Occupy Central...News, Photos & Videos ONLY!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mr T

Senior Member
Are they insurgents, then?

I've never heard of a group of political activists who don't institute armed rebellion and primarily use protest/political campaigning to try to get what they want described as "insurgents". Google "insurgent" and you'll see people with guns. I don't recall seeing the students marching down roads in Hong Kong waving AK-47s.

regime change

They want a change in government leadership and the ability to directly nominate their leaders. That's demanding political reform/change, which happens all over the world quite regularly. "Regime change" would be like demanding the system be changed to a one-party state or something.

they told everyone (especially nay-sayers) to sod off as the future is theirs

I think it was more a question of saying to those in power - i.e. old people - "we are literally the future, so start listening to us". Young people are the future, and it is the case that the interests of young people around the world (especially in Asia) are routinely considered last, whilst priority is given to older people who've already had their time in the sun, have all the cash & assets and arguably don't need so much attention.

a local HK news report in Cantonese with Traditional Chinese subtitles and text about the HK government proposing funding exchange programs for HK primary and secondary school students (US grades 1-12 and 13 which doesn't have an exact equivalent) to visit other parts of China.

It's always a good idea to see other places, but shouldn't the national government be funding this? Hong Kong's budget isn't exactly bursting with spare cash. It would be peanuts to Beijing. (And if the central government is always complaining Hong Kongese don't "understand" China, perhaps they should do something about it.)

Also Beijing should ensure the reverse happens, with Chinese students seeing Hong Kong and learning what it's really like to live there. There's plenty of "Hong Kong has it so easy, stop whining" nonsense that floats around Chinese social media these days.
 
Last edited:

Mr T

Senior Member
And that's why there will not be any understanding because all the people protesting the HK authority aren't on the same page themselves.

Welcome to the democratic world. You can't say "oh well you guys aren't demanding exactly the same thing, so I'm not budging an inch". Politicians are there to thrash out compromises that don't please everyone but try to satisfy the majority. Democracy is about compromise. The protesters generally wanted reform on the nomination process for Chief Exec. That's not really something that can be disputed. A minority arguing for independence isn't relevant because it doesn't affect the key concern being put forward. It's like having a general agreement that trains are needed on a line, but arguing about the specific make. Does that mean you don't buy any trains at all? No.

now because of Jimmy Lai, the authorities he's been working against are now being associated with the terrorism in Paris?

Not exactly by everyone. And you've had people who were being just as hysterical about the students, saying that Hong Kong was going to crash and burn if they didn't immediately stop their protests. Funnily enough, the city is still fine - how long did the protests go on for?

Obama does it so it must be all right.

I think "Obama does it so it must be all right" was a view held by some people in the immediate aftermath of his 2008 victory. It didn't even last the majority of his first term of office, let alone past the 2012 election. Besides, that some people think Obama is perfect doesn't really have any relation to whether the Hong Kong student movement has legitimate concerns or not.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Welcome to the democratic world. You can't say "oh well you guys aren't demanding exactly the same thing, so I'm not budging an inch". Politicians are there to thrash out compromises that don't please everyone but try to satisfy the majority. Democracy is about compromise. The protesters generally wanted reform on the nomination process for Chief Exec. That's not really something that can be disputed. A minority arguing for independence isn't relevant because it doesn't affect the key concern being put forward. It's like having a general agreement that trains are needed on a line, but arguing about the specific make. Does that mean you don't buy any trains at all? No.



Not exactly by everyone. And you've had people who were being just as hysterical about the students, saying that Hong Kong was going to crash and burn if they didn't immediately stop their protests. Funnily enough, the city is still fine - how long did the protests go on for?



I think "Obama does it so it must be all right" was a view held by some people in the immediate aftermath of his 2008 victory. It didn't even last the majority of his first term of office, let alone past the 2012 election. Besides, that some people think Obama is perfect doesn't really have any relation to whether the Hong Kong student movement has legitimate concerns or not.

I hope you're not attributing to me saying those things because I didn't. You do know I was born in the US so you don't have to explain to me about democracy. You only prove how these protestors aren't democratic because they all stubbornly are uncompromising to one another. That ain't democracy because they've shown they have no respect for anyone else's position. Which mean they only hide behind democracy for international sympathy not because they believe in it which they obviously don't.

BTW, aren't you the one that said Hong Kong didn't deserve democracy when the British were in control because at the time of acquiring Hong Kong, Great Britain didn't have democracy?
 

