Trade War with China

Status
Not open for further replies.

antiterror13

Brigadier
China has seen far worse days. It must not bow a bit. If it does bow a bit, it must ensure that in the long run and grand scheme of things, that bow was only there to guarantee even more power and prestige to itself. This trade war that imposes 25% tariff on 350 billion goods of china is going to extract 0.25*350*21/25 = 75 billion dollars from Chinese state every year ( as claimed by trump office). 75 billion dollars to maintain it's sovereignty intact and not get bullied/blackmailed? That's insignificant. I'll just assume that it was another earthquake/typhoon every year.

do you really understand how the tariff works? ... just wondering

There will be no single dollar extracted from Chinese exporters .. all $75B will be paid by Americans consumers or American corporate profits
 

Max Demian

Junior Member
Registered Member
do you really understand how the tariff works? ... just wondering

There will be no single dollar extracted from Chinese exporters .. all $75B will be paid by Americans consumers or American corporate profits

Come on ... others have already demonstrated such extreme statements are not true - just like those of Trump aren't. The fact that the Yuan depreciated in reaction tells us that China is paying part of the tariffs.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Come on ... others have already demonstrated such extreme statements are not true - just like those of Trump aren't. The fact that the Yuan depreciated in reaction tells us that China is paying part of the tariffs.
If it's that simple, then why is the US against China depreciating the yuan? After all, they want China to pay for them, not American consumers, right? They should encourage depreciation, right?
 

Quickie

Colonel
Come on ... others have already demonstrated such extreme statements are not true - just like those of Trump aren't. The fact that the Yuan depreciated in reaction tells us that China is paying part of the tariffs.

That's just speculative volatility in reaction to the threat. The Yuan was volatile in the beginning but has basically remained unchanged with the 10% tariffs on 200 billion of goods.
 

Xizor

Captain
Registered Member
Again, China can pay the tariffs by depreciation of the Yuan and subsidies, but we have no way to know how much this is happening.
But i thought, Mnuchin and Lightizer were trying hard to force china for a stable YUAN that may not be depreciated so as to soften the tariff pain?
 

Biscuits

Major
Registered Member
Well, I want to hear your perspectives on the relationship between SOEs (I mean state-subsidies here) and CCP political control. Therefore, would rolling back SOE subsidies, along with subsidies directed toward MIC 2025 programs, while giving the PRC's private sector (including allowing more millionaires and billionaires to move more of their assets abroad) more freedom seriously weaken the CCP's ability to mobilize support and resources, especially in times of crises? My question is over whether more control or less control over the economy would allow the CCP to maintain its legitimacy and support. Also, based on what I have learned, Beijing's current approach to MIC 2025 is more like import-substitution industrialization. Would private enterprises without state subsidies still be able to compete effectively with Apple, Samsung, Microsoft, Intel, etc.?

That’s a weirdly phrased question.

Political power comes from a longstanding concept of a nation state. Competence is the main factor in tempering it. I assume, if a SOE did something stupid, Beijing would just drop it and/or disavow the connections, like what Washington is doing with Boeing now.

Rolling back subsidies would give CPC more money to invest in another sector, so it depends on how that money is used.

But generally it will only affect that person who is in charge of deciding that thing you know? If they’re incompetent, the rest of the administration will fire them or refuse to renew their position.

As for competition, it depends on what it is about. Obviously competing with heavily subsidized companies without subsidies of their own is difficult, but given the different tech base, there’s a lot of variables. It could either go like Huawei vs US 5G companies, where Huawei utterly dominates, like Chinese PC companies vs American ones, where it’s sort of equal, or go like Chinese farming vs US farming, where the latter completely dominates.
 

Max Demian

Junior Member
Registered Member
That's just speculative volatility in reaction to the threat. The Yuan was volatile in the beginning but has basically remained unchanged with the 10% tariffs on 200 billion of goods.

We can discuss the underlying reasons for the depriciation, but the numbers are as follows:

6.31 Yuan to USD on 23rd March 2018 (first China targeted tariffs)
6.77 Yuan to USD on 7th May 2019
 

localizer

Colonel
Registered Member
The amount of depreciation so far was likely market driven for Chinese manufacturing to remain competitive. I suspect the increase in deficit was because it made other nontariffed sectors even more competitive. China is likely not manipulating (though Impossible to prove either way) its currency. To transition to a China sized consumption led economy, we need appreciation (Plaza Accord) and an increasing role of the yuan as a challenger to the dollar as a reserve currency. It’s not easy to do this while trying to keep manufacturing afloat and laborers happy unless you can AI the crap out of labor and screw the rest of the third world labor force.

The CCP wants it all and I will be very amazed if they can pull it off. I can see it happening though.

You gotta know that Dollar being the reserve currency hurts the developing world living standards, but that’s how it is. Everyone is forced to choose to become a factory of the West and eventually make it or end up a nonsense economy.
 
Last edited:

Quickie

Colonel
We can discuss the underlying reasons for the depriciation, but the numbers are as follows:

6.31 Yuan to USD on 23rd March 2018 (first China targeted tariffs)
6.77 Yuan to USD on 7th May 2019

6.31 Yuan is on the high end of its historical value. When Trump was elected, the value of Yuan was 6.80. With the 10% tariffs, the value of Yuan did not shoot past 7.00 as most analysts had predicted. It stabilized at around 6.6x Yuan/USD before this new round of tariff threat.
 
Here's the most recent insight into the matter:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I am of the opinion that Trump's personal whims and caprices are the primary, if not sole, driver of these volatile policy shifts. The prevailing view among Chinese observers used to be of a downplaying of Trump's own capacity/agency in driving US trade policy. This is no longer the case, and anyone who still thinks so should really examine issues more critically. Remember that the US political establishment had been almost universally against tariffs in the outset, and we have only seen Trump's cabinet appointees follow through with them to date since they are merely effusive supplicants (i.e. dogs). Previously there was plenty of outspoken criticism against tariffs from those same appointees, as well as evidence of their seeking a less demanding deal in negotiations only to come up against Trump (Lighthizer and Navarro might be the hawkish exceptions, though Mnuchin and Kudlow are known to be more dovish.) There is no "deep state" either, which some of you seem to be alluding to. The only thing that comes close is the natsec establishment, and so far they've failed to prove much leverage in independently influencing the outcome of negotiations (e.g. DOJ indictment of CFO Meng and Trump's irreverent response).

I agree to disagree then. I was never referencing any "deep state" but rather factions of the US elite particularly big money special interests who have much in common with Trump's personal interests, value system, and even worldview. Again, their foreign (including trade) policy behavior has as much to do with their self-serving domestic agenda as their international agenda, if not primarily so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top