They'd prolly be rainbow-coloured also, just like the sludge oozing out of those tanks and coating the rivers in East Palestine.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Rise of the planet of the bha rats
I interpret this differently. Maybe the Americans have their more capable ATACMs replacement (PrSM) entering service, or at least will be soon but want to keep a low profile. So they can afford to dip into their stocks.
US cannot implement infrastructure projects due to various lobbying and political divisions but this is different. There is ideological cover.
When it has democratic president backing than it will be much easier for Arabs to hire Europeans and others and subcontract work there. Trump can also help but not to this extent. European will always look to bipartisan leadership in US. some leaders consider themselves so full of themselves that they not speak. but dont limit this to Arab-India. Arabs will try integrate the westernized Iranians into it and give some other work who are not. there is alot more to it as it unfolds.
You must be new here. Welcome.
| Iranian President Raisi, during a phone conversation with the Prime Minister of Armenia, following the concentration of Azerbaijani military forces along the border with Armenia:"Any geopolitical change in the border region is a red line for us."
@ResistanceTrench
Media sources close to Turkish security circles claim that Turkish FM Hakan Fidan gave a "serious warning" to Tehran that if Iran intervenes in the Republic of Azerbaijan, the Turkish army will respond to it as soon as possible!
Hahahaha. This Twitter/X post is so bad.
Fundamental problems:
1- China can too.
2- It is very debatable if the UK actually qualifies for this. One of their carriers is absolutely not deployable as of 2023. They have just 32 F-35B. Which is not enough for populating a single QE-Class CV even if you assume 100% availability and leave no aircraft on the shore. And beyond this they have just 6 AAW escorts. Not enough for escorting a single aircraft carrier if you factor in real world availability rates and non-escort duties.
3- India qualifies for this too, if you think the UK does. They have enough escort ships though, unlike the UK.
4- What's the point of this post?
Fundamental problems:
1- China can too.
2- It is very debatable if the UK actually qualifies for this. One of their carriers is absolutely not deployable as of 2023. They have just 32 F-35B. Which is not enough for populating a single QE-Class CV even if you assume 100% availability and leave no aircraft on the shore. And beyond this they have just 6 AAW escorts. Not enough for escorting a single aircraft carrier if you factor in real world availability rates and non-escort duties.
3- India qualifies for this too, if you think the UK does. They have enough escort ships though, unlike the UK.
4- What's the point of this post?
Why?