MwRYum

Major
Have they taken up arms in the streets then?

I believe the answer to both questions is the same...no.
They haven't had guns yet but they've homemade weapon and tried to mass manufacturing them at underground arsenal, but it was busted. The arrested operator is a known drag queen and an active separatist.

And in the undergrad publications by the HKUSU last year, they've published several articles advocate separatism, and another book that's qualify as pseudo manifesto for separatism, up and including instigate "armed revolution" locally, plus other that's clearly wet dream ideas...saying those are wet dreams, but we need to remember "Mein Kampf" also wet dream, but look at what happen to Germany...

The reason I brought it up is that also those are not news as those have been reported last year, but those have been largely whitewashed over by the pro-insurgency media, and only now the CE threw it out in the open.

I've never heard of a group of political activists who don't institute armed rebellion and primarily use protest/political campaigning to try to get what they want described as "insurgents". Google "insurgent" and you'll see people with guns. I don't recall seeing the students marching down roads in Hong Kong waving AK-47s.



They want a change in government leadership and the ability to directly nominate their leaders. That's demanding political reform/change, which happens all over the world quite regularly. "Regime change" would be like demanding the system be changed to a one-party state or something.



I think it was more a question of saying to those in power - i.e. old people - "we are literally the future, so start listening to us". Young people are the future, and it is the case that the interests of young people around the world (especially in Asia) are routinely considered last, whilst priority is given to older people who've already had their time in the sun, have all the cash & assets and arguably don't need so much attention.



It's always a good idea to see other places, but shouldn't the national government be funding this? Hong Kong's budget isn't exactly bursting with spare cash. It would be peanuts to Beijing. (And if the central government is always complaining Hong Kongese don't "understand" China, perhaps they should do something about it.)

Also Beijing should ensure the reverse happens, with Chinese students seeing Hong Kong and learning what it's really like to live there. There's plenty of "Hong Kong has it so easy, stop whining" nonsense that floats around Chinese social media these days.

That shows how many of you don't really speak the language, or physically lives here. Unlike me, I've to listen to them lies for 2 years prior to this, then 79 days and nights of such anarchy, and after that witness all of them backtracking their pledge of completing the "civil disobedience" process with all sorts of excuses and so smug about it.

If you can read chinese, then you'd find their messages is so different from their English propaganda - they do demand a regime change, topple not just the local government but total independence from mainland China, and they to be in charge.

And when I said they told others to sod off, that was not just aimed at the government, but at any and everyone who are "not them". I was there, and heard such proclaimations day and night for 79 days straight, both online and real world, so there's no mistake. What didn't made onto pro-insurgency media doesn't mean it's not true.

Those messages were yell in the same fervor as "Juden Raus!" In Nazi Germany.

Unlike you lot, I've been living in HK for the last 10 years straight, and for last 3 years have seen, on firsthand account, how that bunch running their propaganda; and since day 1 I opposed them, because it'd only make Beijing more determined to slam the door, instead of caving in. On that account I've been vindicated.

So, you said nothing broken and burnt, huh? By technicality they did smash the glass doors of the LegCo building; more disturbingly is they've and still do, propagating anarchism like nothing seen in HK before, specifically instigating youth in hating the police and hinting attack against the same. Only this week a youth was arrested in possession of weapons and Molotov cocktails. Anarchism has taken root and the insurgents are busy fanning the flame.

The upcoming February 1st the same bunch is set to organize another protest, so let's see if I get vindicated yet again? Honestly, I rather be proven wrong.
 

MwRYum

Major
Not that it matters what British think about Hong Kong affairs.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


"
UK Foreign Office Accepts Beijing’s Plan for Hong Kong Elections
“Genuine choice” possible under current electoral reform plan, British officials tell Parliament.

"

Now won't that makes you wonder where them Tommies are going with such statement? It's not like Beijing would reward London with more trade contracts or something because of that.

Another case in point as to how much do those undergrads know - a more recent slogan of them to justify their act is that "we're living in this troubled times"...well first this is troubled times because they are part of the problem and blissfully adding fuel into the fire, and second they've clearly forgotten that, what kind of people would come out on top in troubled times? That's right, dictators, without exceptions, because only dictators have the stone-cold heart and steel resolve to make the hard choices on the dime, a necessity to persevere in troubled times. Also without exception, common folks will flock to dictators because such characters shows the resolve needed solve the problem. It's a tested and tried formula throughout the human history, and when crisis was over and dictators lingers on power then we've tyranny, which is also historically proven.

