Trump 2.0 official thread

[siegecrossbow]

Looks like the use of Vedic weapons was highly effective.

Came to the belated realization that this is a rare case of a sitting head of state participating in literal shit posting.

 

[RoastGooseHKer]

MAGA is doing everything they don't want done to the white man's masculinity to Asian men. I enjoy how they think they're losing their masculinity because they're hypocrites and losers that deserve no sympathy. They aren't going to see you as a brother.

Very true indeed. You see western majour media outlets from left to right discrediting Asian and other men in favour of white savour men. They have been doing it since the days of Fu Manchu. More recently, Two Broke Girls and Long Duck Dong. My city HK has long been the prime victim of this ploy. For Anglo countries, it has arguably been an unspoken sinister strategy to discredit non-white men in favour of WASP men so women both domestically and outside of the country - including from even adversarial nations - become so brainwashed to become Anglo men’s breading opportunities. In other words, you morally and ideologically castrate foreign men, whilst turning their women into your men’s breeding resources. Most Muslim countries have the same rule. If you want to marry a Muslim girl (such as in the cases of Chinese men who want to marry Pakistani women), the bride side of the family usually expect the men to convert first. This has long been an issue with the Hui and Uighur intermarriages with Han men. It is an extremely clever strategy to expand your race/nation’s breeding opportunities, whilst limiting those of your adversaries and foreign ones. I don’t blame the Anglos and MAGA (or muslims). They do what they have to do to maximise their living space and resources. International politics have always been characterised by the rules of the jungles.

This is a gender aspect of great power politics that the CPC (and the former USSR) appears to have either overlooked for a long time or is simply incapable to fighting back against. CPC’s internationalist and gender/national equity aspect of its founding ideology also prevents it from firmly standing up for the interests of majourity Chinese men. And of course, MAGA men won’t see Chinese as friends. Hell no! There’s a zero sum struggle between the two groups over resources, including reproductive ones. But if Chinese men can protect and defend their country the way MAGA does (for example, China can have its own versions Proud Boys) at least Chinese feminists would have less room to survive and spread their ideologies within the physical and cyberspace under PRC’s dominion. Regarding how to fight for their rights, living space, and resources, Chinese men (and patriotic women) have a lot to learn from MAGA men and conservative white women. In other words, MAGA is a handbook for every nation to make sure their countrymen do not become traitors and foreign worshippers, which in turn would become a fifth column welcoming the Trojan Horse, leading to national collapse and occupation.

 

[mshrief303]

Very true indeed. You see western majour media outlets from left to right discrediting Asian and other men in favour of white savour men. They have been doing it since the days of Fu Manchu. More recently, Two Broke Girls and Long Duck Dong. My city HK has long been the prime victim of this ploy. For Anglo countries, it has arguably been an unspoken sinister strategy to discredit non-white men in favour of WASP men so women both domestically and outside of the country - including from even adversarial nations - become so brainwashed to become Anglo men’s breading opportunities. In other words, you morally and ideologically castrate foreign men, whilst turning their women into your men’s breeding resources. Most Muslim countries have the same rule. If you want to marry a Muslim girl (such as in the cases of Chinese men who want to marry Pakistani women), the bride side of the family usually expect the men to convert first. This has long been an issue with the Hui and Uighur intermarriages with Han men. It is an extremely clever strategy to expand your race/nation’s breeding opportunities, whilst limiting those of your adversaries and foreign ones. I don’t blame the Anglos and MAGA (or muslims). They do what they have to do to maximise their living space and resources. International politics have always been characterised by the rules of the jungles.

This is a gender aspect of great power politics that the CPC (and the former USSR) appears to have either overlooked for a long time or is simply incapable to fighting back against. CPC’s internationalist and gender/national equity aspect of its founding ideology also prevents it from firmly standing up for the interests of majourity Chinese men. And of course, MAGA men won’t see Chinese as friends. Hell no! There’s a zero sum struggle between the two groups over resources, including reproductive ones. But if Chinese men can protect and defend their country the way MAGA does (for example, China can have its own versions Proud Boys) at least Chinese feminists would have less room to survive and spread their ideologies within the physical and cyberspace under PRC’s dominion. Regarding how to fight for their rights, living space, and resources, Chinese men (and patriotic women) have a lot to learn from MAGA men and conservative white women. In other words, MAGA is a handbook for every nation to make sure their countrymen do not become traitors and foreign worshippers, which in turn would become a fifth column welcoming the Trojan Horse, leading to national collapse and occupation.

Muslims who refuses marriage because their religion, their religion don't care about your race or ethnicity.

Comparing that to a system which is made for colonial & genocidal goals, like what westerners do with asia, muslims themselves, south america, africa and even some places in europe --> is ridiculous.

And muslims don't make an information campaign showing every men in other culture as uneducated, bastard, addict and ugly man, while showing women as a dancing, lusting and sexy women waiting for the "hero" to come and take her away.

Different religions that prohibit their followers from marrying form other religions - or some of them - is way different from that colonial system and method that's used by the west.

You can be a christian, muslim, or buddist or anything else by your choise, you've the capability to do so -- if you want. It's the same as someone refusing to marry because they've the criteria that the partner should be an engineer or a doctor. But the western system and method refuse you for your mere existence, and it's something you can't change, even you did everything they do and attacked your own people --> you'll still be inferior but better than the others. For instance, Obama is an athiest that was born in a muslim family, he became the president and waged wars, copes and assassinations against muslims, but still you'll see racists attacking him and calling him "Barack Hussien Obama", even the democrats would do the same if only they don't need his publicity and fame.

So to cut it short, it's not the same.