Miscellaneous News

Andy1974

Senior Member
Registered Member
It would have been more factually accurate to flip the scales in terms of the size of the money bag(s) paid and the amount of arms received in return since Taiwan has always paid way above market rates for US arms.
Many of their graphics leave a lot to be desired, I see mistakes or missed opportunities in almost all of them. I hope they can improve this, they are trying to get these to go viral.
 

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

On Friday, the first eight China-bound Russian trucks from the Gazprom Helium Service fleet, powered by liquefied natural gas, crossed the bridge via the Kani-Kurgan-Heihe checkpoint. From the Chinese side, eight trucks with car tires and components for electrical equipment set off for Russia.

I am sure that the opening of the bridge will reduce the costs and terms of transportation of goods in foreign trade,” said Vitaly Savelyev, head of the Russian Transport Ministry.

He added that the new crossing would allow cargo turnover between the two countries to reach up to 1 million tons per year.
 

badoc

Junior Member
Registered Member
US imported a lot of Chinese goods too. But it does not give US the right to threaten China's security and interfere with China's internal policy.

Same applies to Singapore. Singapore has the right to ensure her won security. But in doing so, it does not confer to Singapore the right to compromise another country's own security, especially when that country does nothing to threaten Singapore.

Besides, China has been the number one market for Singapore export. So it is a mutually beneficial economic relationship and not a one sided affair in which Singapore investment is out of the goodness of Singapore's heart.

P.S. We are discussing Singapore's government policy and not about Singaporeans, who, from my understanding, have much more limited say on foreign policies than internal ones.
This is the second time you post this crab.
I will try to give a more detailed reply, hopefully my last on this.

The US and Australia had a military base in Singapore since after the UK vacated from Singapore.
Also little known is a "reluctant to leave" Malaysian Navy finally left their Singapore base after we increased their rent massively in 1997.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Tiny Singapore needed defence agreements due to hostile neighbors wanting to swallow us up.
Konfrontasi, when Indonesia invaded Singapore in 1963-1966.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In 1971, Communist China was considered a threat to our region, with no diplomatic relations with any South East Asian nation.
Only Singapore was friendly, and we acted as the middleman, re-exporting Chinese goods to the region and facilitating diplomatic relations between Asean and China.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
"
Lee Kuan Yew, the first Prime Minister of Singapore was very careful to avoid giving any impression to the other countries in Southeast Asia that Singapore, three-quarters ethnic Chinese, was a "Third China" (the first two being the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China). This was due to Singapore's experience with communists, the backdrop of the ongoing Vietnam War, as well as domestic political considerations.
As a result, Singapore did not establish diplomatic relations with China until the other countries in Southeast Asia had decided they wanted to do so, to avoid portraying a pro-China bias. His official visits to China starting in 1976 were conducted in English, to assure other Southeast Asian countries that he represented Singapore, and not a "Third China".

Singapore was the last country in Southeast Asia to formally recognize the People's Republic of China. "

In other words, WE HAD TO SHOW(/pretend) WE ARE NOT PRO-CHINA to survive in our hostile region. Apparently the leadership in China understands our predicament, maybe not their netizens and yourself.

nb. Even without diplomatic relations, ethnic Chinese Singaporeans were able to visit China fuss free.
.
 
Last edited:

Tse

Junior Member
Registered Member
US imported a lot of Chinese goods too. But it does not give US the right to threaten China's security and interfere with China's internal policy.

Same applies to Singapore. Singapore has the right to ensure her won security. But in doing so, it does not confer to Singapore the right to compromise another country's own security, especially when that country does nothing to threaten Singapore.

Besides, China has been the number one market for Singapore export. So it is a mutually beneficial economic relationship and not a one sided affair in which Singapore investment is out of the goodness of Singapore's heart.

P.S. We are discussing Singapore's government policy and not about Singaporeans, who, from my understanding, have much more limited say on foreign policies than internal ones.
Ok I suppose I didn't make it blunt enough. Singapore is an occupied country. The present ruling party gained power by openly saying that if the anti-western Socialist Front won the 1963 election, the British-backed Malaysians will invade. Which was likely true. The deSinicization of Singapore was partly accomplished because of the real fear of Malaysia and Indonesian constantly threatening about Singapore's minority rights. The government is pretty much held hostage by the colour revolution threat, which the US saw fit to remind Singapore about during the Hendrickson Affair of 1988 when the US envoy just went around rallying opposition leaders. Not that Singapore did not profit; it did profit a lot from America's Vietnamese black hole. But let's not pretend that either the Singapore government or people can really make a reasonable difference if they changed foreign policy, without getting colour revolutioned and then nothing changes.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Uncle Sam isn't going to be happy with this
@ansy1968
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Marcos expressed his belief that it is "the partnerships and alliances that we as a country will make with our friends and allies and partners around the world that will keep the stability of our economic recovery."

