PLAAF Munitions

styx

Junior Member
Registered Member
I wanted to ask if there are any sources on the web that classify Chinese aerial weaponry, including GPS bombs, missiles, dispensers, guided bombs, etc., because right now I'm extremely confused
 

Godswill

New Member
Registered Member
I wouldn't say that.

1. PL-15 is competitive or superior to AIM-120D variants, and the AIM-260 was developed partly informed by PL-15 as a response to it. We don't know if AIM-260 is comparable to PL-15 or if it may even be superior. However we do know that AIM-260 should have a AIM-120C/D footprint meaning it's a bit smaller than PL-15
2. PL-16 should have a smaller footprint than PL-15, but it should also be more capable than PL-15
3. PL-17 is a larger class of AAM than AIM-120D, PL-15 or AIM-260 or PL-16, both in terms of range and in terms of footprint.
- In terms of size/footprint (not necessarily capability only), PL-17 >>>> PL-15 > AIM-120C/D = AIM-260 = PL-16
By size/footprint you mean the overall size not the missile body right? IIRC, PL-16 is PL-15 with smaller fins.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
By size/footprint you mean the overall size not the missile body right? IIRC, PL-16 is PL-15 with smaller fins.

By size/footprint, I mean every aspect of the missile, including missile fuselage, fins etc.

We don't know what the PL-16 will be relative to PL-15 -- however considering the PL-15 comes in a folding fin variant (same missile fuselage as regular PL-15, but with folding fins), then I would be surprised if PL-16 directly reused the PL-15 missile fuselage but with just smaller fins, though such a possibility of course cannot be ruled out.


It is thus most correct to say "smaller footprint" than the standard PL-15 (non-folding fin variant) as all we definitively know about PL-16 is that J-20 and J-35 family should both respectively be able to carry six PL-16s internally versus four standard PL-15s.
 
Top