guerilla war?? Taiwan is only 6% of Ukraine. The only good thing is 75% of Taiwan is mountain.If the US was preparing to defend Taiwan, they wouldn't be trying to get Taiwan to fight a guerilla war.
guerilla war?? Taiwan is only 6% of Ukraine. The only good thing is 75% of Taiwan is mountain.If the US was preparing to defend Taiwan, they wouldn't be trying to get Taiwan to fight a guerilla war.
To the West, Russia might as well be a vassal of China at this point. So they're not wrong...SDF : Can China prevail in the Taiwan strait?
Media :
SDF is too pessimistic sometimes /s
SDF : Can China prevail in the Taiwan strait?
Media :
SDF is too pessimistic sometimes /s
You're right that it might happen, but the most likely scenario is Russia and NATO destroying each other's assets and bombing their territory, and eventually escalating to a nuclear exchange without intervention from third-party, if NATO decides to do a military mobilization within Ukraine. It would likely prompt neutral countries composed of many countries including China to press for negotiations between both sides to deescalate, making joint statements in UN.People laugh, but I think that’s not as remote a possibility as most people might think.
For example, if NATO directly entered the war in Ukraine and started to roll back the Russians, I think China will enter the war as well on Russia’s side much like Korea. Because the alternative is nuclear war, which can escalate to total planetary MAD incredibly quickly. When you have no good options, you choose the one that’s least bad, and fighting NATO in Ukraine is infinitely better than nuclear planetary MAD.
No need to distrust. When it comes to China, there exists unanimous consensus amongst major parties & the military establishment that China is critical to the Nations existence.
I can assure you, it's because of Biden's 8000-year old brain and proclivity for gaffes.This thing is going to a dangerous place. Biden nowadays says stup*d things everywhere all the way to calling other presidents with wrong names. But this is serious stuff. The end of ambiguity may trigger extreme reactions from China. I hope I am wrong but we may watch a Ukraine 2 before 2025. China at the gov level probably sees the economy as something that can be built later. The CPC may very well decide Taiwan is inducing too much uncertainty in China's future and that conquering it is the best course. If Biden doesn't walk back from this like it did the previous time China would challenge this soon.
Edit: Turns out they had already done:
Strategic ambiguity is about under what conditions the US would intervene in a war over Taiwan, not a refusal to answer if it would intervene.Already walked back but strategic ambiguity no longer exists. Let's not kid ourselves