I think it's pretty clear and obvious.Nah, you wrote "I don't see any point in continuing production of both Type-52D and the Type-55" after you wrote 3 destroyers per year, which at that point in the conversation was referring to a combined 052D/055 annual production rate. Nice try, though.
1st post: 3 large AEGIS air-defence destroyers per year.
2nd post: An argument that there is no point in continuing construction of Type-52D after the Type-55 is ready.
Given the low cost differential (est. 16%-25%) between the 2 types versus a much large increase in capability, it's obvious that it's better to stop Type-52D production entirely and move to Type-55.