Miscellaneous News

james smith esq

Senior Member
Registered Member
Again, should a war happen, australia is going to taste the kind of defeat that will resound throughout history as something that is quite frankly avoidable but due to pure stupidity, they went for it anyway like a brain dead bogan. But if this finally destroys Australia’s ability to wage war forever and helps to ensure that the dreams of a Anglo Saxon resurgence remain dead for all time. I can’t wait for China to finally take the gloves off and finally should the world just what happens if you anger the dragon one time too many
There are two ways to deal with a bully and his gang:
(1) take down the bully and scatter the gang
(2) take out lesser members and attrit the gang ‘til it scatters

My take is to take out the most expedient lesser member and give the others pause. In the case of the 5 eyes, I’d pick Japan. However, given Anglo-supremacy, Japan might simply be sacrificed in an attempt to weaken China. I mean, would they really miss a few hundred thousand Japs? So, is Australia the next most expedient lesser member?

But, honestly, I don’t expect punk-assed Australia to do a GODAMNED thing!!
 

Tyler

Captain
Registered Member
Again, should a war happen, australia is going to taste the kind of defeat that will resound throughout history as something that is quite frankly avoidable but due to pure stupidity, they went for it anyway like a brain dead bogan. But if this finally destroys Australia’s ability to wage war forever and helps to ensure that the dreams of a Anglo Saxon resurgence remain dead for all time. I can’t wait for China to finally take the gloves off and finally should the world just what happens if you anger the dragon one time too many
Any actions would need a regional ally like Indonesia. That would ensure a uniform transfer of power.
 

KYli

Brigadier
Sounds like you could be talking about the US.
No, the US is beyond help. Its politicians are already in the elites' pocket. For example, the US could easily lower their drugs and prescription costs by allowing collective bargaining with the pharmaceutical companies but nothing is done so Americans end up paying hundreds of billions extra each year for prescription costs alone.

On the other hand, the Chinese government sets up a system to force pharmaceutical companies to compete against each others in order to include in the government funded prescription program which guarantee a big purchase so many drugs prices drop between 60% to 99% which greatly beneficial toward both the Chinese government and Chinese patients.
 

Maula Jatt

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Taliban spokesmen said they see China as a friend to Afghanistan, would welcome Chinese investors and works and guarantee their safety if they return. They also no longer allow Uyghur separatist fighters among their rank.
Looks like all the Muslim countries are doing a runner from Uyghur issue

When even a fundamentalist group refuse to talk about Uyghurs that shows how this issue is reduced to

US PR campaigns against China and Indians justifying Kashmir and how good they have it compared to a genocide and the hypocrisy of Pak

How

A- West failed in it's propoganda
or
B- Muslims countries/group sold out to Chinese money/influence


I say it's a bit of both but whatever it is when even Taliban refuse to say anything about Uyghur that shows this issue doesn't concern Muslims people/society and when it doesn't impact them this issue will die down in couple of years unless the west get some major Muslim countries to stand with them on this issue

Cause you can't create a narrative of a muslim genocide without a major muslim nation supporting that claim

That seems stupid
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Looks like all the Muslim countries are doing a runner from Uyghur issue

When even a fundamentalist group refuse to talk about Uyghurs that shows how this issue is reduced to

US PR campaigns against China and Indians justifying Kashmir and how good they have it compared to a genocide and the hypocrisy of Pak

How

A- West failed in it's propoganda
or
B- Muslims countries/group sold out to Chinese money/influence


I say it's a bit of both but whatever it is when even Taliban refuse to say anything about Uyghur that shows this issue doesn't concern Muslims people/society and when it doesn't impact them this issue will die down in couple of years unless the west get some major Muslim countries to stand with them on this issue

Cause you can't create a narrative of a muslim genocide without a major muslim nation supporting that claim

That seems stupid
When you wage war on muslims for 20 years straight across mulitple countries it kind of destroys your credibility with them.
 

KenC

Junior Member
Registered Member
When you wage war on muslims for 20 years straight across mulitple countries it kind of destroys your credibility with them.
Also, the majority of Muslims are not that naïve as to believe in Xinjiang genocide story being perpetuated by the West.
There is just no solid evidence to back that up. Those ludicrous stories and so-called massive concentration camps findings by the West are laughable. Mind you that the diplomats from Muslim nations in China have first hand knowledge of the situation in Xinjiang.
 

emblem21

Major
Registered Member
Also, the majority of Muslims are not that naïve as to believe in Xinjiang genocide story being perpetuated by the West.
There is just no solid evidence to back that up. Those ludicrous stories and so-called massive concentration camps findings by the West are laughable. Mind you that the diplomats from Muslim nations in China have first hand knowledge of the situation in Xinjiang.
At this point in time, the USA has become a massive liability to the world at large. Imagine the relief the muslims and many nations around the world if a real disaster happens to the usa since at this point it is becoming more and more overdue due to how much blood lust the neo cons have right now
 

