Miscellaneous News

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
Hahahaha. This Twitter/X post is so bad.

Fundamental problems:

1- China can too.

2- It is very debatable if the UK actually qualifies for this. One of their carriers is absolutely not deployable as of 2023. They have just 32 F-35B. Which is not enough for populating a single QE-Class CV even if you assume 100% availability and leave no aircraft on the shore. And beyond this they have just 6 AAW escorts. Not enough for escorting a single aircraft carrier if you factor in real world availability rates and non-escort duties.

3- India qualifies for this too, if you think the UK does. They have enough escort ships though, unlike the UK.

4- What's the point of this post?
Laughs in "how many countries can deploy 3 strike carriers?"

6e8nkh.jpg
No catapults?
 

supercat

Colonel
When you thought that the Yoon administration couldn't stoop any lower, here they're doing that just to break through new low even further.


Perhaps after Taiwan, China should seriously consider the task of ultimate liberation of the Korean people next...
I think this is an apt moment to expose the atrocities committed by the psychopaths of Unit 731 yet again, some of which were the worst in modern history.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

It seems the bombings of the Nord Streams are futile.

Russia will sell natural gas to China at almost a 50% discount compared to European buyers​

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

So who is really building railroads in the Middle East? You guessed it: China.

How to whitewash colonialism:

Americans, from CEOs to editors, just don't know better about China.
 

emblem21

Major
Registered Member
When will Biden pay for the damages to the victims of the East Palestine disaster?
About the same time when he pays for the disaster in Hawaii, only 700 dollars per household, with the added humiliation of a few billion dollars sent to Ukraine as a comparison. At the end of the day, the people of the USA are cry babies. Sucking it up is ultimately all they can do and no amount of guns will solve anything because they are fundamentally a bunch of cry babies who cry when they try to smack you…. In the ass
 

tygyg1111

Captain
Registered Member
Hahahaha. This Twitter/X post is so bad.

Fundamental problems:

1- China can too.

2- It is very debatable if the UK actually qualifies for this. One of their carriers is absolutely not deployable as of 2023. They have just 32 F-35B. Which is not enough for populating a single QE-Class CV even if you assume 100% availability and leave no aircraft on the shore. And beyond this they have just 6 AAW escorts. Not enough for escorting a single aircraft carrier if you factor in real world availability rates and non-escort duties.

3- India qualifies for this too, if you think the UK does. They have enough escort ships though, unlike the UK.

4- What's the point of this post?
The more pertinent question is: How many nations can deploy 2 strike carriers that simultaneously work?
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
I'll predict that when the US finally accepts that China can make its own advanced semiconductors, they'll offer a deal to China that they will spin as great when it only works for the US. The US will lift sanctions on China buying advance semiconductors, but not the best ones, because the main point is they want China back to buying their semiconductors so their companies can money again. In exchange for that "great" deal, China will have to abide by US sanctions on other countries it doesn't want to get advanced chips, i.e. Russia. Basically the only ones that can buy Chinese semiconductors are China because the US will still impose restrictions on Western companies buying and using them for national security reasons. So in the end the only thing that will have changed is the West gets to make money again on what's going to be a pre-determined number of advanced chips China is expected to buy so the West can make money again.
 
Top