Muh "QuEEn LiZZy didn't have blood on her hands"You need to learn the difference between the British royal in the 50s and the Japanese royal in the 30s, and their respective political power in their countries, then come back to discuss.
Besides, by the 50s the British empire was already in great decline and had started the withdrawal of many colonies, sure by necessity and not by choice or good will. Queen Elizabeth didn't have blood on her hands if that's what you try to insinuate.
Tell that to the Kenyans killed in the Mau Mau uprising. How about millions in the rest of the world who suffered under British Imperialism under her rule.
Try harder please imperialist apologist.