Miscellaneous News

bajingan

Senior Member
What did china gained from it ?

India and Japan just had 2+2 quad meeting and gave statement regarding open indo Pacific, rule based order.

India won't leave quad, and would do more cooperation with quad, disengagement in Himalaya is only helping india to put more focus on indo Pacific .
india does not have a navy capable of challenging China in scs or taiwan straits, plus as long as China and Pakistan remain tight, no way will india goes full retard against China, similar situation with SK being checked by NK, and if China play her card right she can use Russia to check japan
 

bajingan

Senior Member
I
are they tight these days? aren't they shifting towards the us? e.g. bomb at 孔子学院 in pakistan
I think pakistan military (the people who holds real power in pakistan) still pretty tight with PLA, this unlikely to change no matter who is the PM
 

Jiang ZeminFanboy

Senior Member
Registered Member
Global growth rates

FcNu8lUXgAQSYg-
 

emblem21

Major
Registered Member
Queen Elizabeth's death is not good news for British-Chinese relations. King Charles is a massive Sinophobe, and so is Liz Truss. He refused to meet Xi when he last met with the royal family, he is a friend of Dalai Lama, during the handover he called the Chinese leadership “appalling old waxworks”. China should prepare for the worst when it comes to the UK.
Who cares, King Charles has inherited a nation that is quickly going down into the toilet. Who gives a crap and in the event that the UK goes completely bust, they will either start begging China for help or simply put, as the Irish chant, end up ‘Lizzy in a Box’ because many of these nations that the UK have colonised are not really giving a shit about her fate and to be Frank, what does she really add to the world other then Kodak photo shoots. Besides if the queen is really a good person, she wouldn’t be defending a known pedofile that happens to be her own son who has also hanged out with another famous Pedofile in Epstein. So really, no appologies for the crap down in all those other nations that the UK has colonised and killed countless children world over over, hence why the leaders might show come respect but the people by and large are celebrating. Well I guess it’s just one more step into irrelevancy for the UK
 
Last edited:

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
What did china gained from it ?

India and Japan just had 2+2 quad meeting and gave statement regarding open indo Pacific, rule based order.

India won't leave quad, and would do more cooperation with quad, disengagement in Himalaya is only helping india to put more focus on indo Pacific .
Lol what are they (India) can realistically do in the Asia-Pacific buddy? Please do tell. What would you have liked for China to do? Keep pressing for a land area that's strategically insignificant? It's not like China has decided to withdraw their troops away from that zone that it'll give Indian military preponderance advantage if and when conflict happens.

We'll see how this situation unfolds and how India reacts or acts in these coming days, months, and next. If India keeps provoking China to the point of no return then at least India will have no one to blame but themselves since China has tried to defuse the situation to no avail. India ain't that dumb, they know their military capabilities are not up to par yet with China's military despite some of their military leaders wishful thinking and Jai Hind pronouncements.

Their newly inducted A.C. INS Vikrant doesn't even know what plane to be used that's after 13 years of waiting and waiting....

China understands India's oversized ambitions and oversized egos that love to give themselves credit for GIFTING CHINA a permanent U.N. seat, and for viewing themselves as somehow superior to China in some weird non-existing metrics called democracy and freedom.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Damn, Kim has planet-sized balls.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Kim's government has now passed a law which enshrines the right to use pre-emptive nuclear strikes to protect its nation.
Kim said the new law would make its nuclear status "irreversible" and bar any denuclearisation talks, state media reported on Friday.
In his speech to the parliament, Kim said: "The utmost significance of legislating nuclear weapons policy is to draw an irretrievable line so that there can be no bargaining over our nuclear weapons."
the new law goes beyond that to outline when nuclear weapons can be used, including to respond to an attack, or stop an invasion.
It also allows for pre-emptive nuclear strikes if an imminent attack by weapons of mass destruction or against the country's "strategic targets" is detected.
 
Top