PLA Strategy in a Taiwan Contingency

tamsen_ikard

Captain
Registered Member
Even radars in China would be like this, the difference is you cant dedicate over 100 of your aircraft for SEAD on a single target when you are at war with a major country. Any country can defeat any system with enough forces. And also what will this radar do on its own even if it did work? S-300 could simply just be destoryed.
If indeed these radars were defeated by EW, then the lesson for China is that they can also overpower enemy radar with their EW systems. They just need more of them. The need to invest a lot more in acquiring more powerful and more advanced EW aircraft and ground based EW. They need to overpower the enemy by several times. Its not like China lacks the tech to produce advanced EW.
 

supersnoop

Colonel
Registered Member
If indeed these radars were defeated by EW, then the lesson for China is that they can also overpower enemy radar with their EW systems. They just need more of them. The need to invest a lot more in acquiring more powerful and more advanced EW aircraft and ground based EW. They need to overpower the enemy by several times. Its not like China lacks the tech to produce advanced EW.

China already learned this lesson when a Growler/Prowler allegedly single handedly neutralized a large swath of coastal AD in the 2000's. China developed the J-16D/J-15D as a response and is basically the only peer aircraft of this type in the world. Even Russia doesn't have such a Flanker variant.
 

bebops

Junior Member
Registered Member
EW included jamming and spoofing are very powerful tool. It probably clogged the radar with many false signals.

In a warfare, you cannot just depend on the defense system. Defense system should be the last line of defense. I think the best defense is a good offense.
 

Tomboy

Captain
Registered Member
China already learned this lesson when a Growler/Prowler allegedly single handedly neutralized a large swath of coastal AD in the 2000's. China developed the J-16D/J-15D as a response and is basically the only peer aircraft of this type in the world. Even Russia doesn't have such a Flanker variant.
There are still a massive gap in number, on a side note China for some reason are still not equipping their helicopters with EW and DIRCM gear even ones that are expected to fight on the frontline while the US is now apparently extending these packages to normal army helicopters not only Marines.
 

tamsen_ikard

Captain
Registered Member
There are still a massive gap in number, on a side note China for some reason are still not equipping their helicopters with EW and DIRCM gear even ones that are expected to fight on the frontline while the US is now apparently extending these packages to normal army helicopters not only Marines.
China's biggest problem is still much lower budget. 1.5% of GDP for defense means lower priority items are not getting the upgrades. Ground force in general is suffering from outdated systems. China is also procuring hardware in a much slower rate overall. So, the their tip is cutting edge but those cutting edge systems are in service in only a handful of units. The bulk of the military is still using outdated gear whether its air, naval or ground force.
 

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator
A bunch of stealth radars. JY-27 were one of the newest radar for PLA

On the third comment, which I found it very fascinating, this guy wrote:

"The reasons why the surveillance network, primarily composed of Chinese-made equipment, failed to function can be summarized in the following three points: 1) Overwhelming by Next-Generation Electronic Warfare: The latest Next-Generation Jammer (NGJ-MB) aboard the U.S. Navy's EA-18G Growler completely overwhelmed Chinese anti-stealth radars like the JY-27 and JYL-1. Radar screens were filled with noise, preventing detection of approaching U.S. stealth aircraft like the F-35 and F-22. 2) Radar as a Double-Edged Sword: The moment Venezuelan forces increased radar output to search for targets, they became targets themselves for U.S. anti-radar missiles (AGM-88E) that detected the signal, instantly blinding their "eyes." No matter how powerful the fists—Russian-made air defense missiles—they had prepared, the Made-in-China "eyes" were blind. 3) Terrain-assisted infiltration: U.S. cruise missiles and special forces helicopters flew low, hugging the mountainous terrain, slipping beneath the radar's detection range."

you make the judgement whether he is correct or not.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I read his tweets and it is 100 percent anti-Chinese propaganda. In fact all of them are grievances about SCS. Extremely biased posting. You are better off quoting FLG sources or Collin Koh.

Also, do these cucks know that Venezuela operates more American radars than Chinese or even Russian ones?
 
Last edited:

CMP

Captain
Registered Member
I read his tweets and it is 100 percent anti-Chinese propaganda. In fact all of them are grievances about SCS. Extremely biased posting. You are better off quoting FLG sources or Collin Koh.

Also, do these cucks know that Venezuela operates more American radars than Chinese or even Russian ones?
I don't think they either know or care. Their duty is not to facts. Only to propaganda. Any facts that get in the way are only to be discarded, ignored, or dismissed.
 
Top