News on China's scientific and technological development.

9dashline

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Chinese tech giant Baidu Inc will cultivate 5 million artificial intelligence talents in the next 5 years, aiming to create a well-rounded tech labor force and power AI growth, said Robin Li, co-founder and CEO.

Li made the remarks at the Emerging Engineering International Forum 2021, hosted by his alma mater Peking University, on Saturday. "In daily work, it is very important to shift our mindset from a scientific one to an engineering one – going from a one-step process to a step-by-step process," Li said.

While a scientific approach can produce fruitful and thorough results, an engineering approach is incremental, strategic and ultimately more useful, he added.

According to Li, both Baidu and Tesla are adopting a step-by-step engineering approach to autonomous driving. While Tesla is gradually advancing the autonomous driving levels, Baidu prioritizes expanding the driving range of self-driving vehicles.

By practicing the operation of self-driving cars in smaller areas where the conditions are more conducive to testing, Baidu said they are able to gradually learn and improve to expand the geographical scope of autonomous driving, while gradually upgrading the abilities of the autonomous cars.

Since 2015, the Beijing-based company has supported the Ministry of Education's industry-university cooperation and collaborative education project, training more than 3,000 teachers across more than 700 universities.

Li said in today's world, it is expected that job applicants have an understanding of artificial intelligence to find a job in the technology industry. As such, he has committed the company to develop 5 million AI talents over five years to help job seekers grow their skills toolbox, creating more well-rounded talent.
Star Trek got it all wrong, its AI, not space, thats the Final Frontier.

China's so-called demographic problem can be solved by technology, its the only solution forward.
 

Petrolicious88

Senior Member
Registered Member
Their idea of STEM immigration reform is basically hire tons of Indians on H-1Bs. I'll let everyone guess how that worked out in the past.
It worked out pretty well for America.

Satya Nadella - Microsoft
Shantanu Narayen - Adobe
Ajaypal Singh Banga - MasterCard
Sundar Pichai - Google
Sanjay Mehrotra - Sandisk
Vinod Khosla - Sun Microsystems
Arvind Krishna - IBM
Nikesh Arora - Palo Alto Networks
Niraz Shah - Wayfare, and former Boston Fed chairman
Sonia Syngal - GAP

30% of CEOs in Silicon Valley are Indian Americans; many are first or second generation immigrants that graduated from Indian Institute of Technology.

But, despite similar educational backgrounds, very few Chinese Americans make it to the top of the corporate ladder.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
It worked out pretty well for America.

Satya Nadella - Microsoft
Shantanu Narayen - Adobe
Ajaypal Singh Banga - MasterCard
Sundar Pichai - Google
Sanjay Mehrotra - Sandisk
Vinod Khosla - Sun Microsystems
Arvind Krishna - IBM
Nikesh Arora - Palo Alto Networks
Niraz Shah - Wayfare, and former Boston Fed chairman
Sonia Syngal - GAP

30% of CEOs in Silicon Valley are Indian Americans; many are first or second generation immigrants that graduated from Indian Institute of Technology.

But, despite similar educational backgrounds, very few Chinese Americans make it to the top of the corporate ladder.
It worked out great for Indians. For America itself? Yet to be seen unless you mean by the "innovation" of importing caste system, slavery, nepotism, racism and religious fundamentalism to the US.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
It worked out pretty well for America.

Satya Nadella - Microsoft
Shantanu Narayen - Adobe
Ajaypal Singh Banga - MasterCard
Sundar Pichai - Google
Sanjay Mehrotra - Sandisk
Vinod Khosla - Sun Microsystems
Arvind Krishna - IBM
Nikesh Arora - Palo Alto Networks
Niraz Shah - Wayfare, and former Boston Fed chairman
Sonia Syngal - GAP
Let's have the full balance sheet
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
This talented individual singlehandedly destroyed Intel's lead in chip manufacturing. Certainly an impressive result, but one that can't be called positive.

I'm sure I could find many more examples if I could be bothered.
30% of CEOs in Silicon Valley are Indian Americans; many are first or second generation immigrants that graduated from Indian Institute of Technology.
First, if you utter a number here you should back it up with sources. Second, even if your dubious "30%" claim is taken at face value, it's no great mystery. Indian immigrants managed to set up a pipeline in the US tech industry and advance their own through nepotism. Or do you think the graduates of one particular Indian university (not even in the top 100 globally) are especially gifted and won their places purely on their merit?
But, despite similar educational backgrounds, very few Chinese Americans make it to the top of the corporate ladder.
Your attempt at giving insult backfired almost as spectacularly as Intel's decision to give a leadership position to that Indian engineer.
 

Petrolicious88

Senior Member
Registered Member
It’s a legitimate question. Why is that Chinese Americans have similar STEM backgrounds as their Indian colleagues, and yet remain under represented in executive positions.

Is it all through nepotism, racism, caste favoritism, or it’s because many have better English skills, better communication skills and ability to manage up. They do have an advantage in these areas.

Intel may have been f*k up by Renduchinta, but Google, Microsoft, Adobe all seems to be doing pretty well.
 
Last edited:

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
It’s a legitimate question. Why is that Chinese Americans have similar STEM backgrounds as their Indian colleagues, and yet remain under represented in executive positions.

Is it all through nepotism, racism, caste favoritism, or it’s because many do actually have better English skills, better communication skills and ability to manage up. They do have an advantage in these areas.

Intel may have been f*k up by Renduchinta, but Google, Microsoft, Adobe all seems to be doing pretty well.
Ok you can reverse the question: if Indians are so great and have such amazing managerial skills how come they didn't found any of these companies? And what about India itself, if they're so good at managing how come they can't even manage India?
 

Petrolicious88

Senior Member
Registered Member
Ok you can reverse the question: if Indians are so great and have such amazing managerial skills how come they didn't found any of these companies? And what about India itself, if they're so good at managing how come they can't even manage India?
Because the smartest and brightest engineers from India immigrate to America. It’s not a bad deal for America.
 
Top