Miscellaneous News

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Western elites are such hypocrites; all they believe in is power. From European Christian monks hypocritically breaking their commandment against stealing with the theft of Chinese silkworms to current Europeans blithely ignoring their supposed liberal democratic screed that innovation could only come from democracy by trying to steal Chinese EV tech, it is clear that the the role of a nemesis like China is sorely needed by the world. China is like the anti West- secular, rational, pragmatic and infinitely more compassionate and humane- just compare societal norms and the role of government towards the people.

Fun fact, when the first penal colony of Australia was set up, many convicts both men and women tried to flee north to China because they saw China much as the west is now starting to see China, remember this was before the opium wars as well.


why Japan despite wanting to commit seppuku by PLA still relies on Chinese rare earths
After getting an early taste of the REE card in the early 2010s Japan worked very hard to not totally depends on China to source their REE. The result of such effort is today Japan "only" imports 60% of its required REE from China, of which the heavy REE 100% of the import comes from China.

So that should give you some rough idea how US effort into developing their own REE industry will go.
 

A potato

Junior Member
Registered Member
Not really "molding," or at least not in the sense that one might use the word to describe Indian attempts to build a cohesive identity.

Most of the "molding" happened ~3000 years ago during the expansion of the Zhou dynasty's feudal system, which brought a large region under the same cultural umbrella. Confucius came along ~500 years later and introduced the basis of a 'formal' system based on that cultural umbrella, which would be built on and go on to become official state philosophy another ~500 years later, which is around the time it really became a formal system that would carry on officially for ~2000 years until quite recently. Notably, it was formalized as the method of selection of government officials about ~500 years in during the Sui dynasty and solidified by the succeeding Tang. Confucianism is no longer official government policy or doctrine in any way, but the impact on Chinese culture is quite profound, considering that it's had two thousand years to marinate.

So it's not really "molding several ethnic groups into one identity," because by any real measurement those "several ethnic groups" are really a single group, have spoken the same language (mutually intelligible since at least the Zhou dynasty), written the same language (mutually legible since at least the Zhou, exactly the same since standardization by Qin ~2200 years ago) and shared the same cultural values (since at least early Zhou ~3000 years ago, greatly strengthened during Han ~200 years ago and by succeeding dynasties).

Of course, there have been small tribes throughout history in the past ~3000 years that assimilate, but that's not "molding."
Plus India is uniting a bunch of Indo Europeans and Dravidians into one identity which has somewhat failed due to southern india aka the dravidian part resenting the north aka the Indo European parts.

China on the other had has been and always was a union of Sino Tibetan People after all both Yan and Huang were Sino tibetan tribes with Yi and Ancient Qiangs (Who would become Tibetans) joining later.
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member

lol getting real personal, I wonder if this was how the Xiongnu felt once the Han Dynasty made clear it was prepared to go to war. All that’s left now is for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to declare that the PRC is simply restoring the Mandate of Heaven against barbarians, real Han Wudi time.


…and there it is, RIP American democracy, say hello to another thousand year Reich.
1760572505562.jpeg
 

supercat

Colonel
After what Netherlands did? Also dont they have their own IPs?

Also if EU really cut itself off w CN, wont they be more vulnerable, less leverage w US and less interest from CN w regards w Russia Ukr?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Which Chinese company in their right mind will invest in EU after the fiasco of Nexperia? The Dutch government, as a good minion of the US regime, seized Nexperia in direct response to America's 50% rule, which was officially released on September 29th. The claim by Loek van Kooten that the Dutch government took over Nexperia because Wingtech perpetrated financial misconduct is just gaslighting.

The EU only has themselves to blame for the drop in exports to Russia, because they are the ones that are sanctioning Russia.

Robin Brooks is at it again.
I'm all for contrarian views but to claim that "exporters are hurting" as the core reason when Chinese exports are at an all-time high is multi-dimensional logic that apparently I am unfortunately too unsophisticated to appreciate.
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Which Chinese company in their right mind will invest in EU after the fiasco of Nexperia? The Dutch government, as a good minion of the US regime, seized Nexperia in direct response to America's 50% rule, which was officially released on September 29th. The claim by Loek van Kooten that the Dutch government took over Nexperia because Wingtech perpetrated financial misconduct is just gaslighting.
TFW the Dutch made the EU as investable as India.
 

_killuminati_

Senior Member
Registered Member
Plus India is uniting a bunch of Indo Europeans and Dravidians into one identity which has somewhat failed due to southern india aka the dravidian part resenting the north aka the Indo European parts.
That is news to me that it is uniting? On the contrary, it is dividing and always has been especially due to the Hindu caste system. In India (and Pakistan), people associate with clans and tribes which number in the thousands. In India (but not Pakistan), due to Hinduism, the clans are categorized into castes, and that concept isn't going away; rather, it is part of the Constitution (i.e. "Scheduled Castes"). There isn't any single identity.
The Indo-E̶u̶r̶o̶p̶e̶a̶n̶-Iranian tribes are more concentrated in Pakistan.
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
no, Khan is the title of ruler in Mongolic and Turkic languages which are not related to Mandarian language (a branch of Sino-Tibetan).

Han is a name of river in Southwest China. It is a tributary water of Yantze River in Southern China. The founder of Han dynasty Liu Bang received his fiefdom in the Han river vally in Southwest China (today's Sichuan province). After he defeated everyone he named his dynasty Han, a tradition of naming by ariscratical title. The population would not be named Han as there is no reason to call your own name. People would self introduce as Zhongyuan Ren (people from central plain), or Lingnan Ren (people from morden day Guangdong) and so on. Only in Yuan dynasty, the mongol emperor need a catagorization for official assignment based on the time of joining Chengis Khan's struggle, they made four catagories under their rule, and Han was used officially for the first time to refer to a population.

In short, Han is name of a river to name of a dynasty to name of people.

Interestingly in most European languages, the word like Chin, Sinea, China, Kina are the name of first dynasy before Han. But inside China the dynasty lasted for very short time, so the name did not stick around as Han would.
I thought 唐太宗 got the title of Great Khan after he defeated the nomads.
 
Top