Miscellaneous News

coolgod

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Blinken to be in Beijing for talks on June 18​



WASHINGTON, June 9 (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken will travel to China next week for long-delayed talks aimed at stabilizing tense relations, and a U.S. official said he is expected to be there on June 18.

Reuters
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that Blinken would travel to China in the coming weeks, citing an official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

An official on Friday said Blinken would be in Beijing on June 18, but gave no other details.

Is it too late to launch a "Spy" Balloon from China and have it over Continental US before the 18th? :p
 

victoon

Junior Member
Registered Member
Ferguson is right acknowledge the strength of China vs the former soviet union and the US not having the cohesion it had during the cold war. But I disagree with the west's chance in cold war 2 because I think China has been doring a great job connecting and developing the south.
His thoughts on AI vs internet was informative to me.
 

sndef888

Senior Member
Registered Member
Current Yoon administration is probably the most retarded South Korean government for sometime. Even though ultra-nationalism has been dominated South Korean politics for a long time, most of the time South Korean government tended to be pragmatic. However, Yoon administration anti-China and pro-Japan policies have been crystal clear from the get-go. But Yoon has the illusion that he can still extract goodies from China and fool China, and China shouldn't and can't object to his anti-China policies.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
They're lashing out because China is destroying their economy. Almost every product that South Korean economy is dependent on, China is doing better and cheaper.

China should continue stonewalling South Korea and let them 自生自灭. Let's see how much longer they can afford to act tough
 

56860

Senior Member
Registered Member
Ferguson is right acknowledge the strength of China vs the former soviet union and the US not having the cohesion it had during the cold war. But I disagree with the west's chance in cold war 2 because I think China has been doring a great job connecting and developing the south.
His thoughts on AI vs internet was informative to me.
China is nothing like the Soviet Union. China is far more ingrained in global trade than the USSR ever was. That in itself already makes it a more formidable opponent. China has succeeded in continuously improving the quality of life for its citizens. The USSR by in large did not. Chinese products compete successfully and in many industries, dominate international markets. USSR products were never competitive in international markets.
 

muddie

Junior Member
Ferguson is right acknowledge the strength of China vs the former soviet union and the US not having the cohesion it had during the cold war. But I disagree with the west's chance in cold war 2 because I think China has been doring a great job connecting and developing the south.
His thoughts on AI vs internet was informative to me.
Dalio is a big proponent of having U.S. and China working together. He also implies in prior interviews that the U.S. should not try to stop China from developing or obtaining advanced tech.

This will never happen because once China does catch up fully to the U.S. in tech (especially if unchecked), it will fly past the U.S. and naturally dominate the entire market. This is just a function of China's size and scale, rather than Chinese politicians purposely trying to displace the U.S. to become the next hegemon.
 

Chish

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
In these military drills, the participating countries are more interested in assessing each other military strength than any actual threats from China. Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore have a long history of military distrust among themselves, with occasional localised hostile acts dating back to the Lee Kwan Yew, Sukarno and pre Mahathir era.
Mahathir even said that Singapore should be returned to Johore.
 
Last edited:

56860

Senior Member
Registered Member
In these military drills, the participating countries are more interested in assessing each other military strength than any actual threats from China. Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore have a long history of military distrust among themselves, with occasional localised hostile acts dating back to the Lee Kwan Yew, Mahathir and Sukarno era.
Singapore's oversized military - for a country of its size and population - is a direct result of fears of Malaysian and Indonesian domination. Malaysia and Mahathir (just die already you relic) is the reason why I had to waste two years of my life shitting in a jungle. There is no sense of brotherhood or cultural affinity in ASEAN. It's a formal acknowledgement that since we will always be next to each other, it's better to put aside differences, sit down, break bread and get rich rather than start wars.
 
Top