Statement straight out of the CIA's playbook
Another successful CIA operation
Not again. You guys said the same thing about Thailand just a few months ago… What’s with a little patience?
Statement straight out of the CIA's playbook
Another successful CIA operation
Remember Bolsonaro tooNot again. You guys said the same thing about Thailand just a few months ago… What’s with a little patience?
Another rumor based article. Might be true but has no news value as of now.
That twitter quote they dropped is a good sign. Generally when they make comparisons between China and fictional novels, the opposite happens.Another rumor based article. Might be true but has no news value as of now.
The CIA funding must be pouring-in!Greasy haired Argentinian continues to bark. Polls predict he will win the 2nd round convincingly.
“Not only am I not going to do business with China, I am not going to do business with any communists. I am a defender of freedom, peace and democracy. The communists don’t go there. The Chinese don’t go in there. Putin doesn’t go in there. Lula doesn’t go in there. We want to be the moral lighthouse of the continent. We want to be defenders of freedom, democracy, diversity. Of peace,” stated the national deputy.
That is why admitting Argentina into BRICS was a dumb move. Should have waited for the outcome of the election to be determined.
What would he do anyways? Leave BRICS, which his country more or less begged to join? So the status quo before him returns?Greasy haired Argentinian continues to bark. Polls predict he will win the 2nd round convincingly.
“Not only am I not going to do business with China, I am not going to do business with any communists. I am a defender of freedom, peace and democracy. The communists don’t go there. The Chinese don’t go in there. Putin doesn’t go in there. Lula doesn’t go in there. We want to be the moral lighthouse of the continent. We want to be defenders of freedom, democracy, diversity. Of peace,” stated the national deputy.
That is why admitting Argentina into BRICS was a dumb move. Should have waited for the outcome of the election to be determined.
Nope!My old comments about a possible Mexico expedition aged too well for my comfort. I saw a lot of Republican politicians writing about it and getting a lot of engagement. Big name media and politicians capitalized further on the topic and bingo. Half of the Americans now support such a thing in less than two years.
These cartels and even the Mexican state can not harm the US military meaningfully. The US got quite good at remaining in places despite armed hostility and dispatching small militaries.
Other than that this thing would be a dumpster fire. If the US actually wants to end the cartel problem, it has to really occupy the country. I mean soldiers on even obscure rural roads similar to post WW2 occupations. Just taking the cities and occasional patrols to the countryside is never enough for killing insurgencies. And Mexico is bigger than Afghanistan, both by population and landmass. Such an occupation would be horribly expensive, or just a bit less expensive and ineffective.
Moreover, these cartels have a lot of collaborators and presence in the US, including in the politics. It is how they can make billions in the first place. And a lot of latinos in the US still have ties to Mexico including family members. Riots, assassinations, infrastructure sabotages and attacks to police stations would go non-stop.
Not enough? These two countries have a long border. What does that mean? Refugees. Cartel members will cross as refugees and commit terrorist acts on top of usual problems associated with mass refugee flows.
With the Cyberpunk expac just around the corner, all I would say is: Do it.My old comments about a possible Mexico expedition aged too well for my comfort. I saw a lot of Republican politicians writing about it and getting a lot of engagement. Big name media and politicians capitalized further on the topic and bingo. Half of the Americans now support such a thing in less than two years.
These cartels and even the Mexican state can not harm the US military meaningfully. The US got quite good at remaining in places despite armed hostility and dispatching small militaries.
Other than that this thing would be a dumpster fire. If the US actually wants to end the cartel problem, it has to really occupy the country. I mean soldiers on even obscure rural roads similar to post WW2 occupations. Just taking the cities and occasional patrols to the countryside is never enough for killing insurgencies. And Mexico is bigger than Afghanistan, both by population and landmass. Such an occupation would be horribly expensive, or just a bit less expensive and ineffective.
Moreover, these cartels have a lot of collaborators and presence in the US, including in the politics. It is how they can make billions in the first place. And a lot of latinos in the US still have ties to Mexico including family members. Riots, assassinations, infrastructure sabotages and attacks to police stations would go non-stop.
Not enough? These two countries have a long border. What does that mean? Refugees. Cartel members will cross as refugees and commit terrorist acts on top of usual problems associated with mass refugee flows.
By 2077, the NUSA was the 24th largest economy in the world, and held only a sliver of its former influence in international affairs.
Nope!
Cartels and insurgents are motivated differently; cartels by money and insurgents by ideology. Once the money stops flowing, the cartels lose their power and influence. A campaign against them need focus, simply, on halting their cash-flow while hitting at the cartel leadership. A drone-based surveillance and strike campaign would be sufficient to achieve the latter element of this strategy. The former element would be the most difficult as the manufacturing and distribution points are more spatially diversified than the leadership.
Criminals are always easier to contend against than are zealots; criminals are motivated by greed, zealots by their version of “truth”! The only reason that the cartels are still in business is because, to some degree, they serve the interests of the U. S. ”Shadow Government”, as they have since the Reagan administration, at least.