They
He doesn't know this? Why is he complaining then?
As I said - not the sharpest tool in the shed.
Regarding Pegasus -
I've selected Indian news reports Itself. And Hindu, Business Standard, The print included
They are using the wire as a source
According to a report in The Wire, which is part of the consortium, the numbers of several Tibetan officials, activists and monks were marked for potential surveillance from 2017 to 2019.
3 of the articles you used in your screenshot use the wires conjecture as evidence pls bring me substantial proof
Again this is what is being said in the article
The presence of a number on the list doesn’t convey that it was necessarily targeted with Pegasus spyware, only that these were persons of interest for potential surveillance, the Pegasus Project has said.
The NSO Group, which owns Pegasus and claims to only deal with governments as clients, has denied any link between these numbers and surveillance attempts.
He noted that the publisher of the reports has pointed out that it cannot say if the numbers in the list were under surveillance, and the company whose technology was allegedly used has “denied these claims outrightly”.
Quoting the NSO Group, which owns Pegasus, he said: “NSO Group believes that claims that you have been provided with, are based on misleading interpretation of leaked data from basic information, such as HLR (Home Location Register, which provides permanent subscriber information of a mobile network) Lookup services, which have no bearing on the list of the customers’ targets of Pegasus or any other NSO products. Such services are openly available to anyone, anywhere, and anytime, and are commonly used by governmental agencies as well as by private companies worldwide.
“It is also beyond dispute that the data has nothing to do with surveillance or with NSO, so there can be no factual basis to suggest that a use of the data somehow equates to surveillance”.
Where is the proof solid concrete evidence in the court of law
Innocent until proven guilty
