J-35A fighter (PLAAF) + FC-31 thread

sunnymaxi

Major
Registered Member
Because the West keeps China's COMAC from entering their market to compete by not certifying the plane.
this is not the problem. domestic market is more than enough for COMAC to become globally competitive.

civil aviation is the hardest and most technological advanced industry. millions of components/parts with different precision level.. but fortunately China has industrial depth , resource and talent. and China just overcome the technical barrier. means their journey just started.

COMAC announced to invest 10 Billion RMB in R&D annually for next three years.

on 25th June, 12 largest National strategic investment groups invested Multi Billions in AECC Shanghai. they specifically mentioned civil large turbofan Engines.. this is the single largest known investment in any Turbofan Engine company in modern era.
 

tphuang

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
I think it's important to just explain how big this investment from SAC is.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Guangwei is a major supplier of carbon fiber for AVIC aviation High Tech (中航高科), who suppliers all the military aircraft and COMAC with carbon fiber prepreg, resin based composite material they need. It has 60% of China's military aviation composite material market. Its 2024 income is 5B RMB.
Guangwei's 2024 income is 2.45B RMB.

According to SAC's own poster, it expects to invest 2.7B RMB and get 5B RMB of production value every year.

So I think SAC's composite processing center is going to produce some very advanced material, probably with high end (maybe T1000/T1100 input) and the aircraft it produces are going to significant increase their composite usage. It says next-generation military aircraft. So that would include J35, J-XDS and high end drones. CFRP is likely not going to be the only composite they produce, but my guess is vast majority of value produced will be CFRP.
 

Harry Kane

New Member
Registered Member
Self-explanatory.

54641967697_c9f402794b_o.jpg
Not sure if this has been discussed before, but why is the radome so concealed on this jet? Its barely noticeable on 61820 and pretty much invisible on 61821.
 

tamsen_ikard

Senior Member
Registered Member
This is unprecedented.

Serial production of the J-XDS won't begin until the early, if not the mid 2030s, which means CATIC must be projecting a torrent of J-35 export orders given what SAC and other AVIC subsidiaries/affiliates are likely spending in totality on CAPEX to construct this aerospace city, which is by no means a misleading name given the footprint.

AVIC most likely expect the J-35 to become the MiG-21 of its generation in terms of global proliferation, and TBF, it's a reasonable outlook.

The alternatives are either immature (e.g. Su-57), or subject to the terms and conditions (and whims) of US foreign policy (e.g. F-35, KF-21). Moreover, the amount of production capacity that's visibly in play imply economies of scale that should make the J-35 highly competitive in terms of pricing, on top of capabilities and politics, against both Western and non-Western alternatives.



You're very much on target, but it's more than just accountability, it's legitimacy.

Weapons systems like the J-35/A empower Chinese sovereignty in a world where vassalhood under Washington with Trump at its helm is increasingly undignified and untenable, in terms of domestic politics, everywhere from
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

For Beijing, sovereignty translates to national dignity and political legitimacy before domestic constituents.

Likewise, (would be) foreign buyers of the J-35/A recognize that they're paying for sovereignty, as much as they're paying for a stealthy airframe, if not even more so.

I suspect one reason why CCTV is unusually transparent about the J-35/A is because the anchor export customer is paying extra for local assembly to not only maximize sovereign use of their J-35 derivative, but also to enhance regime legitimacy before domestic constituents. However, local assembly will inevitably make it even harder to preserve the J-35's "secrets," so might as well as be transparent.



I get where you're coming from. There's absolutely value to disinformation, especially if you're fighting a hybrid or cold war, and TBH, that's where the US and China are headed, assuming they're not there already.

However, when it comes to industrial capacity, there's no need for China to make any effort in projecting strength, especially when the US government will take care of it themselves. Case in point:

View attachment 155919
Mass export of J-35 is a pipe dream. Too much politics involved which will prevent most countries from buying fighter jets from China.

Only Pakistan is guaranteed to buy it. But I doubt anyone else will buy it. Gulf Arabs can't make US angry. China will not sell to Iran. Asean will also not buy to maintain their neutral stance between US and China. Africa too poor. Latin America again will not make US angry.

China needs major revision of its foreign policy and establish its own China camp before countries will buy such advanced weapons from China.

China already had advanced naval ships and advanced missiles, yet not many countries buy those things. The only weapons China sells are mainly land systems to African countries.

Only Bangladesh and Pakistan are the most loyal customers of Chinese full spectrum of weapons.
 
Last edited:

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
This is unprecedented.