"And I think that, again, the synergy that will come from that cooperation is what I believe will bring us forward to a bright future," he stressed.
Come to the day that we can say that... we are beyond the pandemic crisis, we are beyond the economic crisis brought on by the pandemic. We can only do it, certainly, in the Philippines, with our partners.
And our strongest partner has always been, in that regard, our close neighbor and our good friend, the People's Republic of China," Marcos said.
He noted that the "long-standing, friendly relationship" between the Philippines and China has greatly benefited the people of the two countries and that both the diplomatic relations and fruitful cooperation between the two nations will continue to scale new heights.
The relationship between the Philippines and China is a very important relationship that we should continue to evolve as the years go by and as the changes that we have seen around the world are affecting our own status within the region," Marcos said.
"With that cooperation and with that communication, I think we have been able to find a way to grow and to strengthen the relationships between our two countries," he added.
Marcos pointed out that he sees the future of China and the Philippines developing in many ways that many people do not see now.
"I will encourage our relationship to not only be in the very strict and formal senses of business or government-to-government or public-private partnerships — all of those we will encourage," he said. "But I learned a term in one of the conferences I was invited to in China and it is a good term because I believe presents for us another opportunity to grow closer and that term that I learned from the Chinese is people to people," he said
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Good. About time we had a clear communication about the consequences of supporting Taiwan's independence

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Beijing will "not hesitate to start a war" if Taiwan declares independence, China's defence minister warned his US counterpart Friday
Wei warned Austin that "if anyone dares to split Taiwan from China, the Chinese army will definitely not hesitate to start a war no matter the cost", defence ministry spokesman Wu Qian quoted the minister as saying during the meeting.
The Chinese minister vowed that Beijing would "smash to smithereens any 'Taiwan independence' plot and resolutely uphold the unification of the motherland", according to the Chinese defence ministry.
He "stressed that Taiwan is China's Taiwan... Using Taiwan to contain China will never prevail", the ministry said.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member

A few comments:

The CSIS host seems to think China misplayed Hong Kong and the SCS islands.

But he seems to have forgotten that it was Hillary Clinton "refreshed her memory" of a meeting (as per Geoff Dyer's book - The Contest of the Century) and announced to the world media that the SCS was now a core Chinese interest along the lines of Taiwan or Tibet. Clinton was right that China would have no choice but to embrace her announcement. But she was wrong that China would have no response and that the SCS nations would flock to the US for protection. Instead, China built the huge SCS island bases, which demonstrated US impotence. At the same time, these Chinese bases would be used to keep the sea lanes open for the countries adjoining the SCS in the event of the US trying to blockade China.

Plus was it ever realistic that the CCP would also the protestors to potentially vote in a pro-independence Chief Executive? And we saw the CCP be remarkably restrained in not sending in the Army and allowing the Hong Kong Police to deal with it, even though it lasted months.

Plus the overall US strategy seems to be to wait out China until it mellows. That's not a bad strategy as the current generation in charge will be replaced in the decades ahead with the 80s generation and then the millenials.
 

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China's high-speed rail network hits 40,000-km mark in 2021 amid push for transportation power

China's high-speed rail network hit the 40,000-kilometer mark by the end of 2021, reaching out to 93 percent of domestic cities with a population of over 500,000, An Lusheng, deputy head of National Railway Administration, said on Friday. This comes as the country ramps up a push to build itself into a transportation power.

As of the end of last year, the country's railways that had been operational totaled 150,000 kilometers, including the 40,000 kilometers of high-speed rails, An told a press conference that summed up stellar headway the country has made in revving up its transpiration prowess since the Party's 18th National Congress in 2012.

The enormous railway network covers 81 percent of the country's counties while high-speed rails have been accessible to domestic cities with population of over 500,000.
Last year, the average daily number of ships entering and leaving domestic ports exceeded 69,000, and about 26,800 flights took off and landed every day across the country. In addition, the country's courier sector handled nearly 300 million parcels on a daily basis, according to Xu.

Wow those daily numbers are huge. 26,800 flights of takeoffs/landings, 69,000 ships enter/exiting ports, and 300 million parcels.
 
Top