Maybe the goal of CN is to assist the "controlled decline" and maybe not to corner "US" so much, hence the alleged resume of RE export?A freeze instead of a deal, with exemptions on some restrictions?
Maybe the goal of CN is to assist the "controlled decline" and maybe not to corner "US" so much, hence the alleged resume of RE export?A freeze instead of a deal, with exemptions on some restrictions?
What do you think Trump was trying to do with that Ukrainian mineral deal, that was negotiated on before the current trade war?Essentially giving US a 6 month reprieve for what exactly, the restrictions US added as a retaliation to the rare earth controls? That's pretty much saying that US retaliated and China caved because of the retaliation.
Really disappointed if this is the agreement. China chickened out and Trump overpowered them with controls on jet engines for Comac and student visas.
China gave up its most powerful leverage for nothing. Now US and the entire world knows China has leverage on rare earth and they will start investing heavily to mitigate that. So the leverage has an expiration date now.
What does fighting to the bitter end look like for you? Do you think China going through this unscathed? Factories and workers were being hurt on both sides. If Trump wanted to be a prick and go on longer, China would've done the same. But the leadership is practical and if Trump due to getting himself into multiple crisis wanted instead to bring everything back to square one and shelve this, whose the CPC to say no?If this is indeed the agreement, then this is an unmitigated disgrace. So much for fighting until the bitter end.
I assume that if Trump's post was really BS that some Chinese official would have set the record straight by now.
In case anyone is interested. Here is the non-paywall version of the article you asked me to read.
If this is indeed the agreement, then this is an unmitigated disgrace. So much for fighting until the bitter end.
I assume that if Trump's post was really BS that some Chinese official would have set the record straight by now.
If this is indeed the agreement, then this is an unmitigated disgrace. So much for fighting until the bitter end.
I assume that if Trump's post was really BS that some Chinese official would have set the record straight by now.
In case anyone is interested. Here is the non-paywall version of the article you asked me to read.
Your article mostly focuses on samarium. Despite its uses in wider military application, it is still a dual use mineral with civilian applications in car, turbines and headphones. It doesn’t refute my main argument that rare earth approved for final civilian use could be secretly diverted because china has limited inspection power. Since samarium is on the US list for stockpiling, it makes my suggested scenario much more likely.
Read this article for a breakdown of the uses of seven restricted rare earth minerals.
Actually, all seven rare earth minerals restricted by china in April have both civilian and military uses. For example, Terbium can be used for smartphone, but also adds temperature resilience to magnets used in missiles. Yttrium is used in medical applications to treat cancer, but it can also be used in high temperature superconductors. Scandium is used in fighter plane components as well as oil refining. Gadolinium is used in MRI contrast as well as enhancing performance of alloys improving heat resistance which could be relevant in military jet engine manufacturing. You can read about the rest in article linked above. I think US firms applying for permits would emphasize their civilian usage needs.
Also, your NYT article was published before the announced “deal” which makes it out of date with the current information. In light of the “deal”, China could grant permits for samarium in the coming days probably with Trump administration's continuing public pressure. We will soon find out.
Sounds like the annual MFN renewal from 1989 to 2001 by the US on China.People seem struggle to understand the difference between export control and ban, China has always been granting licenses and never said it wont, the licensing system exist to enforce compliance with end user sanctions and prevent stockpiling, nobody said China has removed that system, the fact that there is a license andcthe license expires in 6 month means the reciever can only be the receiver of the license, not anyone, and in quantities the license grants, not arbitary.
Trump manufactured cards and exchanged them for China expediating processing of applications that China never said they wont approve but also no applications China wouldnt have approved, at end of the day China continues to throttle the entire US economy while US performed zero net action.
Trump basically tried to frame China allowing the US civilian economy to live for 6 month as a win while implicitly accepted the new normal where US now need a license from China to live and that license need to be renewed every 6 month based on good behavior.
What does fighting to the bitter end look like for you? Do you think China going through this unscathed? Factories and workers were being hurt on both sides. If Trump wanted to be a prick and go on longer, China would've done the same. But the leadership is practical and if Trump due to getting himself into multiple crisis wanted instead to bring everything back to square one and shelve this, whose the CPC to say no?
You wanted them to tell Trump hell no and keep kicking? That's not how trade works buddy.