PLAAF H-10 bombers


Status
Not open for further replies.

challenge

Banned Idiot
俄罗斯军方证实;经过多年的紧张谈判,中国终于和俄罗斯达成了引进图-22M3生产线的协议,俄方同意转让全部技术资料,这标志着我国与俄罗斯就引进图-22M3生产线的谈判终于圆满的画上了句号。未来装备中国海军航空兵部队的图-22M3将命名为“轰10”。

俄罗斯开价15亿美金。同意转让给中国一条 “图-22M3生产线,现在,西飞已经开始了紧张的试制过程,预计明年下半年能造出第一架样机。由于俄国的图-22M3已经停产多年,所以所有部件,除发 动机外,将全部由我国制造。这次西飞能够快速进入“图-22M3”“轰-10”的生产试制任务,主要得益于我国先前进口的6架图-22m3轰炸机在空军服 役的经验积累,为空军科研单位吃透“图22M3”节点技术和西飞歼轰机研制部门对“图22M3”的改进研发提供了有力的技术论证条件。据说军方定货第一批 次为12架,第二批次为24架,共计36架。

Under $150 million agreement, Russia to provide China liscense to assemble TU-22M3 bomber.
under the aggreement,excluding the engine,China will produced important component.
PLAAF will also import (or lease?) 6 TU-22M3 from russia .allowing the chinese ground crews to familiar with the aircraft.
the first production batch quoted at 12 aircrafts, second batch at 24.total 36 aircraft.
 

zoom

Junior Member
俄罗斯军方证实;经过多年的紧张谈判,中国终于和俄罗斯达成了引进图-22M3生产线的协议,俄方同意转让全部技术资料,这标志着我国与俄罗斯就引进图-22M3生产线的谈判终于圆满的画上了句号。未来装备中国海军航空兵部队的图-22M3将命名为“轰10”。

俄罗斯开价15亿美金。同意转让给中国一条 “图-22M3生产线,现在,西飞已经开始了紧张的试制过程,预计明年下半年能造出第一架样机。由于俄国的图-22M3已经停产多年,所以所有部件,除发 动机外,将全部由我国制造。这次西飞能够快速进入“图-22M3”“轰-10”的生产试制任务,主要得益于我国先前进口的6架图-22m3轰炸机在空军服 役的经验积累,为空军科研单位吃透“图22M3”节点技术和西飞歼轰机研制部门对“图22M3”的改进研发提供了有力的技术论证条件。据说军方定货第一批 次为12架,第二批次为24架,共计36架。

Under $150 million agreement, Russia to provide China liscense to assemble TU-22M3 bomber.
under the aggreement,excluding the engine,China will produced important component.
PLAAF will also import (or lease?) 6 TU-22M3 from russia .allowing the chinese ground crews to familiar with the aircraft.
the first production batch quoted at 12 aircrafts, second batch at 24.total 36 aircraft.
Can you provide the source of this story. This forum has already discussed the possibilty of such an agreement but concluded that China's interest had cooled.
The Tu-22M intermediate bomber was out of production in 1993
Does this include the M3 ? If so isn't that a long time to then restart production?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Sorry ... but esp. in mind of Challenger's reliability in quoting - and once again without a source !! :mad: - real New's I think this is once again nothing more than BULLS..T !

Could You please learn and provide a link or so ... or at least start to think before You post something ?

Deino
 

A.Man

Major
Under $150 million agreement, Russia to provide China liscense to assemble TU-22M3 bomber.
under the aggreement,excluding the engine,China will produced important component.
PLAAF will also import (or lease?) 6 TU-22M3 from russia .allowing the chinese ground crews to familiar with the aircraft.
the first production batch quoted at 12 aircrafts, second batch at 24.total 36 aircraft.
My Friend,

This is a white elephant that no one wants it.

China really don't need it.
 

SteelBird

Major
Well, so far as I can remember, Challenge has just come back for a vocation for one week due to unlink post. Today he does the same thing though a link is added later on. I think such a report is too much unreliable especially when it mentioned China has imported 6 BackFire before. Anyone familiar with sinodefence would know that Russia intended to sell these BackFire back to Peace-Mission 2005, however, China wasn't interested. In fact, China was more interested in the newly produced Su-34. No one did mention about any possible deal so far.
 

rhino123

Pencil Pusher
VIP Professional
Challenge's usual reference is from the bullshit forum like the bbs.wforum and the strategypage. so there really is no need to pay heed to such nonsense until, unless some reputable sites or official statement are released.
 

siegecrossbow

Brigadier
Staff member
Super Moderator
Challenge's usual reference is from the bullshit forum like the bbs.wforum and the strategypage. so there really is no need to pay heed to such nonsense until, unless some reputable sites or official statement are released.
The real question is why are we still commenting on such b.s.?

I suggest that a mod close this thread. Having such topics will tarnish Sinodefence's reputation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top