The War in the Ukraine

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Screenshot 2025-10-24 134329.jpg
Is there someone knowledgeable about jet RC planes that can speak about this little turbojet SW800Pro? How come both US techbro turned MIC and Russian MIC are buying it to fit them into weapons? Is there some combination of specs that make this particular make attractive?

From a cursory search on alibaba it seems to be popular in RC hobby and is on the larger end of hobby grade turbojet, but is there anything else to it?

Here's the company website and specs:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

It's the second largest engine the company makes, there's one larger one that has 120kg of thrust compared to this at 80kg.
 
Last edited:

CaribouTruth

Junior Member
Registered Member
View attachment 163135
Is there someone knowledgeable about jet RC planes that can speak about this little turbojet SW800Pro? How come both US techbro turned MIC and Russian MIC are buying it to fit them into weapons? Is there some combination of specs that make this particular make attractive?
Much of it is simply down to tech parity, production ability/volume, lead times and direct to consumer sales.

Chinese turbojets are cheaper than western alternatives, they have similar technological levels (specific fuel consumption, thrust, pumps, digital ecus etc etc) at almost half the cost in some cases. They are sold direct to customer instead of through things like dealerships lol, the companies have ability to churn out engines because they have automated production facilities so bulk orders are even better with Chinese manufacturers. They have basically no lead times.

Writing all this down you just notice that its all the same industrial and manufacturing advantage China has in every other industry applied to turbojets.
 

Mmmeeeto

Junior Member
Registered Member
Last edited:

plawolf

Lieutenant General
New variant of the UMPK kit with a more streamlined design and a booster rocket, giving it a claimed range of 200km


View attachment 162993

It actually makes me wonder just how much extra weight it would need to add a spine to connect the wing kit to the turbofan engine section, a release mechanism to separate the wing kit from the bomb (mini gelatines to cut the steel straps holding the bomb should suffice) and a mini parachute. You can add an IFF beacon as well if you want to be extra safe and future proof).

This way, you basically turn the expendable wing kit into a reusable drone that aims the bomb at the target co-ordinates, separates and flys back to a predetermined friendly controlled area and deploy parachute to be recovered and used again.

The trade offs will be increased unit cost and weight, as well as reduced range if you want to recover the glide kit. But it could add up to a significant amount of savings cumulatively, as well as give you potentially additional use options. For example, you could swap the FAB out for a cluster munitions dispenser and drop cluster bombs along a trench/tree line rather than just hit a single point with a FAB.

This is the sort of thing that will have minimal demand during peace time, but something that becomes a hell of a lot more attractive in a war economy situation where you need to stretch finite resources as far as you can.
 
Top