Maula Jatt

Junior Member
Registered Member
At this point in time, the USA has become a massive liability to the world at large. Imagine the relief the muslims and many nations around the world if a real disaster happens to the usa since at this point it is becoming more and more overdue due to how much blood lust the neo cons have right now
Yeah the world economy would collapse lol
 

KYli

Brigadier
If China didn't ground 737MAX, the US, the UK, Canada, and EASA would still allow the plane to fly. Just because the plane is clear by EASA and the US, it doesn't mean the plane is safe. And China doesn't need the US approval to export C919, not sure what Bloomberg is smoking.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(Bloomberg) -- Chinese aviation officials have signaled they are open to conducting flight tests on Boeing Co.’s 737 Max, a step toward lifting the plane’s grounding in that nation after more than two years, according to people familiar with the matter.

Details of a validation flight for the Max in China are still being worked out, but the discussions are a sign of possible progress in what has become a lengthy standoff over the plane, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the discussions are private. Boeing is preparing to send a delegation of around 35 pilots and engineers to meet with regulators in late July after they undergo weeks of quarantine, one of the people said.

It could still take many months after such a flight before China’s air regulators wrap up their work and lift the flying ban -- particularly if there is no break in the heightened trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies.

China’s regulators in March said they had “major concerns” about the plane, including design changes, new pilot training and the causes of the two Max crashes. But they have said little about why they are taking so much longer to assess the redesign and clear the plane than regulators in the U.S., Europe and Canada. Their lengthy review has fanned speculation that politics is a factor now that the plane has been cleared by more than 170 countries.

“It’s nothing to do with aviation, safety or aviation safety,” Richard Aboulafia, a long-time watcher of the aerospace industry at the Teal Group, said in a recent interview. “It’s way above our pay grades, way above our heads. It’s geopolitics.”



Boeing shares quickly turned positive on the news, rising as much as 2.5% to $237.47.

The fate of the plane is not only entangled in U.S.-China relations, but it’s also seen as a possible bargaining chip in negotiations between the two countries over aviation trade issues and new jet orders.

China relies heavily on U.S. technology for its new flagship jetliner, expected to make its commercial debut later this year. And China will need U.S. approval if it ever exports the C919 aircraft, while American manufacturers like General Electric Co. stand to benefit as the counterpart to the 737 Max moves forward.

The implications are enormous for Boeing, which is leaning on the commercial comeback of the 737 Max to fund the company’s financial turnaround and to help pay down its $64 billion debt. A lengthy disruption to U.S. production for the jets could weigh on President Joe Biden’s pledge to stoke domestic employment.

Another person familiar with the discussions said China authorities are in talks about performing Max simulator sessions, but declined to say what the prospects are for an actual flight.

Both simulator runs and flight tests preceded the decision to lift the ban in the U.S. and Europe, but some nations haven’t required them before allowing the plane to resume normal operations.

A spokesperson for the Civil Aviation Administration of China said the agency had no update to provide on progress toward the Max’s return to service in the country.

Boeing didn’t address China specifically when asked about the potential for a test flight, saying only that it was working with aviation regulators around the world. “We refer you to those regulators for more information,” the company said in an emailed statement.

China was the first nation to ground the Max, acting within hours of a fatal crash in Ethiopia on March 10, 2019, and hasn’t allowed the single-aisle workhorse to fly since, crimping jet sales in Boeing’s largest overseas market. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration lifted the grounding in November, and the European Aviation Safety Agency and Transport Canada followed in January.

Under aviation treaty agreements, the FAA took the lead role in recertifying the Max, working closely with the handful of nations that have existing airliner manufacturing sectors. As has occurred with other nations, China has the option of validating the FAA’s work under the treaty.

The FAA has provided China with technical briefings about the work, according to the people.


Typically, one of the final steps before a certification is a test flight. Pilots for the FAA, EASA and Transport Canada all conducted such flights shortly before lifting their flight bans.

Boeing has previously sent delegations to China since the grounding and there’s no guarantee the recent talks will result in the flying ban being lifted.

The Max was grounded for 18 months in the U.S. after the second of two crashes; 346 people were killed in the two accidents. Both crashes were at least partly caused by a flight-control system that malfunctioned, repeatedly prompting the plane to dive on its own.

The system has since been redesigned to prevent it from activating repeatedly and to add redundancy so that it’s less likely to malfunction, among other changes.

Boeing Chief Executive Officer Dave Calhoun has warned that a prolonged trade deadlock threatens its plans to hike output next year of the 737 Max, the Chicago-based company’s main source of revenue. The manufacturer’s longstanding role as a U.S. industrial champion and largest exporter is also in jeopardy.

If the company isn’t allowed to serve the China market, it will “cede global leadership,” Calhoun said last month. “I’ll never give up on that. But it’s going to create real issues for us in the next couple of years if we can’t thaw out some of the trade structure.”

The U.S. is “absolutely working on” pushing China to move on the Max, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said last month in an interview on Bloomberg Television.
 
Top