't even bother to have an FCAS thread, and it's already basically dead. Let's hold off on a GCAP thread unless there is tangible progress. France-Germany-Spain are NATO allies and close culturally and same time zone. UK, Italy, and Japan are even more disparate linguistically, culturally, and working style wise as you can get. Just the time zone difference would be a massive challenge.
There is always the Fan Art thread.
 

Lethe

Captain
Browsing through Norman Friedman's British Submarines in the Cold War era, the gulf between the realities and ambitions of yesteryear and those of today is always striking:

In May 1977 the Fleet Requirements Committee wanted twenty-four SSN and nine SSK (conventional submarines). It envisioned five SSN on surveillance duty north of the GIUK Gap and another five attacking Soviet submarines passing through the passive (SOSUS) surveillance area around the Gap. Another three would be employed to mark (and engage) Soviet surface ships moving south into the Atlantic to attack shipping. Four more would support the British SSBN force. Finally, seven would employed in direct support of British surface groups. Of the diesel submarines, five would be employed in the barrier in the Gap and another four would be employed supporting SSBNs and in the shallow seas.

By 1983 the direct support mission was gone. The requirement was now twenty-seven active SSN and thirteen active SSK, backed by another seven SSN and four SSK in refit. Many more SSN were now to be forward-deployed: four in the Barents Sea and eleven in the North Norwegian Sea, with another five in the South Norwegian Sea and the GIUK Gap. One was assigned to the South-west/North-west Approaches and four to defence of shipping. Of the SSKs, two would be in the North Norwegian Sea, eight in the South Norwegian Sea and the Gap, two in the South-west/North-west Approaches and one would be assigned to defence of shipping. Given actual numbers available, this was most unlikely to happen.

The declared NATO requirement for 1985-90 listed four SSN as a flank barrier, another eight conducting area ASW, two in the North-west Approaches and two for augmentation, plus four refitting. The SSK requirement was six for area ASW, five in the GIUK Gap, one in the North-west Approaches, two for augmentation and three refitting. That made for a total of twenty SSN and seventeen SSK, the former being attainable but the latter entirely unrealistic. In 1985 the Royal Navy had thirteen SSNs in service; plans called for that to increase to eighteen in 1991, after which it would decline without service extension. At this time the planned 1985 SSK force was fifteen submarines, including the remaining rebuilt Oberons. Without some special measures, the SSK force would begin to decline in 1988. (pp. 163-4)

Today the Royal Navy has no SSKs and only six SSNs in service, and there are at least occasions where
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
are at sea.

It's funny we didn't even bother to have an FCAS thread, and it's already basically dead in the water. Let's hold off on a GCAP thread unless there is tangible progress. France-Germany-Spain are NATO allies and close culturally and same time zone. UK-Italy-Japan are even more disparate linguistically, culturally, and working style wise as you can get. Just the time zone difference would be a massive challenge.

GCAP seems to have a lot more momentum behind it than FCAS, I doubt that it's going to fizzle out. Japan's involvement is novel to be sure, but the UK and Italy have a long history of collaboration, not only with previous European combat aircraft projects such as Typhoon and Tornado, but also helicopters (AgustaWestland), the common heritage of Type 45/Horizon and EMPAR/SAMPSON, etc. Given the multinational nature of the project and its significance for each of the national partners, I think a dedicated thread could be justified rather than having piecemeal updates scattered across various threads.
 
Last edited:

jospence

New Member
Registered Member
I would also be very surprised if GCAP fizzles out, seems like some budgetary snags at the moment which are pretty common for projects this expensive. With the erratic nature of the U.S. and apparent weakening of Europe-US military alliances, I would be shocked if it ended up falling through, it's an extremely important project for Italian, Japanese, and British aerospace companies.

Instead of a GCAP specific thread, it might be better to create a thread for Non US and Chinese Next Generation Aircraft. That way it can include discussion for GCAP, FCAS, and whatever Russia ends up doing.
 

Broccoli

Senior Member
Why is Royal Navy so allergic towards corvettes? I haven't found any proper explanation. Adding 57mm gun, 4xNSM, CAMM "mushroom farm"into slightly enlarged River-class OPV would make it a nice little corvette.
 

Gloire_bb

Colonel
Registered Member
Why is Royal Navy so allergic towards corvettes? I haven't found any proper explanation. Adding 57mm gun, 4xNSM, CAMM "mushroom farm"into slightly enlarged River-class OPV would make it a nice little corvette.
It would make it (at least) twice as expensive to procure and operate, adding absolutely nothing to its primary presence role.
At that point, it will cost close to type 31 GP(colonial really) frigate - which does more or less the thing up-armed River will be able to, just much better.
 

Lethe

Captain
Why is Royal Navy so allergic towards corvettes? I haven't found any proper explanation. Adding 57mm gun, 4xNSM, CAMM "mushroom farm"into slightly enlarged River-class OPV would make it a nice little corvette.

For European navies especially, personnel numbers and costs are often the single greatest limiting factor. Small combatants aren't great from that perspective, at least those with higher-end sensors and capabilities that each require more specialised crew to operate and maintain. Better to stick those scarce skillsets on a more flexible frigate.
 
Top