Shenyang next gen combat aircraft thread

latenlazy

Brigadier
I’ve only done state space stuff for aeroelasticity, and even for just a wing with TE flaps it’s an absolute nightmare, and the design team has to work with the 4 pairs of TE control surfaces, LE slats (or flaps), AMTs and TVC nozzles. I would just jump off of a bridge instead but hey that’s probably why I’m not the one designing a 6th gen fighter
Just remember that they have teams for a reason :p
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
Also the way people traditionally think about it is probably not how the control law was derived either, its probably done with state space control (at least, could be even fancier) with a the entire system and every actuator modelled in state matrices then optimal control deflections of all actuators solved together in real time.
I just had a crazzyyyy thought (purely speculative, no basis on my part to believe this is actually the case).

What if they’re using neural nets to do FCS development? That might imply a very different approach to the kinds of flight testing you’d have to do to develop the FCS, since the data you’d be collecting for a NN based approach would probably require exploring the flight control envelop limits for training purposes, rather than validating and refining the pre-stimulated parameters you’d normally determine in pre-flight modeling.

Again purely *baseless* speculation on my part, but maybe a fun thought to contemplate.
 

Phead128

Captain
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
I just had a crazzyyyy thought (purely speculative, no basis on my part to believe this is actually the case).

What if they’re using neural nets to do FCS development? That might imply a very different approach to the kinds of flight testing you’d have to do to develop the FCS, since the data you’d be collecting for a NN based approach would probably require exploring the flight control envelop limits for training purposes, rather than validating and refining the pre-stimulated parameters you’d normally determine in pre-flight modeling.

Again purely *baseless* speculation on my part, but maybe a fun thought to contemplate.
Airbus plans to use neural network AI to help design flight control systems for the FCAS next gen project. (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)

Given how Chief Designer at Shenyang (Wang Yongqing) has disclosed that his team uses DeepSeek AI to help design next-gen stealth fighters like J-50, I wouldn't be surprised if neural networks is part of the development tools. (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) Wang said: “This technology is already demonstrating considerable operational value,” he said, “providing novel methodologies and pathways for future aerospace R&D.” Wang emphasized that artificial intelligence is not merely a peripheral tool but is being embedded into core workflows.
 

iewgnem

Senior Member
Registered Member
I just had a crazzyyyy thought (purely speculative, no basis on my part to believe this is actually the case).

What if they’re using neural nets to do FCS development? That might imply a very different approach to the kinds of flight testing you’d have to do to develop the FCS, since the data you’d be collecting for a NN based approach would probably require exploring the flight control envelop limits for training purposes, rather than validating and refining the pre-stimulated parameters you’d normally determine in pre-flight modeling.

Again purely *baseless* speculation on my part, but maybe a fun thought to contemplate.
I'm not up to date on the state of the art fixed wing controls, I know there are a large body of research into NN based control and a lot of demos on small drones, but I would expect mission critical manned aircraft to still use deterministic control laws.

State space control isn't really that fancy, it just require a lot of high order modelling, can solve a complex control problem holistically and can achieve optimal control for a given set of observers and actuators. Something like J-50 with complex dynamics can be solved easier and better with this holestic approaches than linear methods, but at end of the day I'd expect the general KISS rule still hold.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
I'm not up to date on the state of the art fixed wing controls, I know there are a large body of research into NN based control and a lot of demos on small drones, but I would expect mission critical manned aircraft to still use deterministic control laws.

State space control isn't really that fancy, it just require a lot of high order modelling, can solve a complex control problem holistically and can achieve optimal control for a given set of observers and actuators. Something like J-50 with complex dynamics can be solved easier and better with this holestic approaches than linear methods, but at end of the day I'd expect the general KISS rule still hold.

You don’t necessarily need to run the whole control laws via a NN. What I had in mind was using a NN approach to map your state space. More of a development cadence hack was what I had in mind. Like I said I don’t have any basis for thinking the J-50 is going with this approach. Was just a fun thought.
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
Not sure if I should link these then, as they are CG images. But at least they're of the Shenyang's plane.

008qc6cxly1i1mrr08obbj32yo1w4npd (1).jpg
More CG images at the link below.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


That Tomcat guy seems to have done a lot of 3D models of a lot of planes. But he seems to have zero presence on the non-Chinese internet.
 
Last edited:
Top