Serial production of the J-XDS won't begin until the early, if not the mid 2030s, which means CATIC must be projecting a torrent of J-35 export orders given what SAC and other AVIC subsidiaries/affiliates are likely spending in totality on CAPEX to construct this aerospace city, which is by no means a misleading name given the footprint.

AVIC most likely expect the J-35 to become the MiG-21 of its generation in terms of global proliferation, and TBF, it's a reasonable outlook.
China does not have the alliance system necessary to proliferate J-35 like Mig-21.

Soviets did not sell Mig-21 to random unaligned countries, it demanded at least nominal loyalty, just like the US did for F-4s.
 

Hermes

New Member
Registered Member
Mass export of J-35 is a pipe dream. Too much politics involved which will prevent most countries from buying fighter jets from China.

Only Pakistan is guaranteed to buy it. But I doubt anyone else will buy it. Gulf Arabs can't make US angry. China will not sell to Iran. Asean will also not buy to maintain their neutral stance between US and China. Africa too poor. Latin America again will not make US angry.

China needs major revision of its foreign policy and establish its own China camp before countries will buy such advanced weapons from China.

China already had advanced naval ships and advanced missiles, yet not many countries buy those things. The only weapons China sells are mainly land systems to African countries.

Only Bangladesh and Pakistan are the most loyal customers of Chinese full spectrum of weapons.
You’re gonna see huge orders from Arabs very soon. J-35 is the talk of the down in the arab defense communities.
 

zyklon

Junior Member
Registered Member
Too much politics involved which will prevent most countries from buying fighter jets from China.

China is not the sole meaningful competitor against and alternative to the US on the global stage because the Chinese shy away from messy politics.

Gulf Arabs can't make US angry.

Angering the US by purchasing Chinese arms — that alter the regional balance of power — has been a family tradition for the House of Saud since the 1980s, when the father and grandfather of the current Saudi ambassador to Washington arranged for the purchase of 36 Chinese IRBMs while the former occupied the very same position in DC.

From their perspective, provoking Washington by deepening ties with Beijing is akin to manipulating a lover with jealousy. Can't do it too often, but it's a known option of their foreign policy playbook.

Though at this point, the Saudis aren't too far from dumping Uncle Sam for good to be nominally single.

China does not have the alliance system necessary to proliferate J-35 like Mig-21.

Soviets did not sell Mig-21 to random unaligned countries, it demanded at least nominal loyalty, just like the US did for F-4s.

China is not the Soviet Union: the Chinese are not looking to replicate the path or failures of an empire that collapsed onto itself.

TBF, your concern is not unreasonable, but this is a bit of a chicken or egg problem.

China is known to draw in "new friends," or otherwise sow the seeds for geopolitical alignment, by cultivating de facto dependencies without demanding de jure or overt commitments that risk inspiring cold feet.

Once enough dependency on your ecosystem (or supply chains) is established, they'll have to proritize you over the competition whether they want to or not.

If it happens you will see the US make the F-35 available for export to the GCC. They will just nerf it.

It's not going to be "all that easy" for the US to nerf J-35 sales to GCC countries in particular or MENA countries in general.

This isn't exactly a secret, but largely overlooked by most observers: the US has actually been fairly open to selling the F-35 to the KSA in principal.

Problem is the Americans want to sell the Saudis what would effectively be a castrated F-35 (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
), while the Saudis supposedly not only want a level of access and control comparable to what the Israelis got with the F-35I Adir, but a significant degree of localization in line with the stated objectives of their
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
agenda:

Our aim is to localize over 50 percent of military equipment spending by 2030. We have already begun developing less complex industries such as those providing spare parts, armored vehicles and basic ammunition. We will expand this initiative to higher value and more complex equipment such as military aircraft.

Besides the fact that the Israel Lobby, as well as the Qataris, have been tirelessly lobbying Congress against Saudi acquisition of the F-35 for years, Lockheed is understandably reluctant about the Saudis assembling F-35 fighters themselves, and unlike the Italians or Japanese, the Saudis will need Lockheed to "go out of its way" to achieve any reasonable or respectable level of localization.

OTOH, CATIC — which is the AVIC subsidiary principally responsible for exporting Chinese military aircraft — openly markets its
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
exporting assembly lines and manufacturing capacity, with a level of ToT that'd be unimaginable with Lockheed.

If the Saudis are to acquire a 5th gen fighter in meaningful numbers — on their terms or something close to it before 2035 — a Chinese J-35 derivative is realistically speaking the only game in town.
 
Top