My apologies, you can remove it from here please. It was just to find out whether that post will be taken constructively or will be debunked. Regarding Ladakh, most westerners will not like to see a war in that region . Most posts currently in different websites here are just reporting what we get from Chinese or Indian outlets. They have not taken a stand. The last one is here:-
Sikkim: Chinese and Indian troops 'in new border clash'
Question:- what is Jai hind?
Bhakt - a term coined for some who sees India through a prism of religio-cultural tint, besides showing unapologetic commitment to India (a Hindu country for them) also exhibit cultural, religious and ethnic bigotry for others. They also are nazi sympathizers as they believe they are the true "Aryans" that nazis tried to borrow their ideology from. They believe white races are culturally corrupt while being equal racially but all other races are inferior or subpar while they alone are the superior in a holistic manner.
Jai Hind - less "nazi" compared to a bhakt but unapologetically jingoist. Often also a bigot against Chinese race and other races. Belive that all problems in the past stems purely due to Chinese and Pakistani actions and there are no faults with India. A right wing Indian nationalist to be precise.
Regarding Sikkim -
Sikkim used to be an independent nation with a king. Similar to Bhutan.
Sikkim was conquered /annexed into India. Just like Ladakh, the borders of Sikkim wasn't clearly demarcated. China is suspicious that India will try to annex Bhutan and Nepal if given the chance.
To India, Tibet ought to be independent and India believes that China wants to take over Nepal and Bhutan.
You get the idea.
