QBZ-191 service rifle family

Boneroyalx

New Member
Registered Member
Venezuelan here. From the footage I have seen, our forces use the qbz-97b, which some having an eotech looking sights.

Does any users here that are PAP/PLA, or have acquaintances, comment on how they felt using the qbz-191/192? As ergonomics, how it feels to shot, the recoil, etc. or at least post Chinese links where it is discussed. Would be even better if they also used ak or western weapons for a subjective comparison.

I just wanna give a rough comparison in my mind on how good buying a qbz-191 compared to just buying an m4a1 or ak-103. Sad that unit price still seems classified.
 

Wrought

Senior Member
Registered Member
Venezuelan here. From the footage I have seen, our forces use the qbz-97b, which some having an eotech looking sights.

Does any users here that are PAP/PLA, or have acquaintances, comment on how they felt using the qbz-191/192? As ergonomics, how it feels to shot, the recoil, etc. or at least post Chinese links where it is discussed. Would be even better if they also used ak or western weapons for a subjective comparison.

I just wanna give a rough comparison in my mind on how good buying a qbz-191 compared to just buying an m4a1 or ak-103. Sad that unit price still seems classified.

@QIUSIYU is ex-PAP, ask him to weigh in.
 

baozi

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Venezuelan here. From the footage I have seen, our forces use the qbz-97b, which some having an eotech looking sights.

Does any users here that are PAP/PLA, or have acquaintances, comment on how they felt using the qbz-191/192? As ergonomics, how it feels to shot, the recoil, etc. or at least post Chinese links where it is discussed. Would be even better if they also used ak or western weapons for a subjective comparison.

I just wanna give a rough comparison in my mind on how good buying a qbz-191 compared to just buying an m4a1 or ak-103. Sad that unit price still seems classified.
Based on my experience with the QBZ191 and the Type 95, the 191 has significantly improved ergonomics and manufacturing process over the Type 95. However, I'm only an artilleryman and don't have as much experience with rifles as infantrymen, so I'm sorry I can't answer you too much.
 
Top