Actually no.
The Romans nearly fell to the Huns and later fell to the Visigoths. The Byzantines fell to the Arabs in Syria and later the Turks in
the 15th Century.
The Hindu kingdom of Sindh was very advanced as a civilization but was defeated by the Arabs.
A civilization to survive has to be advanced militarily and organizationally not merely in economy and culture.
.
The Europeans lost in China and at one time for 100 years they had all the bullets.
Ya.
We don't need to get that far.
US lost to talibans despite having 5th generation stealth fighters. Been 2 decades in Iraq. A bit too long for their own liking.
Both of us can turn & twist the reasoning to suit our narratives that will lead to nowhere.
Human consider them to be advanced, yet the ancient billions of years of old planet call earth revolutes at least 3.5 times faster than fastest thing advanced human race produced till date. This is an strange universe full of wisdom.
The Hindu kingdom of Sindh was very advanced as a civilization but was defeated by the Arabs.
Advanced in what? Indians still fetishize about being better swordsman( i am being serious) than japanese samurai in era of AI when they couldn't do it thousands of years ago in iron age.
The Europeans lost in China and at one time for 100 years they had all the bullets.
Yep. If only they could get through Himalaya from the other side where they came, they could have brought enough bullets with them.
This is same exact reason why after WW2, only US infrastructure left standing.
If you look at Dubai it is significantly controlled by an expat Hindu business and labor population.
Ya.
I have a factory where all of the workers are indians. They can go to strike & leverage the threat of loss for their own profit.
However, i am still the owner & provider.
Indians have been trying to leverage their "huge IT industry potential" threat everywhere. That's why they have never been able to present themselves as strategic threat.
A civilization to survive has to be advanced militarily and organizationally not merely in economy and culture.
Absolutely correct.
Here is the contradiction in your statement. You started the conversation saying someone leveraging the "migrant power" to set up lobby that can influence government.
1. If your argument is - A civilization to survive has to be advanced militarily and organizationally not merely in economy and culture.
Then - You can't do it through lobbying. You do lobbying to a much greater power for assistance. Indian lobby power extends only to whining about their neighbors on the other side not to sell F16s.
Being advanced militarily & organizationally =/= well organized in lobbying.
It's a mathematical impossibility.
2. If your argument is that, there are incidents that migrant powers resulted into much bigger power, You need advanced tactics & organization for that
well in advance.
Here the numbers of manpower & superior tactics offset the advantage your opponent can have in other way.. Turks who defeated Byzantine resulted into ottoman empire.
Arabs who defeated eastern empires ruled half of the world, probably one of those empires who came closer to British empire.
You can't take parts of two completely different scenario which are fundamentally different from each other & then mishmash them to create a third fantasy scenario.
You can point to Israel. You need to understand something, Israel acknowledges their weakness & has been backed by much bigger powers throughout. India is of 1.3 billion, if they want to be Israel they have to bow before someone else first.
There is a reason why India/ or it's previous existential references has never been able to win conflict of their own. Just because the reason you have mentioned. They are good at lobbying.
This is going way off topic. I think it would be better to avoid discussing indian non-existent fantasy scenarios which will keep going off topic.
Trust me, we have heard fair share of those.
Determining probable scenarios based on fantasy is an impossibility.
