And yet they're a dying breed, with 187 left, the US should put them in engendered list.Come on, 100% kill rate and 0% lost in combat, a perfect record, what not to like.
And yet they're a dying breed, with 187 left, the US should put them in engendered list.Come on, 100% kill rate and 0% lost in combat, a perfect record, what not to like.
The US is turning into a satirical sitcom who’s writers fear they are about to be cancelled so keep jumping the shark with more and more outrageously ridiculous plotlines.This guy seems adamant the second recorded kill of the F-22 was a US National Weather Service balloon.
With just 6 destroyers and 48 carrier aircraft they aren't capable of arming and escorting a single carrier reliably anyway. They have to operate it below its capabilities or offshore those tasks to Americans. This is why their so publicised trip to SCS involved American aircraft, a Burke and a Dutch DZP-class destroyer. Just like the French, they sometimes train carrier personnel using USN carriers too. So please don't talk to me about global capabilities of French and British navies. Both are pretenders.Cancelling, mothballing or selling POW was one of the options considered under the 2010 SDSR i.e. the UK's GFC-era defence review. It was rejected then and it is difficult to imagine that it would be accepted now.
That such a notion is even put forward for consideration, however, indicates the kind of gap that exists between Britain's vision for its armed forces and the reality.
They could just use it as an oversized royal yacht. Would be more financially sound at this point than whatever BoJo was proposing back in 2021.Cancelling, mothballing or selling POW was one of the options considered under the 2010 SDSR i.e. the UK's GFC-era defence review. It was rejected then and it is difficult to imagine that it would be accepted now.
That such a notion is even put forward for consideration, however, indicates the kind of gap that exists between Britain's vision for its armed forces and the reality.
already reported, I have some small doubts, but if true, this would mean that China needs alot more of these types of loitering munitions. It would also be good as a model for a PLA optimized version.
Wake me up when that manage to down a j20 because shooting a slow moving target mid air doesn’t seem to be worth all the training that these pilots are givenCome on, 100% kill rate and 0% lost in combat, a perfect record, what not to like.
Are there even 90 countries that have air forces? This sounds like a brag. No offense to the Iranian defense industry but what special ingredient is there in the Iranian suicide drone (which is very effective by the way) that China doesn’t have?
The fuselage — similar to Harpy, which China a has acquired in the 90s.
Motor — MD-550 engine, which based on Limbach, now a Chinese company.
Electronics — off the shelf components by Western firms, which are available in exponentially larger quantities in China.
Economy of scale — don’t make me laugh.
I think our Iranian friends are using it as a flex, ie look we are together also with another yankee adversary. At the most the Chinese may have bought a small batch to see its effectiveness is as reported.
From what I know there will be a highly detailed and comprehensive report about all the weapons and tactics employed by all sides in this war, it is the Chinese way.
15,000 drones is not a small batch.
15,000 drones is not a small batch.