I think I see the problem here.Since you insist.
This is a post hoc fallacy. Whether the F-35 is inferior or not to the F-22 is irrelevant to its detection capability against the SU-57. There is no causal relationship in your reasoning.
This is non sequitur. How is the stealthy capabilities of the MADL related to the 3G/4G/5G and more importantly - so what? It is a fallacy of logic.
This is simply straw man and frankly irrelevant. How does a com link on a plane ended up with a phone? There is a simple reason why principle of logic matters is to prevent silly reasoning.
This take the prize. How on earth does a conversation on jamming cf communication ends up with this picture as a rebuttal? What the heck is this and how is it even relevant?
This is another post hoc fallacy where you are just making things up. It is why we don't take your comments seriously and why we don't waste time responding on most occasions...
There is no "military antenna" or " radar antenna" or "civilian antenna".
There is only a single design and single principle how anyone can generate electromagnetic waves, about the calculation of beam width , side lobes , detection ability and jam resistance.
Any secure, non detectable and non jammable long communication system must use directional antennas, and in the case of a mobile platform automatic (preferably electronics) steering.
It can be either mechanically steered YAGI / parabolic antennas, or electronically steered phased array antennas.
Neither of them is special by any means, lot of guy makes this kind of stuff as a hobby at home.
Actually, anyone who can make a radar can make this kind of com system as well, considering that it is a cheap/ dumbed down radar.
And still, I am very interested about the F-35 radar performance calculation : )