So, they think all their work will herald the bright shining democratic future of HK? More like backstabbing and snuffing out its last breath if you ask me.
 

flyzies

Junior Member
They haven't had guns yet but they've homemade weapon and tried to mass manufacturing them at underground arsenal, but it was busted. The arrested operator is a known drag queen and an active separatist.

And in the undergrad publications by the HKUSU last year, they've published several articles advocate separatism, and another book that's qualify as pseudo manifesto for separatism, up and including instigate "armed revolution" locally, plus other that's clearly wet dream ideas...saying those are wet dreams, but we need to remember "Mein Kampf" also wet dream, but look at what happen to Germany...

The reason I brought it up is that also those are not news as those have been reported last year, but those have been largely whitewashed over by the pro-insurgency media, and only now the CE threw it out in the open.



That shows how many of you don't really speak the language, or physically lives here. Unlike me, I've to listen to them lies for 2 years prior to this, then 79 days and nights of such anarchy, and after that witness all of them backtracking their pledge of completing the "civil disobedience" process with all sorts of excuses and so smug about it.

If you can read chinese, then you'd find their messages is so different from their English propaganda - they do demand a regime change, topple not just the local government but total independence from mainland China, and they to be in charge.

And when I said they told others to sod off, that was not just aimed at the government, but at any and everyone who are "not them". I was there, and heard such proclaimations day and night for 79 days straight, both online and real world, so there's no mistake. What didn't made onto pro-insurgency media doesn't mean it's not true.

Those messages were yell in the same fervor as "Juden Raus!" In Nazi Germany.

Unlike you lot, I've been living in HK for the last 10 years straight, and for last 3 years have seen, on firsthand account, how that bunch running their propaganda; and since day 1 I opposed them, because it'd only make Beijing more determined to slam the door, instead of caving in. On that account I've been vindicated.

So, you said nothing broken and burnt, huh? By technicality they did smash the glass doors of the LegCo building; more disturbingly is they've and still do, propagating anarchism like nothing seen in HK before, specifically instigating youth in hating the police and hinting attack against the same. Only this week a youth was arrested in possession of weapons and Molotov cocktails. Anarchism has taken root and the insurgents are busy fanning the flame.

The upcoming February 1st the same bunch is set to organize another protest, so let's see if I get vindicated yet again? Honestly, I rather be proven wrong.

I completely agree. Jeff's and Mr T's answer is typical of those who only read mainstream Western media reporting on those occupy protests. Reading local media in Chinese or even better, being there amongst the protests, would give you a totally different perspective.
 

Mr T

Senior Member
You only prove how these protestors aren't democratic because they all stubbornly are uncompromising to one another.

I thought they were very democratic. They even had votes amongst themselves to try to figure out what their next steps were. Besides, everyone has the right to express a view and stick to it. It's the politicians who decide who to act on those views.

BTW, aren't you the one that said Hong Kong didn't deserve democracy when the British were in control because at the time of acquiring Hong Kong, Great Britain didn't have democracy?

I don't think I said that. You've had to dig out the post and link me to it.

Besides, Hong Kong is supposed to have universal suffrage under the Basic Law. That's what we're dealing with.

Not that it matters what British think about Hong Kong affairs.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


"
UK Foreign Office Accepts Beijing’s Plan for Hong Kong Elections
“Genuine choice” possible under current electoral reform plan, British officials tell Parliament.

"

Shen, that is an extremely misleading and selective quotation. The article continues lower down.

The current framework for electoral reform “may not be perfect,” Swire said, but “something is better than nothing.”

That's not exactly a ringing endorsement of the system. In fact, it's the lowest possible level of endorsement.

By the way, Britain's view does matter. Hong Kong and Kowloon were handed over to China in a treaty, which also guaranteed the city certain rights. So we can say whether we think that treaty is being observed properly.

If China finds this all too hard, we can always have Hong Kong back and look after it ourselves - or cut it up, and China can administer the New Territories.
 
Last edited:

Skywatcher

Captain
By the way, Britain's view does matter. Hong Kong and Kowloon were handed over to China in a treaty, which also guaranteed the city certain rights. So we can say whether we think that treaty is being observed properly.

If China finds this all too hard, we can always have Hong Kong back and look after it ourselves - or cut it up, and China can administer the New Territories.

Do you know how absolutely stupid that sounds? There's nothing in the Treaty saying that you (and your imaginary friends) gets Hong Kong back. Why don't you ask for the 13 colonies back while you're at it, genius?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top