@voyager1 bro its a dog and pony show, that process may take years to settled and a big IF will China comply? If the Aussie won its a pyrrhic victory cause they had alienated their biggest customer and choose not to buy from them anymore.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
I don't disagree with any reality but actions speak louder than words. What someone says or believes is only a background to what they are doing. I asked you by what mechanisms Chinese people exert more control over their economy and you don't have an answer. You just gave me a name and told me, this is what the CCP says and believes. I asked for real functional mechanisms. They are what matter.
Nothing except the core principle that social inequality needs to be diminished and if you are accumulating wealth at a rate far above the average then you are detrimental to this core goal.
Everything else equal, size is the difference between then and now so size is the only relevance in this comparison.
Look, here's a better and simpler question: is China in 2021 a more or less equal society than China in 1949?
Why 20? Why not all the way back to 1949 at the founding of the PRC?
If this is the basis of your argument, then it cannot stand. Simply look at all the nations in the world and see that many have greater social equality in 2021 than 2001. You will argue that they are all socialist?
That's good, but it's not a function exclusive to socialist economies.
You're the one using actions that occur in both capitalist nations and China as evidence that China is socialist. The commonalities between China and the world's successful capitalist economies don't prove that China is capitalist, and I never made that claim, but they sure as heck can't be used as evidence for the opposite.
You cannot give a working mechanism for this, only theory and vague concepts.
It's both the elite controlling the common people. In neither of these systems do the people constitute anything close to a dictatorship in any way that would be untrue for the other. I mean in terms of working mechanisms, not vague slogans.
Any way to get the 60mins today in which Australia portrays NZ as some back stabber ?
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Drive doesn't matter; result matters. If your drive was to become rich and the result is that in order to achieve your goal, you invented technology that bettered your society, it matters not that you did it for selfish reasons. That is why capitalism is stronger than socialism by far. The result in that story you just made is that two people who could do nothing with what they had alone came together and made something. They forced it on no one, but gave everyone a choice to pay for your product/service. That is not exploitation. Slavery is exploitation; selling goods/services at a price that you deem too high is not. Just walk away instead of complaining if you don't like the deal.
English Fail.
Cooperation- noun, "the process of working together to the same end."
It says nothing about equality.
Don't borrow money you can't repay. If you made an agreement of your own free will, then you cannot claim exploitation. If you think someone is exploiting you, leave the negotiating table and pretend he doesn't exist. To think that someone owes you the favorable terms that you need to do well despite your lack of leverage to earn them is just a false sense of self-entitlement.
Your reading comprehension is laughable. This was a rely to Nutrient saying that no markets are needed and everyone should do everything themselves with resources as cheap as dirt. As ridiculous communism and socialism are, neither have went this far.
And why are they embargoed? Why are they not embargoing capitalist nations into the ground? Because they are weak and that is because socialism is weak.
Did you see some legal terms in my writing?
No, I am a realist. I think these countries have the right to develop their own defenses and sell their own oil and it makes me angry truly, to see the US bully them. I want to see them give the US a bloody nose for sticking its nose where it doesn't belong. But I will never see it because they are far too weak to do anything to capitalist America.
Better than what?
I never said capitalism is nice; I said it works to make a country strong.
American dominance and bullying of weak socialist nations make you roll on the floor with laughter? That's cruel...
Last edited:
Chinese army ads: discipline, patriotism, strength
Russian army ads: discipline, patriotism, strength
American army ads: TWO MOMS
Read on the comments there, lots of amusing ones.... I can't help of LMAO
truly funny!!!
The best way to identify the surname in the case of just one syllable first name is to capitalize the surname!
Not long ago I encountered Chinese name written "Hong Liu" in some English publication, just the Pinyin without its Chinese character, then upon my bad, I get confused his surname "HONG" or "LIU" since both could be legitimate surnames -- but I should have known that in English paper the Chinese author should have been written as First name - Surname order.
However if Chinese name like "Hong Liu" in other English news pieces and elsewhere can be randomly written as "Hong Liu" or "Liu Hong" then I will get confused about his correct surname (because both names, Hong and Liu, can be a legitimate surname). Problem will be solved if it's written as "Hong LIU" / "LIU Hong".
Well, for me, since I just write in internet, not the academic paper
, I always use Surname - First name for Chinese name following its natural order in native language!I deliberately don't follow the Western rule for writing Chinese name in all English language posts
and whereas relevant /necessary -- as in the one-syllable first name -- I just capitalize the surname to avoid any ambiguity.
Chinese army ads: discipline, patriotism, strength
Russian army ads: discipline, patriotism, strength
American army ads: TWO MOMS
Read on the comments there, lots of amusing ones.... I can't help of LMAO
They just wiped out white people from the recruitment poster.
Next thing you know they're gonna feature a shemale and a transvestite raising a Native American boy born with gigantism #diversity
